The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction submitted by h_fenton : News: The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction
Looking towards Stonehenge over the byway that passes to the west of the henge.
Camper vans have been parked up here overnight, I think some of these might be here more than just over a single night, but at least everything is tidy.
Kite Aerial Photograph
29 August 2011
(Vote or comment on this photo)
A public inquiry into the removal of the A344 road and proposed restrictions on the "Boats" (the drove / track) which would have disallowed overnight parking was held in Salisbury earlier this year.
The Stopping Up Orders Inquiry formally closed in June 2011 and the Traffic Regulation Order Inquiry was held in September 2011.
The official web site here which includes the documents submitted to the inquiry to download is here. Look in the 'latest information' section to download the inspector's final report.
Note:Victory for King Arthur and off-road enthusiasts as inspector recommends the drove should remain open to vehicular traffic
Contributor Bio for Andy B: Megalithic Portal Founding Editor.
The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction submitted by JimChampion : By-way west of Stonehenge.
Looking south on the by-way that runs between the A303 and A344 roads, just west of Stonehenge. In the summer there are often camper vans parked on this lane, probably because they don't easily fit into the Stonehenge car park. As the evidence demonstrates, this is a byway open to all traffic
(4 comments - Vote or comment on this photo)
Andy B has found this location on Google Street View:
"The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction" | Login/Create an Account | 26 News and Comments
Go back to top of page Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Inquiry into Stonehenge A344 closure plans by Anonymous on Wednesday, 02 October 2019
And here we are in 2019 and the latest agenda is too build a tunnel now under to stop people seeing it for free ............my god is there no end to these piglet ideas?
Re: Inquiry into Stonehenge A344 closure plans by Anonymous on Friday, 03 January 2014
Another cash cow.
Information says Trust money is used (£10 million).
I have just been to Stonehenge.
It now costs £15 to enter and apparently they get over 1 milion visitors a year.
That's a payback of around 7 months.
Then, money money money.
The UK is milking us all yet again.
Have you tried going anywhere in the UK for less than £15 a head. It costs me £15 just for a travel card for the day on the train.
Wish I was a rich politician/banker/"insert other criminal here".
Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by Andy B on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
The planning inspector has ruled that byways surrounding Stonehenge will remain open to motor vehicles. However the A344 will close as planned. English Heritage intends to return the area to grass as part of plans for a new visitors’ centre at Airman’s Corner.
Regarding the byway known as 'the drove', planning inspector Alan Boyland said: “I accept that Wiltshire has a considerably greater length of byways than any other county. This is not however, in itself, a reason for allowing a further loss for recreational motor vehicle users.
“In this case, the loss of a further 7km, particularly given the strategic importance of those routes, and without similar alternative routes being available, would in my view be significantly detrimental to the current users.”
At the inquiry, Druid leader King Arthur Pendragon said: “It appears that the inspector has erred on the side of common sense and found himself in agreement with the points made.”
Re: Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by Andy B on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
It may be an oversimplification to say a 'victory' to King Arthur. The inspector writes:
"I consider that parking on the BOATs is detrimental to the setting of
Stonehenge and the visual amenity of the WHS. The concerns of groups
such as the Druids and Pagans about what they see as the introduction of
restrictions on parking on the Byways are understandable. However, it
seems that there is no right to do so in any event and hence no such right
would be negated by the TRO."
He suggests "making and enforcing an Order specifically prohibiting parking on the relevant lengths of BOATs, and/or physical measures such as reducing the widths of the BOATs."
The decision to keep them open seems to largely have come down to
"it seems to me that diverting trail riders from BOATs onto roads would be likely to increase the level of risk to their safety, even if the particular roads involved are not in themselves significantly more dangerous than other similar ones."
Re: Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by h_fenton on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
Ok so the A344 is being closed, While I support the Drove remaining open I sort of have slight mixed feelings now whether it is such a good idea - I think that where the drove meets/crosses the A303 will just become an accident blackspot with a greater number of people turning in or emerging from the drove.
Re: Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by AngieLake on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
I think Hamish is right. It's not quite so bad at the A344 junction, but its junction with the A303 is lethal.
