<< News >> Neolithic Humans Studied Insects to Master Farming?
Submitted by Andy B on Thursday, 23 December 2004 Page Views: 1658
Neolithic and Bronze AgeType: Ancient Village or SettlementInternal Links:
i-Newswire reports how a re-examination of the work of archaeologist James Mellaart—conducted by Raymond Lane (founder of superpsychology)—has found that within the period 10,000-4,000 BC, humans may have studied the insect’s role of plant pollinator in order to understand farming.
Architecture and artifacts indicate that humans also adopted some aspects of insect lifestyles—via sympathetic worship—in an attempt to improve their own working lives. At Khirokitia, for example, “Several compounds were found consisting of one large beehive house, and several others used as kitchens, workshops for grinding corn, etc… The general impression is one of great efficiency and good organization” (1965, p. 54).
At Çatal Hüyük, shrine VII has a wall relief of a goddess with two red rings around her pregnant abdomen and a triangular belly button (1967, p. 76)—imitating a bee’s abdomen and stinger, and suggesting that she was equated to the queen bee. Shrine VI.B.8 has a wall painting (1967, p. 123) with many handprints on the bottom, three bull heads at the top and a middle section displaying “…the life-cycle of the bee in a honeycomb with closed cells on the left, from which, in the middle, the bees [indicated by white circles] emerge to fly freely in a field of flowers on the right” (1967, p. 91, 162). The honeycomb is enclosed within two rows of four-fingered hands that Mellaart suspected represented crops (1967, p. 163). This shows that the people had intimate knowledge of the beehive and that bees played a role in fertilising crops. Lane believes that the entire theme suggests a spiritual hierarchy of humans on the bottom, gods on the top, and bees as the intermediary between the two. A wall painting of the city itself, in shrine VII (1967, p. 133), is composed of clear cell-like units—suggesting that the honeycomb may have been its inspiration. Sympathetic worship of insects also seems to have continued on in the later Hacilar settlement. Here, the mother goddess figurines (1965, p. 108) had definite insect eyes: large ellipsoids that stretch round to the sides of the head. (Similar examples also come from Can Hasan and Urartu.) And one example of pottery painting (1965, p. 110) has a stylised bee head, and four red rings around each of two bulging sides with handles—in imitation of bee abdomens and stingers.
Lane believes that insect sympathetic worship may have begun as early as 35,000 years ago. This is when human social behaviour changed to include division of labour, artwork, and the noting of natural cycles. Termites, bees (honey), and some ants would have been used as food sources, and the people would have realised that the large insect society with its queen resembled their own society with its queen (and mother goddess). And the bulging, pregnant Venus figurines—some even with segmented bodies—may have represented the fertile qualities of the insect queen and its bulging, egg-filled body.
So for a short period of history, humans engaged in sympathetic worship of insects to learn farming. This may seem like strange behaviour, but it was their way of studying nature. After mastering the complexities of farming—by about 4000 BC—sympathetic worship of insects subsided, bees were domesticated, and newer advances fuelled social growth. Lane says, “Up till now archaeologists have concentrated on how humans related to animals—as in tool development, artwork and domestication. But humans’ relationship to insects may have been just as important—if not more so, since you can not only learn about farming from insects but also about a more intense form of social organisation (from superorganisms). So this is a valuable area for further research”.
Bibliography:
Mellaart, James, Earliest Civilizations of the Near East, Thames and Hudson, London, 1965.
Mellaart, James, Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia, Thames and Hudson, London, 1967.
For over twenty years Raymond Lane has developed superpsychology as both an individual and social psychology, and as a tool for exploring the evolution of the human species.
Note: From our bonkers theory of the week service
We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.