Featured: Exploring Avebury: The Essential Guide - New Expanded Edition!

Exploring Avebury: The Essential Guide - New Expanded Edition!

Das Raetiastein GPS by Thomas Walli

Das Raetiastein GPS by Thomas Walli

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 1528 guests and 1 members online.

Sponsors

Encouraging signs to protect sites from plough damage

Submitted by Andy B on Saturday, 26 July 2003  Page Views: 4696

Site Watch

<< Sites under Threat >>

Plough Damaged Long Barrow
Plough Damaged Long Barrow submitted by Andy B : Ripping Up History English Heritage campaign on archaeology under the plough. Plough damaged long barrow in the Test Valley Copyright EH/Centre for Archaeology (Vote or comment on this photo)
RIPPING UP HISTORY - English Heritage Launches Campaign to Encourage Farmers to Protect, not Plough, Archaeological Sites at Risk Today (25 July 2003) Dr Simon Thurley, Chief Executive of English Heritage, launched "Ripping Up History," a campaign to save thousands of fragile archaeological remains throughout the country put at risk by intensive agriculture. For more images go to our eGallery and search for Ripping Up History

Dr Thurley called for a concerted effort by the Government, archaeologists and farmers to avert what currently represents one of the greatest threats to Britain's archaeological heritage, the only evidence we have for most of our human history.

Since 1945 many ancient sites, including some of the oldest visible monuments in our landscape, have been destroyed or are being seriously damaged - ploughed up or degraded by increasingly powerful farm machinery and ever more intensive cultivation.

Neolithic long barrows, Roman towns and villas, Anglo-Saxon cemeteries, medieval field systems - a patchwork of our past thousands of years in the making - have all suffered and are continuing to suffer. Even many of our most valuable archaeological sites do not escape - today nearly 3000 nationally important scheduled monuments are being cultivated. Although legislation gives protection to these monuments from most threats, in many cases it permits them to be ploughed, even though it can be a major cause of damage to fragile and irreplaceable archaeological remains.

In launching the campaign document at the British Academy, Dr Thurley said: "Modern intensive ploughing has arguably done more damage in six decades than traditional agriculture did in the preceding six centuries. We are, quite literally, ripping up our history. In doing so we are also doing irreparable damage to the character and fascination of our much-loved countryside. We need a new strategy to protect threatened archaeological sites under cultivation. It must have the support of farmers and in return, must properly reward them for their good stewardship of these sites.

"We cannot blame the farmers for what has been happening. They have only been doing what society has asked and agricultural policy has dictated. In the future we look to farmers working in concert with government to be the solution.

"There is no quick fix but there are three key actions which will help secure a future for our past:

* over-haul of current laws, which are ineffective in protecting scheduled monuments from cultivation. While this does not mean ploughing on all of them must stop, we do need a plan for each site which is based on a clear understanding of the risk they face;

* no additional important and well-preserved sites should be turned over to the plough.

* greater emphasis on protecting archaeology in the new generation of agricultural schemes that will reward farmers who care for the landscape and environment;

"These are the first steps on what is going to be a long journey. Unless we take them, the treasured rema ins of previous generations will not be passed on to future ones."

A national Monuments at Risk survey undertaken by English Heritage in 1998 showed that, since 1945, agriculture has been the single biggest cause of uncontrolled loss amongst archaeological sites - and the problem is continuing apace:

* 10% of destruction and 30% of damage to archaeological sites in the last 50 years was due to agriculture. One third of all recorded sites in rural areas remain under the plough;

* between 1950 and 2001 the area of permanent grassland in England fell by 637,000 acres - an area 17 times the Isle of Wight, containing an estimated 14,000 archaeological sites;

* New areas are continually being subjected to deeper ploughing for root crops;

* modern tractors can be 10 times more powerful and eight times heavier than 1940's models, giving them the capacity to destroy in hours what has survived for centuries.

"Ripping Up History" includes examples of sites damaged by ploughing, including an exquisite Roman mosaic floors at Dinnington in Somerset, heavily scored by deep ploughing, and numerous prehistoric burial mounds.

Precious objects are also at risk. Only two out of 39 Bronze Age metalwork hoards recovered from Norfolk in the last 30 years had not been disturbed by agriculture. The magnificent 4,000 year old gold cup, discovered in a field at Ringlemere in Kent and recently bought by the British Museum, had been distorted by the impact of a plough.

The character of whole landscapes has been damaged by intensive cultivation, as in Padbury, Buckinghamshire, where medieval ridge and furrow (well-preserved in the 1950s), hedgerows and field trees have been destroyed.

