Featured: Explore Scotland (and everywhere else) with our Megalithic Portal iPhone app

Explore Scotland (and everywhere else) with our Megalithic Portal iPhone app

Prehistoric Cumbria

Prehistoric Cumbria

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 523 guests and 7 members online.

Sponsors

Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep England

Submitted by Andy B on Wednesday, 23 March 2005  Page Views: 5877

Discoveries

<< News >>

Country: England Here's a nice happy story from Wiltshire that exposes the sad truth about the English National Curriculum. Prehistory is not taught in English Primary schools (Key Stage 2, age 7-11) unless you have some prehistory locally that you can hang it on, as in the story below from Wiltshire. In this case it's 'Local Studies'. Learning about the wider picture, or anywhere else in the country - forget it. More children in the USA seem to learn about Stonehenge at school than in England, judging by the questions in our e-mailbag.

Teaching British children archaeology

A Decade ago they would not have known what the word meant, but programmes such as Time Team have filled today's youngsters with enthusiasm. Wiltshire (England) children as young as five will soon be studying archaeology as part of their school curriculum - and the county's world-famous landmark, Stonehenge, will help them.

The Government says Key Stage 2 pupils can go back as far as the Egyptians to learn about history, and in Wiltshire many schools have decided to make use of the ancient treasures on their own doorstep. 22 teachers from around the county took part in a day-long session at Salisbury Museum and were given ideas on how to teach the wonders and mysteries of Stonehenge and archaeology in general.

Children will also learn about the King and Prince of Stonehenge, who were laid to rest with their possessions, including fabulous gold earrings or hair clasps, 4,300 years ago. Their discovery near the stone circle at Boscombe Down three years ago was hailed as one of the most important finds of recent decades. Field trips to Salisbury and other Wiltshire museums are also likely, and children in other parts of the county may focus on sites nearer their schools, such as the Avebury circle.

Amanda Feather, Stonehenge World Heritage Site educational co-ordinator, said: "Children these days are knowledgeable about techniques they have seen on TV and very interested in the whole concept of uncovering the past. They like the idea of becoming detectives and trying to solve the mysteries of the past. Many of them want to be archaeologists." Last year a Stonehenge Scheme of Work was trialed at Amesbury primary school to support the teachers' use of Stonehenge in their lessons. Ms Feather said: "This year we are launching the initiative to support all schools in Wiltshire."

Source: Wester Daily Press (18 March 2005) with thanks to Stone Pages News

Please add your thoughts on this site

Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend

Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

"Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep" | Login/Create an Account | 7 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by Thorgrim on Thursday, 24 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
History is not about what happened and neither is pre-history. History is about the interpretation of selective events as recorded by contemporary chroniclers. Pre-history is more honest in that it admits to interpretation of that which is excavated - It sometimes builds too much upon finds and ignores what has perished.

History in schools is now politically correct dynamite! Look at how the history of World war II is taught in schools in Britain, USA , France, Germany and Russia. None will be objective and all will give a spin to maximise national glory and minimise national shame - whole episodes will be ignored, others will be distorted. As I say - it is not about what really happened.

Prehistory in primary schools? With so many primary school children now being from ethnic communities originating elsewhere - should pre-history be about long barrows in Britain or the cities of Sumer and Mohenjo-Daro?
Teach a common pre-historic culture or make a comparitive study? - for primary school children????

Primary school for me was great - it taught me to read and write and do simple arithmetic - no history or geography at all! Secondary school was a complete waste of time and I remember nothing of history, geography, physics, chemistry, maths. I left as soon as I could and the public library became my university - today it would be the internet. What little I know of pre-history is self taught and gleaned from the excellent Megalithic Portal. Children will find their own way without bureaucratic bungling from educationalists who are constantly re-vamping the educational system and constantly getting it wrong. Look at a children's quiz show on television - they know nothing - nothing at all! Q. Who was Churchill? A. Insurance salesman
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by creators on Thursday, 24 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
Looking at this subject exposes us to the very real recent, and not so recent, bloody histories of England and the USA, and the world. Horrific stuff! How dare we, the inheritors of the past, bare our heads, look at history, accept all that is in our history, without shame? Well, we just should look.

