Featured: Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology

Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 595 guests and 2 members online.

Sponsors

Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped

Submitted by coldrum on Tuesday, 18 December 2007  Page Views: 5035

Stonehenge

<< News >>

English Heritage said it is very disappointed plans for a 2.1km bored tunnel taking traffic away from Stonehenge have been shelved.

The announcement, made in a parliamentary statement, concluded the £540m for the proposed tunnel scheme could not be justified.

English Heritage said it was encouraged the setting of the stones and a visitor centre were still a priority.

The cost of the 2.1km-long (1.3 mile) scheme had soared from £223m.

Transport Minister Tom Harris said allocating such sums "cannot be justified and would not represent best use of taxpayers' money".

In a parliamentary written answer, Mr Harris said a review of the Stonehenge improvement plan - which had been the subject of a public inquiry - had identified a shortlist of possible options, including routes to the north and south of Stonehenge.

"After careful consideration, we have now concluded that, due to significant environmental constraints across the whole of the World Heritage Site, there are no acceptable alternatives to the 2.1km bored tunnel scheme.

"The government recognises the importance of the A303 Stonehenge improvement scheme and that the announcement would come as a considerable disappointment for the project's supporters."

He said the Highways Agency would investigate possible small-scale improvements to the A303 as part of its overall stewardship of the route.

The tunnel scheme was deemed the best alternative scheme for an area which suffers major traffic hold-ups.

The decision was welcomed by the Save Stonehenge organisation.

Spokesman Chris Woodford said that only a 1.3-mile section of the proposed 7.7-mile route would have been underground and that the decision "was the only sensible outcome".

"Christmas has come early for Stonehenge. No-one with any sense wanted a tunnel, a flyover, a dual carriageway, and two whacking great interchanges here.

"It's just not acceptable to build 1950s-style motorways in places like this anymore," he said.

Denise Carlo, of the Campaign for Better Transport (formerly Transport 2000), said: "We've been saying for years that the plan to build a tunnel and road through the Stonehenge World Heritage Site would be an environmental and financial disaster."

But shadow transport secretary Theresa Villiers said: "Stonehenge's World Heritage status will be in jeopardy if this problem remains unsolved."

Ms Villiers said the United Nations' cultural arm Unesco had called on the government in July to explain its lack of progress on the scheme, which was announced in 1998.

"Why has this government taken 10 years only to come back to square one? This is one of the most notorious traffic bottlenecks in the country, it impacts on great swathes of the south west who will feel betrayed by this announcement.

"One of our greatest cultural icons has been left in limbo for a decade as a result of this government's total inability to make a decision or deliver on their very clear promises."

bbc.co.uk.

Please add your thoughts on this site

Fairy Paths and Death Roads - Paul Devereux

Fairy Paths and Death Roads - Paul Devereux

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

"Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped" | Login/Create an Account | 10 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by ddavidson on Friday, 01 August 2008
(User Info | Send a Message)


I have just seen the new Stonehenge Management Plan consultation document http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/WHS_Management_Plan_Summary.pdf.

The only thing that really matters is to remove traffic from the area. This will only ever happen in a brutal manner, and would have to be done by closing the A303 at new site entry points at Longbarrow Crossroads and at Amesbury, and the A344 at Airman’s Corner. If we were to imagine that a natural disaster had effected this, minds would be immediately focused on finding alternatives. The most important one would be that traffic would re-adjust itself. Buses could then provide access to the site, and between destinations either side.

I am aware that this is totally simplistic and that there are many practical objections, such as the roads through Larkhill and Salisbury, but none of these should be insoluble on a ‘disaster’ basis. The Visitor Centre should be relocated to one or more of the new site entry points and there be free access on foot to what would become at a stroke a majestic site worthy of its UNESCO designation.

Everything else follows from this, plus a little of the common sense that is all rather ‘dressed up’ in the Plan.

Who is the leader of the campaign?

