I totally agree with Martin_L about Hamish's being a [stunning] worthy winner.
This is what I've just posted up on the main competition page:
While I was delighted to read that I'd won a prize in this comp, and also perplexed to think 'which photo' could that have been.. once I realised which one it was I could hardly believe it.
How could that one, which had been cobbled together, and posted just as 'info', come second to someone like Hamish and his fantastic aerial shot of Stonehenge and the Avenue leading to it?!!
This is a good example of why this form of voting won't work. It was obviously an ongoing item with some other regulars over whether it constituted a worthy shot or not because of the 'join' running up the middle, otherwise I doubt it would have had as many votes.
I've told Andy I'm not happy about it being included, as it gives a false reflection of the quality of our work, and someone more deserving should win second prize. (I've not actually looked at the 3rd,...
Read the rest of this post... |
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Announcing the winners of the Megalithic Portal photo competiton for August 2010 by Andy B on Tuesday, 09 November 2010 (User Info | Send a Message) | Angie, 14 different people voted for it with a score of 9.26 overall, so a lot of 10s in there
The competition says you can score for archaeological interest as well as pure photo quality so it possibly also scored for doing the composition to get so many stones in shot and shown clearly.
Similarly with Martin's, 8 votes, 9.88 overall, so almost all 10s. Very informative photo.
I didn't hype them in there and that's not just us voting.
Andy | [ Reply to This ]
Re: Announcing the winners of the Megalithic Portal photo competiton for August 2010 by AngieLake on Tuesday, 09 November 2010 (User Info | Send a Message) | | Well, Andy, put that way it is very gratifying, but still embarrassing because of the quality. It would be interesting to hear others' *honest* comments on this. The photos after mine were much better in my opinion. | [ Reply to This ]
Re: Announcing the winners of the Megalithic Portal photo competiton for August 2010 by Andy B on Tuesday, 09 November 2010 (User Info | Send a Message) | | Well yes perhaps, but they only got 5,6 and 7 votes. We could use 'judges disgression' to choose from the top 10 photos but we didn't think that would be fair when your photo had more than twice the basic score. Let's see what happens in the next competition. No one in August or September knew they were entering a competition at the time but there were so many photos over the summer that it seemed worth going back and having a look. | [ Reply to This ]
| Re: Announcing the winners of the Megalithic Portal photo competiton for August 2010 by Anonymous on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 | Andy, I love her spliced photo too for the reasons you mention, but as a long time professional photographer I agree she's absolutely right:
When dealing with photographers who stock the site with wonderful photos for free, it would be a sound policy not to highlight images with plain defects without the photographer's permission, as a courtesy to your valued suppliers' reputations, regardless of competition criteria or whether the defected images were fairly elected to some rank. I think you might find that several of your suppliers have good reputations as photographers. If photographers (or any artist) have not entered a contest, one should be truly careful how one proceeds to enter them without their permission if one values their contributions. Certainly the courtesy mentioned above is utterly reasonable and easily implemented. It could never be valid to presume that a photographer would be happy to have defected work pointed out in a worldwide public forum. | [ Reply to This ]
Re: Announcing the winners of the Megalithic Portal photo competiton for August 2010 by Andy B on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 (User Info | Send a Message) | | I see, fair point. In future I will check with the photographers of the top 10 scoring photos first to ask that they are happy to be entered into the competition. I was eager to get on and announce the first results as time was getting on. I'll do that for September. | [ Reply to This ]
|