I agree, He (MPP) and his team for some reason seem to have got it into their heads that the "supposed" massive stone circle (It would have been the 3rd largest in the country if it was ever there) that they believe once stood here was purposely dismantled and taken to the Stonehenge site to become the famous "bluestones"
6 (stone)holes without proving any stones stood in them proves nothing, even if stones once stood in them it could have been prehistoric people moving around the stones still to be found at the site (it's the Earthworms Fault, it's got large gaps, it might never have been completed, all totally laughable), I believe the phrase for what he and his team are doing would be "clutching at straws"
It's unproven theory upon unproven theory, which is quite frankly common with the famous telly archaeologists nowadays.
This is certainly ironic because the archaeologists on telly before these (well paid) fools where totally fact based to the point of boring, and here lies the answer - making headlines so more people watch the program/come to whatever event, as viewing figures/headlines/selling tickets definitely in these days come before the facts. I have been to the site and don't believe the stone circle they "see in their heads" ever stood here, At best one may have been started but never finished but I do imagine various stone settings might have been placed here at various times in the prehistoric, with the national tale of stones been moved around and taken off to build local walls/roads leaving the stones we are left with today.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road