Featured: Explore Scotland (and everywhere else) with our Megalithic Portal iPhone app

Explore Scotland (and everywhere else) with our Megalithic Portal iPhone app

Random Image

A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl

A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 627 guests and 3 members online.

Sponsors

What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill?

Submitted by Andy B on Wednesday, 09 May 2001  Page Views: 9180

Neolithic and Bronze Age

<< Sites under Threat >>

Since last June a large void has opened in the top of Silbury Hill, Avebury, Wiltshire. The fact that this hole has grown from around 2 meters in diameter to nearly 10 meters has raised concerns of local people, and Pagan organisations for whom Silbury is a key sacred site. In frustration, some campaigners have proposed a demonstration at the site on Saturday May 19th.

The principle problem has been a lack of information passing to the public, both about what is being done to remedy the situation, and the problems faced by English Heritage in attempting to prevent the potential collapse of this internationally important site which is part of the Stonehenge/Avebury World Heritage Site.

We are attempting to assist in this situation by publicising what we have learned from conversations with English Heritage.

The root of the problem seems to lie in series of shafts and trenches that have been dug into the monument since the 18th century. Recent wet weather has accelerated the collapse of at least one shaft. But the problems in remedying this situation are considerable.

An attempt to cover the top of the monument to keep rain off the eroded area has proved to be ineffective, and indeed by covering one part of the monument, concentrated run off of water onto the fragile structure (which is also a Site of Special Scientific Interest) may have exacerbated the situation. Moreover, the weight of any capping may actually cause/have caused further damage.

In order the consolidate the site, English Heritage faces the problem of knowing the extent of the voids within the hill, which potentially, we understand, may resemble a Swiss cheese! To this end the relatively novel technique of seismic survey is being adopted in the hope that a three dimensional model of the inside of the Hill can be generated. However, the effectiveness of the technique and just what is likely to be found remain unclear. We understand that the tendering process for this survey will be completed at the end of May and that the one month programme of work is likely to take place in June/July, with results becoming available in August.

In the mean time, parallel work is beginning on the engineering solution to the situation, but again this is fraught with problems. No project of this kind has been undertaken before and whilst the simple filling of a single shaft would be relatively straightforward, a more complex series of voids within the hill would create a difficult problem both archaeologically and in terms of engineering. We understand that a number of techniques are being considered, but engineering considerations must be weighed against both potential damage to archaeology and the need to make any works reversible in the light of future potential for long term care and or research on the monument.

We understand that a rescue excavation on the top of the shaft is also to take place within the next week or so.

It is hoped that English Heritage will carry out repair works in the autumn, once the nature of the situation is clear. It appears essential that such works are carried out before next winter when further bad weather could seriously exacerbate the situation. However these works may end up being of a remedial nature since the long-term protection of the monument may require years of research - there is, after all, only one Silbury Hill!

In the meantime, the situation is being exacerbated by some individuals who, despite fences and the exhortation of Pagan organisations, are entering the damaged area and climbing into the top of the shaft. Not only does this cause further damage to the site but also is a potential risk to the lives of those involved. Unfortunately, the size of the monument makes it extremely difficult to keep determined individuals out and we, along with other bodies and individuals, would exhort everyone to stay away from the Hill until repairs can be carried out.

If there is any criticism we would level it is that the reaction of the Department of Culture Media and Sport, and its bureaucracy, has been typically too slow. Much of what is being done now to remedy the situation should have happened or at least begun last summer when the problem first came to light. This would seem to be a familiar problem in the current climate where one can think of many examples of failure to act rapidly enough to maintain the infrastructure of Great Britain (of which its cultural heritage is an integral part). Moreover, there seems to been a dearth of information and a reluctance to keep the public fully informed as to what is happening and what steps are being taken to remedy this situation. That a degree of openness now seems to be emerging is to be welcomed.

We very much hope that the commitment expressed to us by representatives of English Heritage both to act with a greater sense of urgency and to keep people informed will prove to be the case.

