Featured: Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Please Sign the Petition: Amend the Ancient Monuments Act to ban all building on Scheduled Sites

Random Image

A New Dimension to Ancient Measures - from many years of research and fieldwork

A New Dimension to Ancient Measures - from many years of research and fieldwork

Login

Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.

Who's Online

There are currently, 1748 guests and 5 members online.

Sponsors

Comment Post

Re: Applying a modern Spreadsheet to prove the Megalithic Yard by Anonymous on Monday, 19 January 2015

Ok - there is one minimum, and therefore one ''unit''. But an I right in interpreting this result as indicating that, when the circles were laid out using this modulus, the average error in the diameter was 55/60 ft = 11 inches ? This suggests a certain degree of carelessness in using the ''megalithic yard'' measuring rod.



If you were to calculate the actual error in each case, and express it as a percentage of the corresponding diameter, you could then find the average percentage error, and apply the result to the 2.72 figure. This would allow you to put an error bar on that figure - i.e 2.72 +/- X%. This might then have a bearing on the hypothesis that the ''megalithic yard'' is in fact an average man's pace, since you could compare the percentage variation (X) of the ''megalithic yard'' with the variation of paces in a typical population .

Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road