Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
Another new paper: Altar to Attic to Analysis: Geochemical Authentication of a Rediscovered Victorian Thin Section of Stonehenge's Altar Stone
Anthony J.I. Clarke, Christopher L. Kirkland, Arthur de Oliveira Vicentini, Lisa Brown
Highlights
• A rediscovered Victorian thin section is attributed to Stonehenge’s Altar Stone.
• Zircon-Apatite U–Pb dating authenticates heritage material.
• Pb contamination from antique resin complicates age analysis.
• Time-resolved treatment of ablation signals yields intercept ages.
• Our framework facilitates geochronology on Pb-contaminated samples.
Abstract
Authenticating purported fragments of the Altar Stone, the central six-tonne megalith at Stonehenge, underpins ongoing archaeological investigations and helps preserve valuable material by limiting the need for further destructive sampling. Here, using automated mineralogy and U–Pb zircon–apatite isotopes we examine Victorian thin-section S45 rediscovered in 2021, to evaluate its provenance. Pb-contamination from antique coverslip balsam resin complicates obtaining primary zircon U–Pb ratios. To address this issue, we subset time-resolved zircon isotopic ratio integrations from laser ablation signals and calculate internal grain-level regressions, maximising data recovery. This approach yields twelve zircon dates spanning 389–1850 Ma, while apatite yields components at ca. 1043 and 449 Ma. These ages are consistent with a provenance from northeast Scotland’s Upper Old Red Sandstone Orcadian Basin. Our findings support S45 as an Altar Stone fragment and demonstrate a framework for extracting reliable U–Pb ages from historic thin sections.
www.researchgate.net/publication/401009479_Altar_to_Attic_to_Analysis_Geochemical_Authentication_of_a_Rediscovered_Victorian_Thin_Section_of_Stonehenge%27s_Altar_Stone
doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105619
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road