Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Random Image

The Quest for the Shaman: Shape-shifters, Sorcerers and Spirit-healers of Ancient Europe

The Quest for the Shaman: Shape-shifters, Sorcerers and Spirit-healers of Ancient Europe

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 823 guests and 4 members online.

Sponsors

<< News >> 'Concrete ' evidence at Stonehenge

Submitted by Jez on Thursday, 28 February 2002  Page Views: 5280

StonehengeMost of the one million visitors who visit Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain every year believe they are looking at untouched 4,000-year-old remains. But virtually every stone was re-erected, straightened or embedded in concrete between 1901 and 1964, says a British doctoral student.

"What we have been looking at is a 20th-century landscape, reminiscent of what Stonehenge might have looked like thousands of years ago," says Brian Edwards, a student at the University of the West of England in Bristol.

Stonehenge isn't the only ancient site to have been transformed in recent years, he says. "Even many of the local people in Avebury weren't aware that a lot of the stones were put up in the 1930s," he told New Scientist.

The major reconstructions that took place at Stonehenge and Avebury early last century couldn't be repeated at a major site today, thinks Edwards. "But it probably is happening in small museums and heritage centres up and down the country," he says.


Drastic renovations


English Heritage says it is now considering covering the Stonehenge alteration programme in detail in the next edition of its official guidebook to the site. A decision not to include the work in official guides was taken in the 1960s, says Dave Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist.

The first restoration project took place in 1901. A leaning stone was straightened and set in concrete, to prevent it falling.

More drastic renovations were carried out in the 1920s. Under the direction of Colonel William Hawley, a member of the Stonehenge Society, six stones were moved and re-erected.

Cranes were used to reposition three more stones in 1958. One giant fallen lintel, or cross stone, was replaced. Then in 1964, four stones were repositioned to prevent them falling.

The 1920s 'restoration' was the most "vigorous", says Christopher Chippindale of the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. "The work in the 1920s under Colonel William Crawley is a sad story," he says.


Fine line


Edwards thinks the public needs to be told - or reminded - about restorations to buildings or sites considered by many people to be pristine.

"We have an obligation to be honest and talk about the whole history of a site," he says. "In quite a number of cases, there is a huge difference between what historians know and what the public consciousness is about those sites."

In many cases, the line between what can be considered essential restoration work, and significant rebuilding, is unclear, says Edwards. "There is always the question of how far do you go?"

From: New Scientist

<< Stone Age Humans: Real Nutcrackers

Three big stanes oan Bardowie Moor >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Explore Wales with the amazing Megalithic Portal smartphone app

Explore Wales with the amazing Megalithic Portal smartphone app

Sponsors

More News

See all News →

Latest Visit Logs

  • Neonteikhos
    “This place actually used to be a major Aeolian city state in the region To get to the site, I par…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026
  • Assos Temple of Athena
    “The temple of Athena is at the acropolis. Apart from the temple of Athena, Assos is a quite large s…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026
  • Symi Castle
    “Requires a moderately steep climb to the castle. Not much ancient remains are visible, some medieva…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026
  • Mausoleum of Hecatomnus
    “The site and museum was open but access into the tomb was not when I visited”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026
  • Incirliin Cave
    “Need to walk quite a bit of steps. More of a natural wonder with stalagmites and stalagtites than a…”
    by longhintim · 13 Jul 2026

"'Concrete ' evidence at Stonehenge" | Login/Create an Account | 2 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: 'Concrete ' evidence at Stonehenge by Anonymous on Thursday, 17 April 2014
Yes But the point is work has been carried out , its not original as they are making out.
Of there remaining stones almost all have been moved dismantled , re erected as "they" think they would have been .

And where are the stones they took away ? does anyone know ? I believe the firm in Alton Hampshire who had the contract still have some pictures (there name escapes me ) .
If they were remaking the circle why remove the outer outer stones(the circle outside the now called outer circle) why not "restore" them to there original places.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: 'Concrete ' evidence at Stonehenge by kooljeff on Thursday, 21 March 2002
(User Info | Send a Message)
Oh dear, how do I comment upon this without appearing a philistine? Oh what the hell, just jump in.

My overall reaction is - so what?

The way this news story was bandied around was that Stonehenge was a 20th century creation. It wasn't. Someone just put a few pieces of the puzzle back together.

I remember my father taking us to Stonehenge back in the late 50s/early 60s. In those days you just parked on the grass verge walked over to the stones and roamed, explored. It fuelled my young imagination, the standing stones were huge, rough, lichen encrusted. I remember touching the stones and feeling - something! As the years went on I kept abreast of the latest findings and news. I am afraid I am a heretic. As far as I am concerned they can restore it all to its former glory.

Putting the existing pieces together is one thing I do not object to. What I would object to is replacing any missing pieces with replicas or concrete. No one objects to the fact that Newgrange or the Parthenon have been put back together. If anything it makes them more astounding. Ancient Britons did not have motorised vehicles or huge cranes to lift these giants into place. At best they had copper and stone tools to shape and style them (think of the work on just one of the mortice & tenon sections on the lintel/uprights)!

Nor was this work secret. Anyone looking at 17th to 19th century images of the stones could deduce that they had been re-erected. I myself seem to recall, dimly, some work going on when I was a child.

The authors of this 'story' seem to think that there is some sort of x-files conspiracy going on here. There isn't. Does the fact that the majority of the public are unaware of this process diminish their response to the stones? No, not a bit. Seeing them in situ with some hint of their original shape lends power to their understanding, and imagination, about the stones.

Perhaps there is some six year old kid out there who will come to Stonehenge and will take a flight of imagination, or get a mystical feeling or an interest in the past that will serve them well into later life. And that is more important than the fact that perhaps the stones are not 100% acurately placed.
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.