Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
Archaeologist Professor Mike Parker Pearson believes he, by pushing back the dates of construction a few hundred years, has finally solved many of the mysteries surrounding Stonehenge. What remain are the issues of how these neolitics managed shaping the stones without a minimum of suitable tools and transport them to the site. Also we need his ideas on why the setting of the stones obviously resemble a vulva, Could the benes he has analysed be human sacrifice rather than society pings? Since the sociey obviously depended on, and believed in, fertility, violent worshipping of Mother Earth would be completely understandable. And, finally, why is there seemingly a very strong and constant mathematical connection between Stonehenge, the Pyramids in Egypt and Mexico and other megalithic monuments, the construction of which also remains a mystery. Answers, please.
Tue Jensen, Denmark
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road