Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

The Ancient Celts, Barry Cunliffe

The Ancient Celts, Barry Cunliffe

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 1317 guests and 5 members online.

Sponsors

<< News >> Rolling stones

Submitted by PaulM on Tuesday, 30 November 2004  Page Views: 6781

StonehengeCountry: England County: Wiltshire Type: Stone Circle

Internal Links:

Stonehenge.
Stonehenge. submitted by dodomad : Publicity photo for Heritage Hikes, copyright English Heritage (Vote or comment on this photo)
A carpenter's new theory on how Stonehenge came about could roll away old theories on Britain's megalithic monument, finds Patrick Weir. For more than 20 years, Derbyshire carpenter Gordon Pipes has been striving to find an answer to a 4,000-year-old question that still confounds archaeologists; namely how, without roads or wheels, did Neolithic man transport 80 sarsen stones, each weighing an average of 30 tons, 20 miles from the Marlborough Downs to Salisbury Plain to construct Stonehenge?

The site also comprises 98 blue stones, each weighing six tons, from the Preseli Mountains in Wales. The question of how these were conveyed over land - it is agreed they must have been ferried in boats along the Severn Estuary and River Avon - is also unanswered. But Pipes is convinced he has found the solution.

"What fired my imagination was a book about the stone statues on Easter Island by Norwegian scientist Thor Heyerdahl," he explains. "Working out how the ancients were able to move such heavy megaliths became an obsession.

"In terms of Stonehenge, theories that one stone could have been dragged a mile a day by 700 men using rope and wooden rollers seemed as viable to me as alien involvement. The rollers wouldn't have taken the weight and the physical effort required would have been super-human.

"It occurred to me that a megalith could be picked up, moved a short distance, put down and moved again. Further research suggested this would be quicker, require less manpower and negate the need for muscle power. Also, the initial inertia the body experiences when attempting to drag large stones, is all but nullified."


Called stone rowing, the procedure involves laying down a number of logs - the number determined by the weight of the stone - in a parallel formation. Resting on supports, the logs are positioned just above the ground. Some are then used to support the stone, while the rest act as a continuous fulcrum for wooden oars, or levers, inserted underneath the stone. By pressing down on the levers, the stone rises two inches clear of the support logs, and when the levers are moved sideways, the stone moves forward.

Pipes tested his theory in his garden. "Four of us carried out this experiment using a four-ton concrete block, four logs and four levers," he explains. "We were able to move the block between six and 12 inches at a time with ease. I then set up a ramp and discovered that the method also worked uphill when using more levers and incorporating a break mechanism."

Mike Pitts, editor of British Archaeology, says: "Few archaeologists ever consider practical issues like moving stones. Gordon's ideas fascinate because they come from an understanding of lifting and moving things, rather than from theories dreamt up at a desk. And while he doesn't underestimate the difficulties facing the Stonehenge builders, neither does he come up with impossibly complicated solutions. It's the first time that someone has come up with anything really sensible for a long time."

Nigel Swift, a founder member of the Stonehengineers group set up to support Pipes, says his theory "rests on the proposition that our ancestors would have been as smart as us and just as keen to minimise effort. If accepted, his work will rewrite the book in terms of the numbers of people required to create megalithic monuments and will make quite a splash. It will take some arguing against."

Pipes is planning two further experiments on Salisbury Plain next summer. The first will be an attempt to move a 10-ton block half a mile in a day, the second repeating this feat with a 40-ton block.

"I believe that stone rowing will provide us with some interesting answers to ancient mysteries such as the pyramids," says Pipes. "It really does have that potential."

Source: The Guardian - Tuesday November 30, 2004

<< Isle of Wight: SeaBritain 2005 and Mesolithic Site discovery

New finds shed light on prehistoric Andean culture >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Children Of The Stones DVD

Children Of The Stones DVD

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

Latest Visit Logs

  • Crawcwellt Kerb Cairn
    “A nightmare to find in the summer tall grasses, but worth it”
    by w650marion · 14 Jul 2026
  • Godrevy Headland Barrow
    “Today is a circular walk around the Godrevy headland on a very sunny day. Some lovely clifftop views…”
    by TheCaptain · 14 Jul 2026
  • Iron Smelting Hut Crawcwellt West
    “Easy to find after the big one!”
    by w650marion · 14 Jul 2026
  • Crawcwellt Hut Circle Settlement North
    “Hidden in the tall summer grass! But worth trudging about to find it! Tip - head for the higher gras…”
    by w650marion · 14 Jul 2026
  • Neonteikhos
    “This place actually used to be a major Aeolian city state in the region To get to the site, I par…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026

"Rolling stones" | Login/Create an Account | 3 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Rolling stones by Anonymous on Wednesday, 01 December 2004
I was there. Mr Pipes has it right!
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Rolling stones by ocifant on Wednesday, 01 December 2004
(User Info | Send a Message)
More details at Stonehengineers
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: Rolling stones by Anonymous on Friday, 03 December 2004
    I believe the method suggested for moving the stones is the most likely way, I have moved logs in our woodyard using this method. Our "Stonehenge" is the four natural peaks of Stoney Stanton, Sapcote,Croft,and Huncote, alas only half of Croft hill remains in south west Leicestershire the others live on as the final dressing on the motorways. Our neolithic settlements used portable standing stones etc, a more practible solution.Arthur, Burbage,Leicestershire.
    [ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.