The New Statistical Account of 1845 and the Name Book of 1866 describe this as a Standing Stone while the 1868 OS map shows this as "Supposed Stone Circle (remains of)". If no-one could clearly recall a stone circle back in 1845, surely it seems unlikely that there could be reliable "local knowledge" of circle stones in 2004?
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road