Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
An encouraging excerpt from the report:
"Lastly, there are additional unidentified shapes and 'shadows' in the data sets which in future may prove to be of importance. We have had great success in revealing a number of new carvings, but there are still features which are very suggestive of prehistoric artwork and do not appear natural. These shapes may represent highly eroded carvings, but they were excluded from the feature list because we were unable to adequately define their limits and form. With further development of the techniques outlined in this project, it might be feasible to clarify the nature of the unidentified shapes noted in the data set."
Could some of those relate to Stone 16, I wonder?
(I've saved and downloaded most of the report now [apart from the technical stuff] and ring-bound it properly today. It makes it easier to browse through, and highlight the areas of interest.)
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road