It matters not one jot to those past, but it matters a great deal to us now. And it matters a great deal more if we do not. It may be that the stones that we/I so reverence on this site were sites of blood offerings, it may be that they were sites of despicable horror. So? We cannot change the past, but what is available to us all is the future, if we reverence these stones, if we take them to our hearts, even with and in the blood of the past, are we not part of a living history that can work these things out?

Being informed by the past, even speculation of an uninformed or unwritten past, is not the same as anything we might achieve, be, or desire to be.

Someone light a candle, because I don't do night lights.

It is worth remembering that history in schools is written by those who want to MAKE history, and not by those whose choose to study it and know it, or even bear with it and bear it.

Are our children informed? I abhor the invasion of Iraq. It eats at me that we have done this. But what will history report, what will history make of my country invading a nation that made no aggressive move on another nation, and how will I vote in the forth coming election in MY country?

History is littered with rotten stuff, ugly stuff, and is rewritten poorly and just as rottenly.

No one will ever know why megaliths were built. Why Avebury (my personal fascination) why Stonehenge, why any megaliths?

Perhaps an honest history will talk of genocide, and perhaps the very stones that we visit could tell us something about genocide. Or something else. I think it is about something else that remains their attraction, but we don't know. Eh?
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by Anonymous on Thursday, 24 March 2005
I agree with Partlow and the other comments on this subject. When i went to the local high school to see if they would be interested in local archaeology, I was informed that history for them starts from the Anglo-Saxons and they could not alter the system to include anything else. Arthur, Burbage,Leicestershire.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by creators on Wednesday, 23 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
Oddly enough, I spent most of my working life as a community and youth worker and the single, biggest problem, I felt that young people were displaying, in an unarticulated and destructive way, was their complete lack of sense of being located in history. To be part of any community, to have 'roots', surely involves a sense of place, a sense of being a part of something older and still ongoing?

I bothers me that in our post industrial world, where education is for work and not life, we are losing what the great Woody Guthrie wrote, 'This land is your land, this land is my land, this land was made for you and me'.

Archaeology can be so real and so alive, it can inspire a wonderful sense of life, of time stream, and belonging in the great history of the world. It is a tragedy that our children are not getting that kind of education.

I agree that there is hope, people are not as dumb as modern politics would have us be. As long as we still have brains, not linked to global-corp, in some Orwellian nightmare, the persuit and habit of enquiry will live on.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by Partlow on Wednesday, 23 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
There is a problem in the 'States' concerning education in history. Those of us who were interested in the subject had to study on their own and that was when education in the subject was much better. We, who studied archaeology and ancient societies during early childhood are, I'm afraid, in the minority of even those who are interested in more recent eras, i.e., within the past thousand years. This is, of course a view point from dealing with American society. People want easy cut-&-dried answers when reflection is more important. There is always hope though.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by TimPrevett on Wednesday, 23 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
A lot of children *do* get some prehistory at school - but only as a necessary precursor to the Romans. English curriculums tend to look at Boudica, while the Welsh often study Caractacus.

As someone in both Roman and Prehistoric camps, I agree that prehistory should be studied more in its own right. The Romans indeed brought new technology and ways with them, but the technology and ways of life pre-Roman stand up in their own right. Though I am sure I preach to the converted!

Cheers

Tim
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Kids - no prehistory at school unless you're lucky to have some on your doorstep by Andy B on Wednesday, 23 March 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
I remember studying Neolithic and Bronze age times quite extensively at age 10 in the late 1970s. I was fascinated and I think it's fair to say this played a part in getting me hooked.

I'd love to be proved wrong about the Primary Curriculum - let me know.
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.