Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Inscribed Across the Landscape: The Cursus Monuments of Great Britain

Inscribed Across the Landscape: The Cursus Monuments of Great Britain

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 611 guests and 0 members online.

Sponsors

<< News >> US museums and universities face questions about requests for return of remains

Submitted by coldrum on Wednesday, 23 April 2008  Page Views: 1979

Pre-ContactAt the same time that Ohio State University is preparing to send the remains of American Indians back to West Virginia, the school is returning tissue and blood samples from Yanomamo tribes, at the request of the Brazilian government. In northeastern Ohio, the Cleveland Museum of Natural History has received a letter from Odawa Indians requesting the return of two wooden ceremonial bowls.

The Cleveland Museum of Art is talking with Italian authorities who want several antiquities returned.

Similar requests for human remains, artifacts and art are on the rise nationwide, museum officials say.

"I think there will be an increase in claims over time," said Helen Robbins, repatriation director at the Field Museum in Chicago. "Laws and policies are changing."

Researchers, historians and others at museums and universities used to scour the globe for antiquities, artwork and other artifacts.

Digs in such places as Egypt and Greece yielded finds that were shipped to London, New York, Cleveland, Chicago and Paris, where they were displayed for crowds eager to see ancient wonders and art.

But in recent years, a growing number of governments and cultures have asked -- and in some cases, demanded -- that these finds be returned.

"All institutions are concerned," Robbins said. "But I don't think there's any anxiety. If we have title to a collection and if permits were properly obtained and things were done openly, there's no problem."

Working with Indian tribes and other countries has cost museums some works but also has opened the door to new cooperation and loans, said Ford Bell, president of the American Association of Museums.

"Museums are our guardians of our heritage, and we feel a huge responsibility. At the same time, we don't want to do anything offensive to other cultures."

The 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act says that if an institution has remains from a federally recognized tribe and the tribe asks for them back, the two sides must go through a process to determine whether they will be returned.

But what happens when remains belong to a people who predate any known tribe?

That's the case with Ohio State's remains, as well as most of the nearly 7,000 at the Ohio Historical Society and others across the state.

Ohio State's plan to return the remains to Putnam County, W.Va., commissioners for reburial must be approved by a federal committee and the interior secretary.

The plan is one of 11 the committee will consider at its May meeting. In the past 13 years, there had been 48 such requests.

Seventeen years after the graves law was passed, specific regulations on how to handle remains of early cultures were proposed. Some museum representatives say the regulations proposed last year don't ensure that the remains go to those most closely tied to the ancient Indians.

Indian tribes generally support the proposal because it creates a system that eventually will allow them to bury remains of people they consider their predecessors.

Hundreds of comments are being reviewed by the National Park Service, which administers the 1990 law.

The Ohio Historical Society and others have been awaiting regulations before deciding what to do with remains and artifacts found in Hopewell and Adena burial mounds and from other prehistoric cultures.

Read more in the Dispatch

<< A unique anchor discovered

Fiji jewellery box find stuns archaeologists >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Stonehenge Tea Towels - Worldwide delivery

 Stonehenge Tea Towels - Worldwide delivery

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

Latest Visit Logs

  • Eller Edge (426)
    “This stone has an unusual cluster of small cups in a circular arrangement (I'm not sure I buy the id…”
    by bonirex · 24 Aug 2026
  • Skyreholme Wall Stone (413)
    “This is a beast of a stone, with dozens of cups on its upper surface (and in some places down the si…”
    by bonirex · 24 Aug 2026
  • Le Breuil
    “Peyre d'Emale is very close to Le Breuil if you take the gravel roads. Has this led to the creation …”
    by Mick_Connor · 23 Aug 2026
  • Menhir des Demoiselles (Colombiers-sur-Seulles)
    “As TheCaptain notes, this menhir stands on a grassy bank at a road junction east of the village of C…”
    by brianlavelle · 23 Aug 2026
  • Little Balsmith
    “You're not so small Little Balsmith - are you? A towering beauty.”
    by Smac · 23 Aug 2026

"US museums and universities face questions about requests for return of remains" | Login/Create an Account | 3 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Archaeologists question Buffalo reburials by Condros on Wednesday, 15 September 2010
(User Info | Send a Message)
More information regarding the Buffalo, West Virginia site, It seems while planning a new road through the area a "Cave" was discovered, which contained more Native American remains, and artifacts. Putnam County officials having been already embarassed by the conflict of re-burial of the 100's of Native American remains, Decided to "cover Up" the newly discovered site rather than dealing with it and more controversy, so they "covered it up, and re-directed the road away from the cave." One seriously begins to wonder what ever happened to the "scientific minds" in West Virginia ???
[ Reply to This ]

Archaeologists question Buffalo reburials by Anonymous on Wednesday, 23 April 2008
An archeologist on Tuesday criticized Putnam County commissioners for their efforts to return the skeletal remains of about 600 American Indians to West Virginia, saying they had left the scientific community in the dark.

"We have been cut out of the process entirely," said Bob Maslowski, president of the Council for West Virginia Archaeology.

Last month, commissioners received legal control of the skeletal remains, which had been stored at Ohio State University since the mid-1990s.

In the early 1960s, West Virginia's first state archaeologist excavated a site near the present-day Toyota plant in Buffalo. People working on the site eventually found the remains of hundreds of American Indians.

Over the past decade, some people in Putnam County have advocated for the return and reburial of the remains, out of what they say is respect for Indian spirituality. Commissioners intend to rebury the remains at a site near the original excavation.

A 1990 law called the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) allows federally recognized tribes to reclaim Indian remains and artifacts from museums and universities.

The Buffalo remains have been designated as "culturally unidentifiable," meaning they cannot be linked to modern-day tribes.

Maslowski said Tuesday he believes the remains should be stored at the state's new archaeological collections facility in Moundsville, where they could be preserved until DNA analysis can further identify them.

"In your request, we don't see any support from federally recognized tribes [to rebury the remains]," he told commissioners.

County officials contacted various tribes, but none have claimed the remains, Commissioner Joe Haynes said.

http://sundaygazettemail.com/News/200804220632
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Archaeologists question Buffalo reburials by Condros on Thursday, 13 August 2009
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    The sheer arrogance of some "archaeologists" is astounding, Latest update on Buffalo, West Virginia-
    This is hard for anyone with any sense to believe, but it seems that those responsible want to take DNA from the "current residents"- to find out "If there are any descendants" of native Americans that lived in the area before the Colonial contact period , Since the Shawnee were living there since the 1600's, they are referring to an unknown people at least from the 1400's or earlier, Talk about spitting into the wind, Are these morons actually going to believe they have found the one or more possible persons to have matching DNA ??? It sounds more like a stupid delaying tactic in reburial of these ancient peoples remains, and no one will notice- HAH.
    [ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.