Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology

Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 1596 guests and 4 members online.

Sponsors

Portal Photographers

Submitted by Thorgrim on Thursday, 16 June 2005  Page Views: 4723

Resources

<< Feature Articles >>

Avebury
Avebury submitted by creators : The photographer herself of that wonderful shot at West Kennet Long Barrow. We were freezing at this point, now there's dedication for you! Time to hit the tea bar. (Vote or comment on this photo)
The distinctive style of regular Portal photographers can often be apparent even without seeing their names - Sem is remarkable for high definition and crispness, Nicola for superb quality of light, Angie for unusual angles, Creators for atmosphere that you can really feel. There are many, many more - perhaps we should run some features on individual photographers - their style and techniques - any nominations? Who are your favourite Portal photographers?

Why not make your own assessments of the pictures that you see on the Portal? A ratings box is shown next to each photograph and all that you have to do is select a number from 1 to 10 to indicate your opinion. Simply select your rating and click! Everyone's opinion is valid and photographers will get valuable feedback if more people enter ratings. The scores are averaged out so if one person give a rating of 10 and another of 6 then the average will be shown as 8.

Each of us will have our own preferences and ways of looking at and valuing photographs. This is my way - you can adopt it if you wish or do something completely different. I must stress that I don't give a rating for most photos and that is not because I don't think that they are any good - its just because I don't feel particularly strongly about them and don't want to make rating them a chore. Its something I do when I feel like it. I rarely give a poor picture a rating unless I think its really bad, so confine myself to higher ratings only:

10 Excellent composition, focus, lighting and atmosphere with that certain something special that says something meaningful about the location

9 Excellent composition, focus, lighting and atmosphere

8 Three qualities are excellent - out of the four shown in 9

7 Two qualities are excellent - out of the four shown in 9

6 One quality is excellent - out of the four shown in 9


Sometimes I just throw all of that out of the window because someone has grabbed a rare and difficult shot. The composition, lighting etc may be dodgy, but the picture is unique and unrepeatable and that makes it special.

That's just my way - you can choose any criteria you like or just rate the photos that appeal to you. Your opinions can count and will be shown to count.

Please add your thoughts on this site

Metallurgical Reports on British and Irish Bronze Age Implements

Metallurgical Reports on British and Irish Bronze Age Implements

Sponsors

More Feature Articles

See all Feature Articles →

"Portal Photographers" | Login/Create an Account | 8 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: by creators on Friday, 17 June 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
I'd certainly like to see the votes used more. Like Thorgrim I only vote if it's a positive vote and I like his evaluation of the 6, 7, 8, 9, and for 10, blown out of the water.

I'd also very much like to see photographers talking about what they do and how they do it, what equipment they use (photos of same?) and how they kit themselves out for a shoot and, oh anything and everything. Just talking about what they do. I nominate you Thorgrim as I know you use film and that is not a beast I have ever used except in Instamatics as a lad, and I'd like to hear more about what you do. No, no, it's alright, no need to thank me. :) It's payback time for using a picture of mine where the ground is drunk. :¬`)

Keith.
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: by Thorgrim on Friday, 17 June 2005
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    I use less film now as I find it easier to clip a Nikon Coolpix on my belt and leave all the heavy stuff behind. Find myself much in the position of the pro photographers on BBC 4's "Digital Picture of Britain" They are given a massive pro digital camera, a compact and a mobile phone camera and set targets. They have years of conventional experience behind them, but have to learn to overcome the restrictions of the new technology before reaping the benefits. I'm on the fence, but fear that film is doomed so I probably have to adapt. Best photographer of all time anywhere was Ansell Adams and he used a massive wooden box of a camera with glass plates and a tripod like Stonehenge. He often photographed landscapes from a platform on the roof of his jeep. I wonder what he would have made of 3 million pixels in his pocket?
    [ Reply to This ]

Re: by Klingon on Friday, 17 June 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
So should we introduce that the editor has to rate a pic after validating?
This would be an example for other users.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: by ocifant on Friday, 17 June 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
I agree hat more use of the ratings system should be used. This article has just made me check my own photos. The vast majority are scored as 0, as I'd expect, but those that do have scores are nearly all 9s and 10s. This is meaningless unless you know how many people have actually rated the photo. Just 1 maybe clicking in the wrong place? Or many people who all thought a shaky shot of a well was so fantastic they had to rate it as 10? I'll never know, but I can guess :)
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: by Thorgrim on Friday, 17 June 2005
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    The number of people who have voted is shown as well as the averaged score. Problem is that most photos receive no votes and so get a zero score, but that doesn't mean that they are poor photos and worth less than a pic getting a score of 1 or more. Just means no one has bothered to vote and so the poor old photographer gets no feedback or encouragement - hence the article appealing for more voters (sound like Mr Blair don't I?)
    [ Reply to This ]
      Re: by ocifant on Friday, 17 June 2005
      (User Info | Send a Message)
      Ah, as ever, you're right. :-)

      I was looking on the 'Your Own Page' to see all 'my' photos and their scores. The number of votes only appears if you look at the individual gallery page. Possibility for an enhancement there?
      [ Reply to This ]

Re: by VirtHist on Friday, 17 June 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
Great to see an article on this subject. I try to rate pictures when I see them but have noticed that very few people do. I know it's not essential, but it's still nice to know that soemone's appreciating your work. Mak
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.