Temples tend to be renamed complex as there is no proof of their use. In a book of David H. Trump who accepted the the post of Curator of Archaeology at the National Museum of Malta, writes: ‘The 5.2 m high menhir beyond, with a step at its base to prevent any lateral movement, seems to have no logical function, though its builders must have had some reason to justify the extra effort needed to raise it’. Really? Logical reasons in a temple? That can not be figured out with a B.A. and Ph.D.? But must have had a logical reason.
As on the wall of the museum can be read: these ‘temples’ are made of such large blocks that only giants could have built them.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road