Featured: Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Random Image

Britain BC

Britain BC

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 1102 guests and 4 members online.

Sponsors

<< News >> Shell beads point to dawn of modern human behaviour

Submitted by coldrum on Friday, 28 August 2009  Page Views: 2302

DiscoveriesCountry: Algeria We often judge other people based on material possessions - the clothes we wear and the things we own can advertise our wealth, status and social allegiances. But when did we start using our belongings to tell others about ourselves?

A new study by an international team of researchers from France, South Africa, Germany, Israel and the UK has confirmed that 80,000-year-old shell beads found in caves in North Africa represent some of the earliest evidence of the use of personal ornamentation.

The new research shows the shell beads were common across North Africa until they fell out of use around 70,000 years ago. Previously, the shells were known from only a few scattered examples. 'We are no longer looking at isolated or one off events.' says Professor Nick Barton of the University of Oxford, one of the authors of the study. 'We can now document the shells at a number of different locations in North Africa all of about the same age' he adds.

The beads provide evidence that the people alive at the time were acting much like modern humans. 'There is a problem with linking anatomically modern humans with behaviourally modern humans,' Barton explains. 'These people may have looked like us, but were they behaving the same?' he adds.

The presence of the beads suggests the people who made and wore them behaved in ways we would recognise. Using symbolic items like shell beads to communicate ideas about the wearer requires skills found only in modern humans, including a well-developed language and the ability to use abstract concepts.

The researchers analysed 25 beads from four sites in North Africa from the Middle Palaeolithic period. The beads, consisting of the shells of sea snails called Nassarius, had been transported some distance from the marine environment in which they're usually found, and showed evidence of deliberate alterations.

'We found evidence they had been strung together as in a necklace or bracelet,' said Barton. The shells had been deliberately perforated using stone tools and the researchers found distinctive wear patterns which suggested they had been rubbing together. Wear marks around the perforations indicated the shells had been threaded on a string. Several had also been covered with a pigment called red ochre and one shell showed evidence of heating, possibly to alter its colour.
The origins of fashion?

But what purpose did the coloured beads serve? 'What they were signalling, we're not entirely sure.' said Barton. 'Possibly they were an insurance policy, if you had shared access to certain resources and wanted to identify yourself to members of another group.' The beads may also have let wearers identify members of the same social group, preventing unnecessary conflicts.

Alternatively, the beads might have provided personal information about the wearer, such as the wearer's position in the social hierarchy, or that they had passed through puberty and into adulthood.

So do these beads represent the origins of today's fashions? Possibly not, according to the researchers. There is a gap in the archaeological record starting 70,000 years ago, during which no personal ornaments are found. They reappear around 20,000 years later, when humans are beginning to move out of Africa to colonise the rest of the world.

The researchers suggest the gap was due to climate change. As the world slid into another ice age the warm, humid North African climate dried out. As a result, human populations shrank, and cultural innovations such as shell beads may have been lost. Only with the expansion of the human population 20,000 years later were these cultural ideas rediscovered.

The work was partly supported through the RESET (Response of Humans to Abrupt Environmental Transitions) programme, which seeks to examine how climate change affected the evolution and adaptation of our ancestors.

The research was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Source: http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/news/story.aspx?id=517

<< Ohio Historical Society Joins with Regional Organizations - Manage or Staff Prem

China's Prehistoric Archaeology Highlighted In New Research >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Neolithic Britain And Ireland

Neolithic Britain And Ireland

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

Latest Visit Logs

  • Godrevy Headland Barrow
    “Today is a circular walk around the Godrevy headland on a very sunny day. Some lovely clifftop views…”
    by TheCaptain · 14 Jul 2026
  • Iron Smelting Hut Crawcwellt West
    “Easy to find after the big one!”
    by w650marion · 14 Jul 2026
  • Crawcwellt Hut Circle Settlement North
    “Hidden in the tall summer grass! But worth trudging about to find it! Tip - head for the higher gras…”
    by w650marion · 14 Jul 2026
  • Neonteikhos
    “This place actually used to be a major Aeolian city state in the region To get to the site, I par…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026
  • Assos Temple of Athena
    “The temple of Athena is at the acropolis. Apart from the temple of Athena, Assos is a quite large s…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026