The campaign coincides with the publication of a consultation paper on the Review of Heritage Protection, which the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is undertaking in partnership with English Heritage. The Review is aimed at improving and refocusing the ways we protect our past.

Heritage Minister Andrew McIntosh said: " Archaeological sites contain a wealth of material that chart the development of civilisation in this country. It is vitally important that we do as much as we can to protect this heritage so that future generations will have a better understanding of our history."

Many organisations are supporting English Heritage's campaign:

Tom Oliver - Head of Rural Policy at the Campaign to Protect Rural England

"The richness of the English countryside is the accumulation of the lives and times of many generations. A legacy of careful management is written right across the landscape. If we only stop and look, we can experience this treasure for ourselves. But this richness, laid down over millennia, can be spent in an afternoon's tillage. It will take as many millennia again to lay down so rich a record and what we lose now diminishes the landscape forever. The Campaign to Protect Rural England counts the protection of our historical and archaeological record in the landscape as fundamental to our purpose. We see its protection as a crucial part of the contribution of farming in the future."

Dr Francis Pryor MBE - President of the Council for British Archaeology

"We warmly welcome this initiative by English Heritage to campaign for better care of our rural archaeology. This is an issue the CBA has been pursuing for 25 years. We cannot go on standing by as thousands of irreplaceable ancient sites are progressively destroyed by ploughing, encouraged by CAP grants. Farmers have only been doing what the system encourages and allows. We urgently call on DEFRA to take the golden opportunity offered by agri-environment reform to give all farmers the information and financial incentives they need to conserve our archaeological heritage - while it is still there. We haven't got long."

Harvey Sheldon - Chair of RESCUE, The British Archaeological Trust

"Ancient farmsteads, burial grounds and field systems throughout England have been left unprotected from the ravages of the plough to the point where many have been destroyed with little or no record. RESCUE greatly welcomes this vital English Heritage initiative. If it succeeds, it promises protection for archaeological sites on agricultural land equivalent to that already achieved for those subject to urban redevelopment. If it doesn't, our abilities to investigate and understand the patterns of England's ancient landscape will be lost forever."


Ken Smith - Chair of the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers

"Our cultural heritage - which makes our landscapes distinct - is a major contributor to the rural economy. Destruction and damage reduces that contribution. The Association applauds English Heritage's initiative to focus people's attention on the devastation of archaeological sites by ploughing over the last 50 years, as farmers have responded to incentives encouraging greater production of cheaper food. We look forward to co-operating with the farming and conservation communities to ensure that good stewardship is rewarded. We look to DCMS and DEFRA to work together to demonstrate Government's commitment to modernise protection of the heritage and to deliver a sustainable farming industry, through new agri-environment schemes and a review of environmental impact assessment regulations, that will safeguard what remains of our irreplaceable cultural heritage."

Christopher Catling - Director, Heritage Link

"We hope the review of heritage protection initiated by the Department of Culture Media and Sport will help bring an end to the situation whereby farmers can continue to plough to destruction nationally significant scheduled ancient monuments. We should encourage farmers to be stewards of the heritage, not destroyers of it, and we should reward them for their care."

Alison Taylor - Institute of Field Archaeologists

"Since the early 1990s Government policy has ensured that archaeological remains threatened by development are either protected or excavated if preservation is not possible. In stark contrast, under recent agricultural policies farmers have almost been encouraged to destroy fragile remains on a year-by-year basis over huge areas of countryside. Field archaeologists have had to watch as medieval villages have been levelled, Anglo-Saxon jewellery dragged from burials to the land surface, and prehistoric burial mounds turned into mere marks in the soil. It's marvellous that English Heritage is making this stand. Changes to the pattern of subsidies so that farmers are rewarded for their role as stewards of the countryside will make a huge difference to the survival of our historic environment."

Notes

For the "Ripping Up History" leaflet see:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/default.asp?WCI=WebItem&WCE=3605

Hard copies are available from English Heritage Customer Services PO Box 569, Swindon SN2 2YP, telephone: 0870 3331181. Ask for product no. 50791.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is reviewing its current environmental farming (agri-environment) schemes with the intention of launching new schemes in 2005. This follows proposals by the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food, set up after the Foot and Mouth outbreak, that farmers should be offered support for their management of the countryside. These new schemes have the potential to deliver major benefits for the heritage of the countryside.

These changes also coincide with the conclusion of European Union negotiations on reform of the Common Agricultural Policy which proposes the "de-coupling" of farming subsidies from intensive production. In return farmers will be required to abide by certain environmental requirements.

