Featured: New Book: Astrometrology: The Science of Ancient Metrology by Christopher Willett

New Book: Astrometrology: The Science of Ancient Metrology by Christopher Willett

Random Image

The Quest for the Shaman: Shape-shifters, Sorcerers and Spirit-healers of Ancient Europe

The Quest for the Shaman: Shape-shifters, Sorcerers and Spirit-healers of Ancient Europe

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 613 guests and 8 members online.

Sponsors

Stonehenge tunnel row set to flare up again

Submitted by Andy B on Sunday, 23 September 2001  Page Views: 736

Stonehenge

<< Sites under Threat >>

Maev Kennedy arts and heritage correspondent
Monday September 17, 2001 - The Guardian

The festering row over the future of Stonehenge is about to flare up again as the National Trust is urged by members to abandon plans for a new road tunnel at the site, on which millions have already been spent in consultancy fees and planning meetings.
A resolution for next month's AGM is tactfully worded, but implicitly a bitter criticism of the trust's stewardship of Stonehenge.

Wiltshire archaeologist Kate Fielden, a member of a coalition of archaeologists and environmentalists which is deeply sceptical of the plans, accused the trust of being "economical with the facts", specifically of misleading members over the potential impact of the road plans. She is not a proposer of the motion, but supports its aims.

Although the monument itself is managed by English Heritage, the trust owns thousands of acres of surrounding countryside, including hundreds of smaller monuments, which are crucial to the plan to restore the stone circle to an open downland setting. The entire site is a Unesco world heritage site, ranked among the world's most valuable and sensitive areas.

What to do about Stonehenge has been a thorn in the side of the National Trust and English Heritage, and successive governments, for decades.

In 1989 the parliamentary public accounts committee condemned the present situation - with the monument clenched between the A303 trunk road and the minor A344, and minimal visitor facilities - as "a national disgrace".

An agreement was reached, after years of argument, planning meetings and reports, to close the lesser road, scrap the present visitor facilities for an interpretative centre out of sight of the stones, and bury the main road in a tunnel.

Consultants for the highways agency have another year to produce detailed plans. The agency is proposing a two kilometre tunnel, with entrance portals outside the saucer-shaped plain around the stones, but still within the world heritage site.

Some objectors, including the influential Wiltshire Archaeological Society, are demanding a tunnel twice as long under the entire site.

However, the resolution put down for the trust's annual general meeting by physicist Christopher Gillham and 14 other members, takes the position that there should be no new road building, as this would increase traffic.

The council of the trust has rejected the argument, and urged members to vote against it.

A trust spokesman said no final decision could be reached until the details of the final road plans are complete. Guardian Story

Please add your thoughts on this site

Cornovia: Ancient Sites of Cornwall and Scilly, Craig Weatherhill

Cornovia: Ancient Sites of Cornwall and Scilly, Craig Weatherhill

Sponsors

More Sites under Threat

See all Sites under Threat →

"Stonehenge tunnel row set to flare up again" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Concerns of ICOMOS-UK regarding Stonehenge by Andy B on Sunday, 23 September 2001
(User Info | Send a Message)
Website editor's note: Further to its position statement issued in February 2000, ICOMOS-UK, the body responsible for safeguarding the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, has now expressed a number of concerns about the way the Stonehenge Master Plan is proceeding...

Concerns of ICOMOS-UK regarding Stonehenge
1. That the options for routing the A303 at Stonehenge be assessed on equal terms. (On present information, such options would appear to be the 4 km bored tunnel, a 2 km bored tunnel, and the 2 km cut and cover tunnel.)

2. That due regard is paid to the importance of the World Heritage Site as a whole, and not simply to that part closest to the stones.

3. That there should be real "joined up thinking" on the part of central government, with a particular focus upon the responsibility of the State Party to respect its duty under the World Heritage Convention to ensure the protection, conservation, and presentation of the Site, to the utmost of its resources.

4. That the current position regarding the "Master Plan" should be clarified (eg the situation on the original position for the drop-off point at Fargo), and the whole subsumed in a normal unified Management Plan process as soon as possible.

July 2001
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.