"Shell beads point to dawn of modern human behaviour" | Login/Create an Account | 2 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Archaeological study of ostrich eggshell beads collected from SDG site by coldrum on Monday, 04 January 2010
(User Info | Send a Message)
Archaeological study of ostrich eggshell beads collected from SDG site

Ostrich eggshell (OES) beads from SDG site reflect primordial art and a kind of symbolic behavior of modern humans. Two different manufacturing pathways are usually used in the manufacture of OES beads in Upper Paleolithic. Pathway 1 is identified from these collections; blanks are drilled prior to being trimmed to rough discs. Based on stratigraphic data and OSL dating, these ostrich eggshell beads are probably in Early Holocene ( 10 ka BP).

The study has been reported in Volume 54 Issue 21 (November, 2009) of Chinese Science Bulletin . Academic team led by Prof. Gao Xing of Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences carry out this important research.

The discovery of shell beads from some Paleolithic sites in North Africa and South Africa has been taken as archaeological evidence of the oldest human artistic activity and the earliest record of modern human behavior. Nowadays, the issue of primordial art origins, especially in East Asia, is currently a hot topic in academic world. Paleolithic archaeologists are eagerly searching for new material and dating evidence to solve this research question.

This paper presents a comprehensive production chain for analyzing and rebuilding the manufacture stages of OES beads, concludes some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and explores the symbolic meaning of them. Pathway 1 is identified from these collections; blanks are drilled prior to being trimmed to rough discs.

In recent years, many shell beads have been found in some Paleolithic sites, but scholars do not pay more attention to the manufacturing technology of beads and symbolic meaning of them. Based on microscopical observation and experiments, the academic team led by Prof. Gao rebuilt the manufacture stages of OES beads from SDG site, concluded some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and explored the symbolic meaning of them.

According to previous observation and study systems of Western scholars and the specific characters of OES beads from SDG site, this study found that the two pathways of manufacture used in SDG site differed in the order of the drilling and trimming stages. The SDG site predominantly shows blanks drilled before trimming – Pathway 1. Blanks trimmed to circular discs prior to drilling constitute Pathway 2. Pathway 1 comprises four activities falling into eight manufacturing stages as follows: 'blank preparation' (Stages I and II), 'drilling' (Stages III and IV), 'trimming' (Stages V and VI), 'grinding' (Stages VII and VIII).

According to observed attributes and analyzing methods, the academic team conducted mass analysis in three aspects: direction of perforation, diameter and area of OES beads, aperture and external diameters of OES beads. OES beads are mainly drilled from inside of beads, followed by both sides, beads drilled from outside surface and uncertain samples are rare. Directions of perforation are in close relationship with the microstructure of OES. The microstructure of OES makes the outside surface more compact and firmer; furthermore, hominids are difficult in finding out appropriate drilling point by reason of the outside slippery surface of OES, breakage generally occurs when drilled from the outside surface of blanks. Thus, hominids are inclined to drill from the inside surface of OES and avoid high rate of breakage. The change of diameter and area indicates a greater degree of uniformity in production; it reflects the excellent skills of prehistoric artisans. Aperture and external diameters of OES beads indicate that the aperture size presents a greater degree of uniformity in Pathway 1; the beads with bigger and more consistently sized aperture could indicate a relatively excellent skill in bead manufacture. Hominids can hold the standard of beads size and make standardized final beads so as to alter and enhance the appearance of the individuals who wear them.

These OES beads play important roles in modern human behavior. According to the ethnological and archaeological materials, if someone wears personal symbolic ornaments, they used to express wearer's some message to a variety of audiences. The ways and decoration people ornament themselves may indicate their ages, group affiliations, marital status, social standing, level of wealth and so on.

