Comment Post

Re: Carn Galver by Bladup on Sunday, 19 July 2020

I'm entitled to my opinion as are you, but i'm afraid it's you that appears to be presenting theory as fact, You only really have theories but because you're convinced by them you put them across as facts, You have no real evidence for any of what you say as it's very subjective, this is all i'm pointing out, i can't be against you as i don't know you, But on this subject i for one like to stay within the world of reality, I wouldn't have commented in the first place if you didn't put your theories across as facts and had stated them to be theoretical, Even i find the alignments to Carfury Standing Stone very interesting, the rest is just all a bit silly, You even use the standing stone that Hamish put up on Carn Eanes in an alignment even though it was put up in 1985 and hasn't been proved to be 100% ancient at all, I'm sorry but i think it's important that people also see your theories as subjective and not fact, but i am sorry if that upsets you as that isn't my intention at all.

Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road