Current Ancient Monuments legislation is provided by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 and the Ancient Monuments (Class Consent) Order 1994. Following public consultation on the Review of Heritage Protection, the Government hopes to bring out a White Paper early in 2004. The consultation paper is on the DCMS website.

Note: We've been following this issue for a long time and this is excellent news. Pity it can't bring back all the sites already flattened by field clearance etc.

Please add your thoughts on this site

Current Archaeology Book of the Year 2019!

Current Archaeology Book of the Year 2019!

Sponsors

More Sites under Threat

See all Sites under Threat →

"Encouraging signs to protect sites from plough damage" | Login/Create an Account | 2 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
FARMERS CALL FOR HELP TO PROTECT HISTORIC SITES by Andy B on Friday, 25 July 2003
(User Info | Send a Message)
National Farmers' Union news release, 25 July 2003

Farmers today pledged to work with English Heritage to investigate how more effective protection can be given to ancient sites buried beneath farmland in Britain.

It follows campaigning by the government's own agency for greater financial support to be given to farmers working land that covers scheduled monuments, in line with changes to the Common Agriculture Policy.

Farmers are currently legally permitted to plough such sites already in cultivation.

NFU environment chairman John Seymour said: "We recognise with English Heritage that changes to farming policy at home and in Europe provide a useful opportunity to revisit this issue. But we need to ensure that changes bring benefits for farmers and our heritage. We need to use language that encourages rather than undermines partnership."

The NFU also used the opportunity to call on Defra, and Tessa Jowell's Department for Culture, Media and Sport to work with local authorities and archaeologists to ensure farmers are told about the location and importance of remains.

John Seymour added: "In the majority of cases, damage that has been caused to these sites has been the result of farmers not being informed about the sites rather than as a result of any malicious intent.

"Ploughing itself has uncovered many sites that were previously unknown, and farmers have volunteered the information to local archaeologists. We hope that the many farmers who already work with English Heritage to chart and protect these finds continue to do so."

Road building, housing developments and service providers also pose a considerable threat to the country's scheduled monuments.

Notes to editors:

For case studies of landowners who farm sites with scheduled monuments, contact the NFU Press Office on 020 7331 7387.

See http://www.nfu.org.uk
[ Reply to This ]

CBA Urges Government to Stop the Rape of Britain's History by Andy B on Friday, 25 July 2003
(User Info | Send a Message)
Welcoming a new leaflet setting out the problems of plough-damage to archaeological sites published by English Heritage , the Council for British Archaeology today issued its own statement decrying the rape of Britain's history through subsidized farming.

The British countryside has been shaped by people since they started farming 6000 years ago. Our own history is etched into the form and fabric of the landscape - much of it is visible, but much is buried. Over 80% of our history since farming began has no written record, and can only be studied through its physical remains.

Popular interest in archaeology has never been higher and the countryside contains by far the greatest diversity and chronological depth of our past. Such remains are as irreplaceable as historical documents - and far more vulnerable. A Bronze Age barrow that has stood for 4000 years can be destroyed forever in an afternoon. Archaeological sites can never be security copied; they will never repopulate the landscape through breeding. We can only conserve what there is, where it is.

The problem of plough damage has been a growing concern of archaeologists for 25 years, but it is only in the last ten years that government bodies have begun to quantify the problem and think seriously about how to tackle it.

The rate of damage is alarming:
* Earthworks in cultivation are typically denuded by as much as 2-5cm per year
* Arable cultivation and peat shrinkage in fenland truncates sites at 2-3cm per year2

The extent of damage and vulnerability to damage is appalling even in our most precious archaeological landscapes:
* 65% of archaeological sites in arable areas are at medium or high risk of damage
* 45% of all sites within the Avebury World Heritage Site are threatened by ploughing, rising to 95% in some topographical zones

And the means of addressing the problem have to date been utterly inadequate:
* Agri-environment schemes cover only 8% of farmland, and within that only 2-7% of agreements are in areas where sites are at high risk of damage from cultivation2
* A legislative anomaly allows farmers to carry on cultivating scheduled monuments to the same depth even though this may be damaging

Dr Francis Pryor MBE, President of the Council for British Archaeology said:
"We warmly welcome this initiative by English Heritage to campaign for better care of our rural archaeology. The CBA has been pursuing this issue for 25 years. The Government cannot go on standing by as thousands of irreplaceable ancient sites are progressively destroyed by ploughing, encouraged by CAP grants. Farmers have only been doing what the system encourages and allows. We urgently call on DEFRA to take the golden opportunity offered by agri-environment reform to give all farmers the information advice and financial incentives they need to conserve our archaeological heritage - while it is still there. We haven't got long."

