Featured: Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

The Henge Monuments of the British Isles: Myth and Archaeology

The Henge Monuments of the British Isles: Myth and Archaeology

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 722 guests and 1 members online.

Sponsors

Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners

Submitted by vicky on Tuesday, 30 December 2003  Page Views: 3006

Stonehenge

<< News >>

submitted by : (Vote or comment on this photo)
Residents living on the edge of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site have accused heritage bosses of placing more importance on life 4,000 years ago than the quality of life of today's inhabitants who live close to the ancient stones.

People living in Fargo Road and Strangways, near Larkhill, say English Heritage and the National Trust plan to remove "20th century clutter" from the site but will be replacing them with "21st century clutter".

The accusations were made at a public meeting in Figheldean last week, when English Heritage and the National Trust revealed their plans for the multi-million-pound Stonehenge visitor centre and the revolutionary land trains that will ferry tourists to and from the stones.

Within the next week or so, a planning application will be submitted to Salisbury district council for the new centre and for the route the land trains will use - even though the ministry of defence has not yet agreed to part with land needed from them for the route.

Residents living in Fargo Road and Strangways were notified just before Christmas that English Heritage and the National Trust had chosen their preferred route.

The meeting was held to give residents an opportunity to have their say and raise issues that English Heritage and the National Trust can consider before submitting their planning application.

John Maloney, assistant project director for English Heritage, told the meeting the route chosen for the land trains would be a northern one, starting at the visitor centre and running along the back of houses in Fargo Road and Strangways and into a terminus at Durrington Farm.

Drop-off points containing just a shelter will be at strategic points along the route and, once at the terminal, visitors will have a ten-minute walk along a bridleway to the stones.

The bridleway will be upgraded, so that it can be used by disabled visitors and people in wheelchairs.

The route the land trains will travel goes within 50m of the backs of houses in Fargo Road and Strangways but tree-screening and fencing will help obscure the trains from the houses, said Mr Maloney.

Keith Rowe, assistant project director for the National Trust, said that, of the six possible routes, the northern one was the only option and he said resident's concerns would be taken into consideration.

Jane Danser, of English Heritage who is based in Salisbury, assured those present they would meet residents in the New Year individually or as a group, to talk over concerns.

Penny Worboys, who lives in Fargo Road, said the plans for Stonehenge only replaced 20th century clutter with 21st century clutter.

She said: "There are no land trains or tracks there now, no visitor centre.

"They are being introduced.

"You are putting something at the back of our houses that is not there now."

Residents were told that, on peak days, up to six land trains an hour would operate.

On other days, there were likely to be between two or three an hour but during the winter months perhaps only one an hour.

Pete Robinson told the meeting: "The quality of life of today's residents seems to be less important than those of 4,000 years ago."

Harvey Clarke asked if English Heritage had considered the effect on the valuation of homes in Fargo Road and Strangways and whether compensation would be paid.

Another questioned the tree-screening, which could cast shadows over their gardens.

Residents suggested that the land train route be sunk into the ground slightly, to reduce the impact, and they asked that any screening be as close to the route as possible, to maximise its effect.

Mr Maloney promised that all suggestions made at the meeting would be looked at and discussed further with local people in the new year, prior to the planning application.

One problem still facing English Heritage and one that could jeopardise the land train project is the ministry of defence's reaction.

The ministry has not yet agreed to sell land it owns near Larkhill and which is needed for the land train route.

Without that permission, the scheme is a `no go'.