Dr Paul Graves-Brown MIFA
SMC Archaeological Consultancy

Please add your thoughts on this site

Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend

Newgrange: Archaeology, Art and Legend

Sponsors

More Sites under Threat

See all Sites under Threat →

"What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill?" | Login/Create an Account | 8 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
Now this is getting ridiculous and personal. I can't believe you have the
cheek to call what I have said bolshy given the tone of this and all your
other emails I have seen from you on this subject. Of course I do not
object to better funding for English Heritage, but I really fail to see how
your "protest" can help with this directly. Moreover, in contradiction to
what you say below, you have not said all along that the protest will stick
to the roads. Your email to the list of 3rd May encourages protesters to
hold hands around the base of the Hill. And I suggest that you don't try
and tell people what their job should entail when you clearly don't know
what you are talking about. Enough time has been wasted on these emails in
the last two days. I certainly have better things to do. Good luck with
organising the protest. If it manages to raise extra funding for
Silbury/English Heritage, then I for one will eat my hat!

Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger
Avebury World Heritage Site Management Officer
Kennet District Council
Tel No: +44 (0) 1380 724911 ext. 830
Fax No: +44 (0) 1380 729146
Web Site: www.kennet.gov.uk
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
    >> in contradiction to
    >>what you say below, you have not said all along that the protest will stick
    >>to the roads. Your email to the list of 3rd May encourages protesters to
    >>hold hands around the base of the Hill.

    Try:"No one will climb Silbury
    Hill which, apart from being structurally vulnerable, is a SSSI.
    If foot and mouth restrictions allow we aim to join hands around
    the base of the hill around 2.30pm."

    Not exactly 'encouraging'. If foot and mouth restrictions allow, will
    you be yelling at tourists walking around the Hill? Or just
    protesters? What is it about protesters that makes us more likely
    to spread F&M? Is it just the idea of democratic involvement that
    bothers you? Does your response to public involvement with the
    care of ancient monuments represent EH's?
    You're posting from an EH address.

    >And I suggest that you don't try
    >>and tell people what their job should entail when you clearly don't know
    >>what you are talking about.

    However, I would suggest that you answer just one or two of the
    questions that have been asked on this list, or refer them on
    to people who can, and that you represent EH with a little more thought.

    bw
    Clare Slaney
    [ Reply to This ]

Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
>Exactly right Janet. English Heritage is very conscious that finding the
>right long term solution to the Silbury problems should not be compromised
>by any intermediate measures or knee-jerk reactions to the situation.

Why do individuals choose to feel threatened by a something that is
aimed at getting better funding for EH and NT? *That* is a knee-
jerk reaction, as is the assumption, despite what's written down
very clearly, that we want the Hill filled with gravel and
concrete and compost or whatever's lying about. Protesters are
asking for the Hill to be made an urgent priority, to be
investigated and repaired as quickly as possible, via the better
funding of EH. How on earth can you object to that? Are you
saying, as the Avebury World Heritage Site Management Officer,
that you object to better funding of EH?

>I also agree strongly with Andy Johnson's message emphasising the worries
>about F&M in this part of Wiltshire. Restrictions have only just lifted in
>the Avebury area. There was a suspected case of F&M in the World Heritage
>Site last week, and several confirmed cased in the area in last few weeks.
>Most of the footpaths are still closed. Landowners will be distressed at
>the prospect of a large gathering, even if confined to the highways and
>pavements around Silbury.

All Landowners? Have you done a survey?

Some landowners are distressed at any number of things. If public
movements were dictated by how distressed some landowners feel we'd
never leave home. And let's not get too sanctimonious about F&M
in Wilts, since, although the vast majority of farmers have been
completely above board, sheep movements in some areas have not been
all they should have.

A suspected case of F&M is not a confirmed case.
That's why some restrictions have been lifted.

Whatever, foot and mouth restrictions *are* lifted
from some areas of Avebury which means that, unless
you know more about F&M than MAFF, people can begin
visiting Avebury again. When we arrive on the 19th
we'll keep to the road, as we've said all along. And presumably
people who live in Avebury are going to work and school, risking
bringing in those dire foreign (ie Swindon) diseases.

Melanie, you have the opportunity to share information or get
bolshy about something that you should be supporting.
So far, the mere mention of a protest
against the poor funding of EH has brought forth more information
about the disgraceful situation at Silbury than was available for
a whole year, and certainly more discussion. Any number of
archaeologists were unaware that Silbury even had a hole in it,
and now they know. Presumably that's a good thing, or are we just
supposed to tug our forelocks and be grateful to our Betters?