"Mass analysis of OES beads in Paleolithic sites has wider application and perspective. Through analyzing the above aspects by experiments and microscopic observation, scholars can reestablish the manufacture stages of OES beads and explore the symbolic meaning of them" said one journal reviewer. "This study concludes some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and reflect interactions among existing capacities, changing ecological and demographic conditions." said another reviewer.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-12/sicp-aso120609.php
[ Reply to This ]

Tiny ancient shells point to earliest fashion trend by coldrum on Friday, 02 October 2009
(User Info | Send a Message)
Tiny ancient shells point to earliest fashion trend

Shell beads newly unearthed from four sites in Morocco confirm early humans were consistently wearing and potentially trading symbolic jewellery as early as 80,000 years ago. These beads add significantly to similar finds dating back as far as 110,000 in Algeria, Morocco, Israel and South Africa, confirming these as the oldest form of personal ornaments. This crucial step towards modern culture is reported this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS).

A team of researchers recovered 25 marine shell beads dating back to around 70,000 to 85,000 years ago from sites in Morocco, as part of the European Science Foundation EUROCORES programme 'Origin of Man, Language and Languages'. The shells have man-made holes through the centre and some show signs of pigment and prolonged wear, suggesting they were worn as jewellery.

Across all the locations shells were found from a similar time period from the Nassarius genus. That these shells were used similarly across so many sites suggests this was a cultural phenomenon, a shared tradition passed along through cultures over thousands of years. Several of the locations where shells have been found are so far inland that the shells must have been intentionally brought there.

"Either people went to sea and collected them, or more likely marine shell beads helped create and maintain exchange networks between coastal and inland peoples. This shows well-structured human culture that attributed meaning to these things," said Francesco d'Errico, lead author and director of research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). "Organised networks would also assist trading of other items, as well as genetic and cultural exchange – so these shells help reveal the connections between cognition and culture."

For scientists, beadworks are not simply decoration, they also represents a specific technology that conveys information through a shared coded language. It indicates more advanced thinking and the development of modern cultural traits, giving clues to how such innovative behaviours might link to the spread of humans out of Africa.

"The early invention of the personal ornament is one of the most fascinating cultural experiments in human history," d'Errico continued. "The common element among such ornaments is that they transmit meaning to others. They convey an image of you that is not just your biological self."

Until recently the invention of personal ornaments was thought to coincide with the colonisation of Europe some 40,000 years ago, linking advanced cognitive capacity to early human dispersal. Yet this changed with the 2006 discovery of shell beads in Africa and the Near East dating back 35,000 years earlier, showing that symbolic thinking emerged more gradually through human evolution.

Curiously, shell beads disappear from the archaeological record in Africa and the Near East 70,000 years ago, along with other cultural innovations such as engravings on ochre slabs, and refined bone tools and projectile points. They reappear in different forms up to 30,000 years later, with personal ornaments simultaneously re-emerging in Africa and the Near East, and for the first time in Europe and Asia. This may reflect an entirely new and independent phase of population growth with previously unseen innovations allowing a more efficient exploitation of a wider variety of environments.

The temporary disappearance of cultural innovations could well be linked to population decreases during a long period of harsher climate conditions 60,000 to 73,000 years ago. This would have isolated populations, disrupting social and exchange networks.

This study was part of a broad network of 21 research projects and 44 individual research teams from 12 European countries forming the European Science Foundation EUROCORES programme 'Origin of Man, Language and Languages'(OMLL). This highly interdisciplinary collaborative action brought together scientists from a wide range of disciplines including genetics, linguistics, anthropology, archaeology, neurophysiology or cognitive sciences.

Dr Eva Hoogland, EUROCORES coordinator for the cognitive sciences at the European Science Foundation said: "This study presents a very good example of the groundbreaking results that can be gained from an interdisciplinary environment. Some questions, such as those concerning the interconnections between human cognition and culture, can only be addressed if scientists of varying backgrounds join forces. As witnessed by this study, this opens up new avenues for research when it happens on a structural basis, by leading scientists from across Europe."

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-08/esf-tas082609.php
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.