In 2010, after walking with a friend from West Amesbury to Stonehenge, via the barrows to the south, we had to cross the A303 to the Drove road from the Normanton side. Finding that gap *really* was scary: there was hardly a break in the traffic hurtling along the A303.
Re: Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by Andy B on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
Mmm, yes. The inspector did recommended a 'no right turn' be put in place at the A303 / Drove junction but didn't consider this safety issue futher (not that I spotted)
Re: Victory for King Arthur as inspector recommends drove should remain open by PastMaster on Sunday, 27 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
I must say I am (selfishly) delighted with the decision, as I always divert along the drove road when I pass Stonehenge, not just because of the excellent view but because the road also passes the Cursus further north. When I attended the original consultation (long ago) no-one seemed to have considered this BOAT at all. Enforcement of no-parking along the drove road seems like a sensible decision though, and the above comments are correct about the very dangerous junction with the A303. I hope the zone won't extend as far as the Cursus, as it's convenient to stop there and explore, and few people actually venture that far.
Finally the Drove Road is the only place you can park for the Winter Solstice morning - will they enforce a no parking rule then, I wonder?
Permission given for section of A344 to be closed by Andy B on Tuesday, 01 November 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
Following the public inquiry, the planning inspector has granted permission for a section of the A344 at Stonehenge to be closed and returned to grass.
English Heritage wants to return the area to grass as part of plans for a new visitors’ centre at Airman’s Corner and an inquiry was held in June.
Inspector Alan Boyland attached two conditions to the permission, to improve Longbarrow Roundabout and for confirmation of details regarding pedestrian and cycle routes along the A344.
Whatever you may think of King Arthur it is rousing stuff, an extract:
We have heard from English Heritage, how they propose to
cater for the Solstices and Equinox, the proposal they put
forward without consultation I might add, with us or any of the
other Pagan or Druid Groups, Is ill-conceived, unrealistic, totally
inadequate and unworkable as they would have realised had
we been consulted, and will in my submission, create far more
problems than it aims to solve.
They would have 'us' turn up punctually on the day and date
given (arbitrarily set in stone) timing our arrival to coincide with
their opening, with no thought to the prevailing traffic conditions
on the various motorway networks and arterial routes
throughout Britain and beyond, that we must use, as our
members and congregation embark upon their pilgrimages from
differing towns, villages, and...
Re: The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction by Andy B on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
SGWI STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE AT TRO PUBLIC INQUIRY
STATEMENT
We are not discussing The Road Less Travelled - these roads are the amongst the most travelled, by all manners of persons and vehicles, freely, for thousands of years and we plead for the right to continue along these byways open to ALL TRAFFIC under our own steam, on foot, by modern car, or otherwise. The BOATs in question have higher rights and are entered on the Definitive Map.
Why don't you want cars parking? Is it because it spoils the view from the visitor centre? That may be so if you are parked on the brow of a byway but hardly to be in sight elsewhere? Because it detracts from someone's amenity, who is to say one amenity is more pertinent to consideration than another?
We are still awaiting the outcome of all the forced amendments to the Visitor Centre [VC] application before it is fully approved. These also contain disabled and parking facilities. Its been requested not to involve the VC in this TRO...
Re: The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction by Anonymous on Tuesday, 18 October 2011
Close the A344 fair enough but Byway 12 should be kept open. It is an ancient right of way and traffic using it is minimal. A few farmers, campers, and photographers. It would also give disabled people of limited means a way to see sunrise at the stones. It doesn't run close to the stones like the A344 and allows viewing from a respectable distance. The only reason English Heritage want to close it, is to give themselves exclusive access to the stones unless you want to walk a few miles. GREED, GREED, GREED.
Re: The Public Inquiry into the closure of the Stonehenge road and Drove restriction by Anonymous on Wednesday, 28 September 2011
Well, I am trying to see both sides here. I can kind of understand people being annoyed by not being able to look through the fence if they don't want to pay to come in--BUT, remember the fence is coming down with the road closure. Obviously there will be security (and probably someone with a ticket machine) to keep people from running into the monument and/or coming in without a ticket beyond a certain distance, but there's nothing to stop you approaching on foot from,say, King Barrow ridge or across from the Cursus just to get a look. So, very likely, within a certain distance, a non-paying visitor will indeed be still able to see the stones!
