Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Random Image

The Significance of Monuments

The Significance of Monuments

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 492 guests and 0 members online.

Sponsors

Executive accused of "betraying Scotland's heritage"

Submitted by PaulM on Monday, 12 April 2004  Page Views: 1632

Site Watch

<< News >>

Hundreds of Scotland’s ancient monuments are to be stripped of their protected status in a controversial move by the Executive. Almost 800 archaeological sites considered until now to be of national importance will be dropped from Historic Scotland’s official schedule.

The change follows a decision by the Executive to restrict protection to monuments which meet new criteria of "cultural significance" and "spiritual value".

Critics have attacked the move, accusing the Executive of "betraying Scotland’s heritage" and clearing the way for developers to build on protected sites.

Scotland has a host of significant archaeological treasures, including locations dating from prehistoric times.

The change of classification will put the future of many of Scotland’s 7,700 ancient forts, carved crosses, standing stones, cairns, war memorials and prehistoric settlements under threat.

Jamie McGrigor MSP, the Conservative culture spokesman said: "These reminders of Scotland’s past are vital for our tourism industry and it’s very important that they are preserved for future generations. We have an extraordinary heritage which is a treasure trove we ignore at our peril."

Roseanna Cunningham MSP, the SNP culture spokeswoman, said: "I find it hard to believe that something considered 20 years ago to be a historic monument of national importance should no longer be considered worthy of protection."

Robin Harper, the leader of the Scottish Green Party said: "This is an appalling betrayal of a significant proportion of Scotland’s heritage. It’s a gift to the developers who want to build on sites which, on reflection, would be better saved for the nation.

"Scheduling is a vital tool to protect lesser-known archaeological sites, some of which might be a few stones sticking out of the ground, but all of which are of national importance."

Officials at Historic Scotland were unable to say which monuments and archaeological sites would be affected by the changes, claiming decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis.

An Executive consultation report revealed that the revised criteria would be applied to every monument currently scheduled, as well as all new finds.

It said: "Over time this will sift out monuments that can no longer be justified as being of national importance.

"It could be argued that some monuments at present on the schedule are not of sufficient importance to merit the very strong presumption against development that scheduled status now provides."

Future preservation of the de-scheduled monuments will be left to council planning departments and landowners will have to depend on agriculture and forestry grant schemes for any preservation work. Source: The Scotsman.com

Please add your thoughts on this site

Build your own Stonehenge! (Model)

Build your own Stonehenge! (Model)

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

"Executive accused of "betraying Scotland's heritage"" | Login/Create an Account | 6 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Executive accused of by kooljeff on Wednesday, 05 May 2004
(User Info | Send a Message)
So Labour's hatred of our built and historic environment comes to the fore accompanied by their love affair with big business. It is not "Cool Britannia". This cynical exercise is nothing more than a capitulation to developers. There are plenty of examples of the Labour Government's desecration of our heriage, this is just the next step. Beware the rest of Britain. Remember Labour is run by a Scottish internal mafia, what happens in Scotland could happen in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Remember,, if you are Scottish, you have a chance to do something about it in the forthcoming elections. The only wasted vote is one NOT used.
[ Reply to This ]

Re-post from Britarch by Andy B on Wednesday, 14 April 2004
(User Info | Send a Message)
Fellow list members may be interested to see the actual case for adopting
new national importance criteria in Scotland at

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/culture/natimport.pdf

rather than the '10% of monuments will be descheduled' stuff in The
Scotsman. I cannot imagine a list of scheduled monuments that did not have
the East Linton cursus monument on it....every generation has decided what
is and what isn't important enough to preserve. The argument is made in the
consultation paper.

I would be happy to answer any queries at gordon.barclay -at- scotland.gsi.gov.uk

Gordon Barclay
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Re-post from Britarch by Anonymous on Friday, 07 May 2004
    I have to confess that Gordon BArclays response was to my original emailo highlighting just what is being said here. I have since talked to him on the telephone and have agreed to complete a Formal Response Form (see link) I am slightly less worried than before, but in my full written response I do point out the difference between the statutory powers available to protect a SAM site and the lack of such powers to protect sites of material consideration that they would become. If this all sounds like gobbldygook... fear not... basicaly the sites that are descheduled will not be open to immediate destruction.. however they will be under the protection of the v. overstretched councli planning archaeologist... I know... I am one! However it is not all bad... as many sites are really not of massive importance (and thats even locally!!) and the report is not suggesting that standing stones are ripped down, or Edinburgh Castle is turned into a new Housing Scheme. I do agree with a reclassification as we now no olonger look at Scotland with Nationalist Eyes, but rather as a place which was fluid and changing, and the new designations will reflect the regional/cultural importance much more than the outmoded national importnace.... I could go on... but i suggest you read the This is a link


  • [ Reply to This ]

Re: Executive accused of by Anonymous on Tuesday, 13 April 2004
Some greedy officials must have received a "Pay-Off"- to proceed with such incredibly stupid actions- It would seem that Scotlands Heritage is "Up For Sale" to the highest bidder, and everyone involved with this decision should receive tons of fertiliser in front of their respective dwellings.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Action Required! by skitt on Tuesday, 13 April 2004
(User Info | Send a Message)
I agree with Andy B in that some serious action is needed to counter this outrageous policy decision - I've already written to my MSP [Roseanna Cunningham - Perth] to voice my outrage.
I'll support any local [Perthshire] action to fight this and know others here and elsewhere who are also willing to campaign!
- skitt
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scotlandssacredsites/
[ Reply to This ]

Action Required! by Andy B on Monday, 12 April 2004
(User Info | Send a Message)
There's some serious action required here. I can see sites being quietly dropped from the list with no visibility of what's going on. Then it will be a huge task to argue the case for each de-listed site in turn. Those with an MSP must start lobbying for a reversal of this policy.
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.