David Davidson CEng FRAeS
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by Anonymous on Friday, 21 December 2007
In April of 1985 A Texas Tycoon offered to finance a 2.4-mile (4km) long bored tunnel under Stonehenge provided that: (a) UNESCO promptly list the monument as a World Heritage Site by the following year (1986), and that; (b) Her Majesty's Government Highways Agency remove the A344 paved road beside the monument and all of the artefacts beneath the Heelstone. In November of 1986 UNESCO did list Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites, and by 1989 A Texas Tycoon's improvement scheme for the A303 trunk road was put on Her Majesty's Government Roads Programme. Fifty-one (51) possible routes including A Texas Tycoon's 2.4-mile (4km) twin bored tunnel scheme were considered prior to a public consultation. Highways Agency held a Planning Conference in November of 1995 at which time it was recommended that THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE SCHEME to the majority of groups was A Texas Tycoon's April of 1985 plan. In November of 1996 this only acceptable scheme was withdrawn from the Roads Programme because Her Majesty's Government was too embarrassed to accept the financing offered by A Texas Tycoon. My question this fine 2007 Winter Solstice day is: Do you want to construct a 2.4-mile (4km) dual carriageway below Stonehenge or not; because its cost was never an issue.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by mishkin on Friday, 21 December 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
Heritage Action's latest on Achievable Stonehenge;

http://www.heritageaction.org/?page=heritagealerts_stonehenge
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by KiwiJon on Friday, 21 December 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
I'm not sure that using buses is the way forward for Stonehenge. The only megalithic site I know that uses this system is Bru -na- Boyne where long delays are inevitable and guided tours are compulsory.
Now, I like guided tours in some places but I also like to spend time wandering on my own, in my own time. I missed that at Newgrange because the bus was waiting. I can see the same thing happening at Stonehenge as they will be compelled to make the site economically viable through a certain number of bus visits per hour.
So here's a compromise. For part of the time open the site to bused in tour parties. For the rest of the time make it access by foot only. This could happen during summer evenings and during winter periods when tour bus demand is lower.
Those who want to expericence the site away from the crowds will be prepared to make the journey on foot. Plenty of people in the past did.
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by Chyknel2 on Saturday, 22 December 2007
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    "So here's a compromise. For part of the time open the site to bused in tour parties. For the rest of the time make it access by foot only."

    That makes sense. Although how many buses and when could be worked out in the light of experience I suppose.

    I would hope there would be absolutely no need for queus for buses though since if the bus fare was part of the entry fee - and a fiver would seem reasonable - even English Heritage would find it hard not to see investing in sufficient buses would make them money!
    [ Reply to This ]
    Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by MikeGreen on Wednesday, 25 June 2008
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Yeah! I'd go along with something like that
    [ Reply to This ]
    Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by MikeGreen on Friday, 20 November 2009
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Yep I like the idea, quite prepared to accept that
    [ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by Anonymous on Thursday, 20 December 2007
Is there a Roman road under the A344?
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by MikeGreen on Thursday, 20 December 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
Just as we all predicted - Next step

1) Immediately close road that runs past the henge
2) Build a learning centre at the roundabout
3) Bus people from the centre - no parking at Stonehenge itself
4) Remove portakabins
5) Move fence
6) Dig up road near Hele Stone
7) Stonehenge is a national disgrace - Cor! if this were France

Mike
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Stonehenge tunnel plans scrapped by coldrum on Tuesday, 18 December 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
Stonehenge: so what now?

AS plans for the Stonehenge tunnel scheme lay in tatters this week, Salisbury MP Robert Key called on government ministers to set up a Stakeholder Task Force to piece together new solutions to the problems of the World Heritage site and the area's traffic nightmare.

For more than 20 years, both Labour and Tory governments have struggled to find an acceptable scheme for restoring the ancient stones to their original setting and easing traffic congestion on the A303 West Country holiday route that runs past the monument.

And the latest project bit the dust last Thursday when Transport Minister Tom Harris scrapped the controversial proposal to bury the A303 in a 2.1km tunnel.

The scheme had been eight years on the planning boards, during which time the cost of the venture spiralled from £193m to £540m at today's prices.

Its cancellation has now effectively killed off English Heritage's plans to build a £70m Stonehenge visitors' centre east of...

Read the rest of this post...
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.