Source: Salisbury Journal 30/12/2003

Please add your thoughts on this site

Before the Pyramids, Cracking Archaeology's Greatest Mystery by Knight & Butler

Before the Pyramids, Cracking Archaeology's Greatest Mystery by Knight &  Butler

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

"Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners" | Login/Create an Account | 8 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by Anonymous on Sunday, 04 January 2004
Hello, As I read this far away in USA, but am English I seem to recal soooooo much countryside surrounding Stone Henge! How come they gotta put railway tracks so close to people's homes when there must be wide open spaces left still to this day, where there are no dwellings, and thus it would not be a problem to place trains there? Of course the answer is simple......a straight road, the clostest route, is the cheapest one, but devalues the integrity of the National Trust etc and what it stands for in my opnion.
Blessings and Fresh Air and No Noise and Clutter from Wendy in New Jersey
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by baz on Sunday, 04 January 2004
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Stonehenge still stands within its rural setting; there are no homes near to Stonehenge. However, Stonehenge does presently lie between two main roads with a dangerous junction and has an ugly visitor centre with its car park.
    If all goes to plan, then the visitor centre and car park will be moved some miles away; one road will be closed and the other placed within a tunnel. The ancient landscape around Stonehenge will be restored and you'll have to walk there, either across the landscape or from one of a few land train dropping-off points from the new visitor centre. The "land train" will have pneumatic tyres and not run on rails. It will not go straight to Stonehenge but take a circular route around the whole World Heritage Site, dropping you off at you're preferred place of alightment for your walk to the stones. For those who come to Stonehenge as the culmination of a journey, then the experience should be greatly enhanced. For those who want to "do" Stonehenge in half an hour on their to somewhere-else, then its bad news.
    [ Reply to This ]

Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by Anonymous on Friday, 02 January 2004
I would love to visit one day, but if the proposed is implemented I would boycott this site because of the negative impact the "improvements" will have made on the surrounding environment and residents. To some of us it is a revered place, to be viewed with awe and a serene countenance. The journey itself is part of the experience. To know I had been a party to an unwanted influx of additional noise and disruption would negate the sole purpose of trip. Karen Kliemann, Seattle Washington (a city with its own negative tourist issues to deal with)
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by baz on Sunday, 04 January 2004
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Your journey to Stonehenge will be greatly enhanced by the improvements which are being proposed. The present car park and visitor centre, right next to Stonehenge, will be removed and you will have to walk for the last ten minutes of your journey to the site, across a landscape which has been cleared of modern clutter.
    The residents who are complaining in the above article live two miles from Stonehenge, near to Woodhenge, Durrington Walls and the Cuckoo Stone. It is hoped that visitors will alight from the land trains on the way to or from Stonehenge and visit these sites too.
    [ Reply to This ]
      Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by itsme on Monday, 05 January 2004
      (User Info | Send a Message)
      The only down side to visiting Stonehenge at all is all the other "tourists" - they're the ones on a timescale who rush around and don't get to appreciate the quite and aura of this place. I find it best visited in the winter - no so many foreigners (I am a local and would not want to spoil the area for anything in the world) It might be a good thing to put people off if they knew they had to walk any distance to get to the circle. How many miles did our ancestors have to walk to visit this special place, rather than be dumped by the coachload right on the doorstep.
      [ Reply to This ]

Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by arthur on Wednesday, 31 December 2003
(User Info | Send a Message)
Ironic, I live in an area covered in pre-history neolithic and bronze age sites and no one seems interested, Arthur, Burbage, Leicestershire.
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by Andy B on Wednesday, 31 December 2003
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Arthur,
    Write us an article about it. I got your booklet, can you remind me of your e-mail address.
    Cheers,
    Andy
    [ Reply to This ]
      Re: Residents near Stonehenge accuse `clutter' planners by arthur on Thursday, 01 January 2004
      (User Info | Send a Message)
      dear andy, my email address I prefer is [email protected] or [email protected] but the latter is i nfested with spam.I am not an expert on the c/p. This is a large remote area between leicester coventry and warwick,the domain of the amateur, I and others have unearthed palaeolithic artefacts (private collections) from the banks of the "Bytham" britains oldest river that shows early hominids came by river to escape lions etc and scavenge off large herbivors that roamed the banks.I am trying to obtain a more complete picture of what went on 500,000 years ago with the help of experts in Warwickshire. The interesting astronomy flint artefacts (mesolithic) show that time measuring was taking place before the neolithic. arthur
      [ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.