You serve the WHS, not Local people in a Local area being
Local. You make them sound like something out of The League of
Gentlemen! Local people will be as devastated as anyone else
if Silbury Hill dries up or falls over or crumbles away or
are you suggesting that they don't care? They do, if the
number of local people who are offering us the use of their
homes to meet in and saying they'll join us are anything to
go by.

Silbury Hill and its proper repair, based on what's
needed rather than "I'm Just Doing My Job" procedures, are
what's on the line here. That point seems rather to've slipped.

bw
Clare Slaney
[ Reply to This ]

Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
I find this attitude, which must stem from complete ignorance of what is
going on at Silbury, very misleading and belligerent. There has been a lot
of working going on to solve the problems of Silbury from the first
appearance of the hole in May last year. There is absolutely no
unwillingness to prevent degradation at this important monument and this
assertion is insulting to all involved.

I cannot see that a "protest" will make any difference at all, because as
much as possible is currently being done.

Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger
Avebury World Heritage Site Management Officer
Kennet District Council
Tel No: +44 (0) 1380 724911 ext. 830
Fax No: +44 (0) 1380 729146
Web Site: www.kennet.gov.uk
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
    Can I just point out that according to the National Trust and English
    Heritage websites Silbury Hill is still closed due to Foot and Mouth. This
    could mean that the car park, any footpaths and the land around are closed.
    I don't know what is happening re Silbury, but I would suggest that a
    properly investigated solution is preferable to a panic measure that causes
    more damage in the long run, even if it takes longer to implement initially.
    It certainly sounds as if the problem at Silbury is quite complex and it is
    important that the structure ( ie the location and dimensions of shafts,
    holes, fissures etc) is known before an engineering solution can be found.
    It is not unknown for the conservation measures of the past to cause greater
    damage years later (I'm thinking of the Italian chapel which had its roof
    strengthened with concrete which then caused greater damage years later when
    an earthquake hit). On the whole, Britain has a pretty good record for not
    creating greater...

    Read the rest of this post...
    [ Reply to This ]
      Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
      Exactly right Janet. English Heritage is very conscious that finding the
      right long term solution to the Silbury problems should not be compromised
      by any intermediate measures or knee-jerk reactions to the situation.

      There has clearly been a problem with a lack of public information
      available and English Heritage are trying to remedy this. I have been told
      that details about Silbury will be posted on the EH web site in the next
      few days.

      F&M Restrictions have only just lifted in
      the Avebury area. There was a suspected case of F&M in the World Heritage
      Site last week, and several confirmed cased in the area in last few weeks.
      Most of the footpaths are still closed. Landowners will be distressed at
      the prospect of a large gathering, even if confined to the highways and
      pavements around Silbury.

      Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger
      Avebury World Heritage Site Management Officer
      Kennet District Council
      Tel No: +44 (0) 1380 724911 ext. 830
      Fax No: +44 (0) 1380 729146
      Web Site: www.kennet.gov.uk
      [ Reply to This ]

Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
I must say that the situation regarding silbury hill gives me some concern,
can it be that this hole has been left for nearly a year without any attempt
to consolidate and or stabilise the situation? Its all very well to talk
about paperwork etc. but if the hole has got significantly bigger and
continues to do so some immediate action would seem to be necessary. All too
often, in my experience, there seems an unwillingness to prevent the
degredation of scheduled monuments, even where they are not being damaged as
a result of class consents under the 79 act.

If it takes some sort of protest to get some action from NT and EH then so
be it and as far as I can see the foot and mouth argument is something of a
red herring. If protestors keep to the roads and other areas that are open
to the public, i.e. they abide by the governments advice then there should
be no reason why a protest should not take place. I seem to remember that
there *are* roads to and from avebury. If its...

Read the rest of this post...
[ Reply to This ]
    Re: What *IS* happening to Silbury Hill? by Anonymous on Wednesday, 09 May 2001
    Reply from Peter Ainsworth MP, Shadow Secretary for CMS:

    "...I was very concerned to read of the current state of
    affairs and am writing to Alan Howarth asking to be copied
    in on any response. I have also written to the National
    Trust and will be in touch again in due course."

    Politics has it's place!

    bw
    cs
    [ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.