Of course,parking would be the problem if the green track was closed. (the present carpack is also to be decomissioned as a public carpark)..but hey, a bit of walking won't hurt surely, if you really want to have a look.
I'm afraid the jumble of camper vans on the west track can be pretty lunsightly at times, and certainly some of them...
Draft Inquiry Programme, recommencing 20th September 2011 by Andy B on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
STONEHENGE TRAFFIC REGULATION ORDER INQUIRY
COMMENCING 20 SEPTEMBER 2011
DRAFT INQUIRY PROGRAMME
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PROGRAMME MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF FURTHER CHANGES
The inquiry is scheduled to run for three weeks until the 5th October, with the following being some of the witnesses:
Orcheston PC
English Heritage
LARA
Lois Lloyd
David Bullock
Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger
David Lear
Ms Loraine Knowles
Dr Amanda Chadburn
King Arthur Pendragon
Rollo Maughfling
Vic Price
Andrew Waring
Don Oakley
David Flippance
Re: Stonehenge Stopping Up Orders and Traffic Regulation Order Inquiries by rldixon on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
I have seen The Stones from the side of the road for free and paid both to do the tour and to go among the stones too .....they are just a bunch of greedy Ba*$*$ds who want to make sure no one gets near without having to pay money
I think being able to see the Stones for free from the side of the road is A RIGHT NOT a privilege
Re: Stonehenge Stopping Up Orders and Traffic Regulation Order Inquiries by Blingo_von_Trumpenstein on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
Here here. I consider it my RIGHT aswell. And I will be prepared to fight for it . . watch this space . . .
Stonehenge Stopping Up Orders and Traffic Regulation Order Inquiries by Andy B on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
The Stopping Up Orders Inquiry formally closed on Monday 27 June 2011 and the Traffic Regulation Order Inquiry has been adjourned until Tuesday 20 September 2011.
Re: Stonehenge Stopping Up Orders and Traffic Regulation Order Inquiries by Andy B on Thursday, 30 June 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
celtia on the Stonehenge Peace list has speculated that the adjournement
"may be due to lack of public access to evidence prior to the inquiry, but we are awaiting written clarification. I predicted this would happen as i have been studying how the process is "supposed" to work, and how the processes is being manipulated to disadvantage the objectors. However We the objectors now have another 10 weeks to study e/h's statements of evidence and adjust our evidence accordingly. Some people have not even seen this e/h evidence yet as it was delayed till the very last minute due to "office errors"sic .."
Re: Stonehenge Stopping Up Orders and Traffic Regulation Order Inquiries by Anonymous on Sunday, 03 July 2011
Please study the documents that are available and send your objections
in to the inquiry as it it likely to be completely restarted afresh. Any "public
protest" re the closing of the drove would be pointless until the decision has
ACTUALLY been made, until then the most useful thing for objectors to do is to
object in writing to the inquiry so that you opinions CAN be included in the
decision making. It's NOT a foregone conclusion that EH and Wilts will succeed
in stopping up the drove permanently so please get your opinion down on paper
and send them in. However IF they do succeed in closing the drove's I have no
doubt there will be rather a lot of LARGE ongoing protests in that location.
LARA, PO Box 142, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 5YP http://www.laragb.org
To Helen Wilson
Programme Officer
Stonehenge TRO Inquiry
21 June 2011, by email, 18.25.
Dear Helen,
Further to my letter of yesterday regarding the failure of Wiltshire Council to
issue the statutory notices...
BOAT (Byway open to all traffic) Street View by Andy B on Sunday, 03 July 2011 (User Info | Send a Message)
The BOAT (Byway open to all traffic) that EH and Wiltshire CC are trying to close, along with the A344 is here. As you can see it is possible to park up on it and overnight parking up is tolerated.
We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language. Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen. Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue. Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.