Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
Research into the finds shows a history of continuous occupation from 2500 BC until the 16-17th century. The archaeologists found skeletons 1.80 to 2m in height. who could be considered giants in comparison to the usual size of people from these times.
Just a couple of points on this 1.8m is not very tall only 5.9ft so hardly gigantic. 2m 6.5 so reasonably tall but not really a giant. The other slightly confusing thing is when we are talking for the size of these giants as the article clearly states above continuous occupation from 2500bc to 16-17th century. There's no doubt that this is an interesting archaeological site without making outlandish claims.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road