Featured: New Book: Astrometrology: The Science of Ancient Metrology by Christopher Willett

New Book: Astrometrology: The Science of Ancient Metrology by Christopher Willett

Random Image

The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Native American Indian Mounds

The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Native American Indian Mounds

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 675 guests and 1 members online.

Sponsors

<< News >> Heritage Bodies Sponser Study Into Illegal Removal Of Archaeology

Submitted by coldrum on Thursday, 22 March 2007  Page Views: 2350

Site WatchCountry: England Oxford Archaeology is to undertake a new project to collate intelligence and monitor activity around the illegal removal of antiquities, otherwise known as nighthawking, from archaeological sites.

The Nighthawks Study will collect data on the extent of damage to our archaeological heritage caused by nighthawking, and a web portal allowing people to fill in an online questionnaire will be launched in April/May 2007.

Backed by English Heritage, Cadw, Historic Scotland, National Museums of Wales and the Portable Antiquities Scheme, the project will cover the whole of the UK and the Crown dependencies of the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.

It will also seek to foster a climate of opinion within all partners in the heritage sector and the government that the illegal search, removal and sale of antiquities is unacceptable.

Damage to archaeological sites caused by illegal searching and excavating and the sale of archaeological items on internet auction sites is still causing concern amongst heritage bodies, but there is a lack of robust data that details and quantifies the extent of the damage. Convictions are also rare.

“What we are going to do is try to get some reasonably reliable data about the scale of the problem and raise the profile of it with the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service, so that when potential prosecutions present themselves they are pursued,” explained Pete Wilson, English Heritage’s Head of Research Policy (Roman Archaeology) and a leading figure in the subject area of portable antiquities.

Dr Wilson points to a recent case in Kent that saw a metal detectorist’s house raided and several items found with mud still on them. The detectorist even had the find locations of the pieces logged on his computer, but the case never made it to prosecution.

There have even been reports of a team in a white van armed with equipment that would rival English Heritage’s own geophysical teams, whilst at Warborough Roman site in Surrey a team of nighthawkers turned up with a lorry and a mechanical digger and started taking up great parts of the earth for sifting and sorting at another location.

“There is a feeling that the level of organisation is such that there is an element who are, as much as you can do with these type of antiquities, finding things to order,” said Dr Wilson.

Most metal detectorists belong to bona fide clubs that responsibly log their finds and work closely with the Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs) of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS), which helps finders log their finds and map locations.

Every year thousands of objects are discovered in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - mostly by metal detector users. PAS, which is managed by the British Museum on behalf of the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, offers the only proactive method for systematically logging and recording them for the public benefit.

The Finds Liaison Officers work with local organisations and museums to help members of the public to record their archaeological finds and navigate their way through the Treasure Act. The data is then made available through the scheme’s website at finds.org.

By law, certain objects, such as old gold and silver coins, can only be sold if they are reported under the 1996 Treasure Act.

Metal detecting clubs, key archaeological organisations, and landowners’ organisations came together on May 2 2006 to launch a Code of Practice on Responsible Metal Detecting in England and Wales. The code built on earlier efforts to provide guidance for all users of metal detectors.

But despite the good work of the PAS and Metal Detector Clubs there are still a minority of irresponsible individuals who use their hobby illicitly for personal gain.

“Metal Detecting, if done properly and responsibly, has an important part to play in understanding our past, however - there is still a minority of metal detectorists who do so outside of the law,” said Michael Lewis, Deputy Director of the PAS.

“What we hope the nighthawking project does is raise the issue onto the political agenda. The basis of the problem is that it is so difficult to quantify this activity, which is the whole point of the study.”

Data on nighthawking activities will be collected through a questionnaire filled out online or on paper. Key organisations will be asked to contribute information to the project and interviews will be conducted. The project will also collect data on the illicit sale of goods of archaeological material online and elsewhere.