George Lambrick, Director of the CBA and co-author of a recent research report on the issue commissioned by DEFRA said:
"You would not go into all our greatest history libraries each year and - encouraged by Government subsidy - rip a few more pages out of quarter of the books. Yet that - in effect - is what we are doing to tens of thousands of archaeological sites that are gradually being ploughed up to grow our food. Occasionally a whole 'book' is destroyed when a barrow is flattened; more commonly a few pages are removed and shredded as layers get eroded and jumbled up into the topsoil - sometimes singly, sometimes in batches - each loss making the book more difficult to read. DEFRA are now beginning to take this issue seriously, but it is going to take concerted efforts and a lot more resources to inform, advise and support farmers in safeguarding our history in areas of high agricultural production."

The problem is not the fault of farmers, but the system they work under. The CBA is calling on Government to implement a ten-point action plan to help farmers tackle the problem:

Responsibility
1. Conservation of the historic environment must become a core environmental objective for DEFRA and the Environment Agency in line with their statutory responsibilities
2. DEFRA must provide the significant resources needed to stop the destruction of the heritage that indirectly arises from the massive tax-payers' subsidies paid to farmers

CAP and agri-environment reform
3. Under new CAP provisions there must be a major shift in agricultural subsidy towards promoting environmentally responsible farming to minimise destruction of our history.
4. Set-aside requirements should no longer be a form of subsidising farmers 'to do nothing' but should be targeted at long-term safeguarding of irreplaceable archaeological sites.

Heritage legislation
5. The legislative anomaly by which farmers can continue destructive ploughing of scheduled monuments must be replaced with support for proactive, protective management.

Information and advice
6. DEFRA must treat provision of environmental information and advice as a core investment in education and training for sustainable farming, not an administrative overhead.
7. Local Government historic environment information and advisory services must be put on a statutory footing with adequate resources - including funding from DEFRA - to deliver the information and advice farmers need to safeguard their heritage.

Strengthening Codes of Good Farming Practice
8. There should be a much clearer, stronger guide to Good Farming Practice for Conservation - including the Historic Environment and its integration with other environmental issues.
9. Non-subsidised areas of agriculture like potato growing should not be exempt from Good Farming Practice.

Monitoring
10. The state of the historic environment in rural areas must be monitored more effectively to check the effectiveness of measures to protect sites and to inform policy development.


Notes for editors

1. The Council for British Archaeology is an educational charity that promotes knowledge, appreciation and care of the historic environment for present and future generations on a UK-wide basis. It has a membership of over 520 heritage organisations representing over 3.5million people, and c.10,000 directly subscribing individuals of all ages. CBA institutional members represent national, regional and local bodies concerned with the whole historic environment encompassing the state, professional, academic, museum and voluntary sectors.

2. In 1977 the CBA published Archaeology and Agriculture an analysis of plough damage issues. Ever since then the CBA has been pressing Government to address the problem through the development of agri-environment schemes and other reforms. The CBA helped initiate and contribute to a major DEFRA research study on the issues of the management of archaeological sites under cultivation. Currently the CBA, along with English Heritage and the Association of Local Government Archaeological officers is currently contributing archaeological advice to 3 DEFRA working groups looking at how agri-environment schemes can be expanded and improved.

3. Section 17 of the 1986 Agriculture Act, obliges the Secretary of State to seek to achieve
'a reasonable balance' between a) the promotion and maintenance of a stable and efficient agricultural industry; b) the economic and social interests of rural areas; c) the conservation and enhancement of the natural beauty and amenity of the countryside (including its flora and fauna and geological and physiographical features) and of any features of archaeological interest there; and d) the promotion of the enjoyment of the countryside by the public'

4. The Key National Priorities of the English Rural Development Programme includes (under NP3) 'the protection and enhancement through appropriate management of historic and archaeological features of international, national and local importance, and their settings, in particular by conservation and repair of ancient monuments and landscapes at risk.'

5. Following proposals by the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food that farmers should be offered support for their environmental management of the countryside The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is reviewing its current agri-environment schemes with the intention of launching new schemes in 2005. Doing more to safeguard the historic environment emerged as an important issue which is being considered by DEFRA in its Review.

6. Following negotiations on reform of the Common Agricultural Policy The European Union has proposed the "de-coupling" of farming subsidies from intensive production. In return farmers will be required to abide by certain environmental requirements. This provides an important opportunity to expand support for environmentally friendly farming.

7. Current Ancient Monuments legislation is provided by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 and the Ancient Monuments (Class Consent) Order 1994. There is a current review of Review of Heritage Protection, which includes the Class Consent Order. Following public consultation, the Government hopes to publish a White Paper early in 2004.
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.