For their part, the popular online auction site eBay.co.uk launched an online guide in October 2006, created with the assistance of the British Museum and PAS, to buying and selling antiquities safely on the auction with advice about reporting obligations.

PAS say they have noticed a marked decline in the amount of archaeological antiquities on the site and sellers of such items have also begun noting when something has been logged by a Finds Liaison Officer or been through the Treasure process. But the perception persists amongst heritage bodies that illicit sales continue; and the monitoring of the illicit sale of antiquities being traded on eBay and elsewhere is still relatively piecemeal and under-resourced.

“We’re in the very early stages of this,” added Dr Wilson. “Oxford Archaeology are leading the research and will be talking to archaeologists, FLOs and metal detectorists but we don’t know at this stage how the project is going to look at the problem of data validation. There are obvious sensitivities when compiling data on what is essentially criminal activity.”

24hourmuseum.

Note: See comments on changes to the Treasure act and Heritage farming.

<< New tests add years to story of skull find

South Korea to correct misinformation regarding prehistoric age in textbooks >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe, Bradley

Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe, Bradley

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

Latest Visit Logs

  • Alignement de Leintant
    “With better info than in 2005, I managed to find this in June 2016, not far off the lane and at the …”
    by TheCaptain · 24 Aug 2026
  • Leintant menhir
    “With better info than in 2005, I managed to find this menhir this time, not far off the lane and at …”
    by TheCaptain · 24 Aug 2026
  • Pierre Tourneresse, Cairon
    “This site seems well cared for and the paths have been kept clear for walking. The trees around the …”
    by brianlavelle · 24 Aug 2026
  • Newton Kyme Henge
    “On private land and crops in field at time of visit so unable to ascertain condition except outer ba…”
    by Chappers60 · 24 Aug 2026
  • Ferrybridge Henge
    “Interestingly, an overgrown path, known as 'New' road that follows field boundaries on either side s…”
    by Chappers60 · 24 Aug 2026

"Heritage Bodies Sponser Study Into Illegal Removal Of Archaeology" | Login/Create an Account | 3 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Heritage farming by coldrum on Thursday, 22 March 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
The Government this week put forward new plans for the protection of archaeological sites on agricultural lands.

The heritage white paper suggests existing consents which allow sites to be cultivated could be withdrawn in favour of individual management agreements.

But agricultural agencies are concerned the scheme will not be properly funded and many farmers are worried they will be left out of pocket

The South West is rich in archaeological sites and Bodmin Moor has more than its fair share.

Most are open to public access, but this is also working agricultural land.

Steve Nankivell's family have been farming on the 2300-acre Hamatethy Common for four generations... and it is a delicate balance.

Stewardship scheme

Many farmers are paid to look after the land rather than to work it.

Steve is one of 35 commoners here signed up to the Countryside Stewardship Scheme to preserve the natural habitat and prevent overgrazing.

Effectively they are compensated by DEFRA for restrictions imposed on how many animals they can graze on the moor and when - but that can lead to problems when it comes to protecting the many ancient sites.

"There's an ancient field system on the side of Roughtor. DEFRA wanted us to spray a 2ha area to keep down the growth.

It cost us £900 to do it and we got back £300 in grants. That put us £600 in costs - costs we can't bear" said Steve.

Ancient fort

Clarence Paull has an ancient fort on his farm near Fowey. Castle Dore is thought to date back to 300BC and was an important site in the Civil War.

It was overgrown with brambles when he took on the farm in 1957 and clearing it has been a huge job.

At one time Clarence used to cultivate the land in and around the fort to grow cauliflower... but it has been set aside for some years and he now qualifies for grant aid to help maintain the site.

"I think minimum wage is somewhere around £2.50 an hour, I probably receive closer to 25 pence an hour" he said.

"But that's not to say I don't appreciate it. It does help and I love to see the site a bit more cared for."

Class consents

Some farmers have been allowed to continue cultivating heritage sites under voluntary agreements known as class consents.

The consents were based on research which suggested ploughing at the same depth did not damage the archaeology beneath.

But in its Heritage White Paper published this week the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, says that has changed:

"Research by DEFRA and English Heritage has shown... that such cultivation causes damage to a significant number of scheduled ancient monuments...

"We will reform the current system based on a management agreement approach."

Scheme under funded?

The National Farmers Union says the last thing farmers want to do is to damage ancient monuments.

It is concerned English Heritage will not receive sufficient funding to support the scheme. And it is not alone.

"We want to examine this White Paper," said Shadow Culture Media and Sport Secretary Hugo Swire MP.

"We want to make sure that funding is there otherwise its empty rhetoric and there is nothing worse than asking farmers to comply with something which isn't properly enforced and funded - that would be a waste of everyone's time!"

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is inviting consultations on the contents of the White Paper by the 01 June 2007.

It says class consents will only be withdrawn on individual sites if a management agreement is first offered and it says agreements will make use of existing schemes wherever possible.

It also says the agreements will be designed to last for 10 years - ensuring our heritage is preserved way beyond the foreseeable future.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/politics_show/6446513.stm
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Changes to the Treasure Act by coldrum on Thursday, 22 March 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
The way the Treasure Act 1996 is administered is changing

From today the British Museum will provide certain services to the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport in relation to the performance of her functions under the Treasure Act. These services will include the valuation of treasure finds, the invoicing of museums, the payment of rewards and supporting the Treasure Valuation Committee.

Locating the performance of these functions within one body will improve the service offered to finders of Treasure, landowners, occupiers and acquiring museums. Those involved will only have to deal with a single set of staff who will be better placed to ensure the smooth progress of any Treasure find through the system.

However, steps have been taken to ensure that any potential conflicts of interest are avoided. Therefore, for those finds that the British Museum has shown an interest in acquiring, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport will continue to undertake valuation, invoicing and payment of rewards.

http://www.gnn.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=272343&NewsAreaID=2
[ Reply to This ]

Changes to the Treasure Act by coldrum on Thursday, 22 March 2007
(User Info | Send a Message)
Changes to the way treasure finds are dealt with have been made, which will help museums acquire rare finds more easily.

The British Museum took on administrative responsibilities for the Treasure Act from the Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) on Monday March 19 2007.

These service include the valuation of treasure finds, the invoicing of museums who wish to buy treasure, the payment of awards to treasure finders and supporting the Treasure Valuation Committee.

The changes mean that the treasure process should be more efficient and that finders of treasure, landowners and acquiring museums will only have to deal with a single set of administrative staff.

Roger Bland, Head of the museum’s Department of Portable Antiquities and Treasure, which is taking on the new responsibilities, explained:

“It is something we have been talking about since July 2005. There had to be an amendment to the Treasure Act Code of Practice, which was a Parliamentary process.”

“It is about how we work in this department and within the DCMS. Finders and museums should see the benefit, however. We have hitherto dealt with the first part of the process then handed over to the DCMS, so now it has got to be easier for the interested parties,” he said. “There will be definite benefits to having it all in one place.”

Treasure finders will still report their finds in the same way, through local Finds Liaisons Officers working for the British Museum’s Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS).

Under the 1996 Treasure Act anyone who finds potential treasure – archaeological artefacts like Roman coins or other important artefacts – must report it. If the find is declared treasure then it is made Crown property and is available for museums to acquire, although the finder or landowner can receive payment for it.

Most treasure is defined as objects containing at least 10% precious metal that is at least 300 years old when found.

To prevent a conflict of interests, treasure finds that the British Museum expresses an interest in acquiring will still be dealt with by the DCMS.

Since the PAS was launched reported treasure finds has risen each year. In 2004 there were 509 cases of treasure and in 2005 this figure rose to 597 cases. This rose further in 2006 to 673 reported finds.

http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/nwh_gfx_en/ART45309.html
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.