Not Ur, but a nearby, smaller, site, Tell Sakhariya, four miles from Ur.
Vanished cities abound in Iraq —Babylon, Nineveh and Ur just for starters. War and international sanctions closed these locations off to the world and to scholars. The ruins of ancient Mesopotamia, in modern-day Iraq, have mostly seen visits from looters for the last two decades.
But that may be changing. A U.S. archaeology team that was one of the first to visit Iraq in more than two decades, has just returned from a dig there.
"There is so much gloom and doom in news from Iraq, this is a really hopeful moment," says archaeologist Elizabeth Stone of Stony Brook (N.Y) University. "Iraq, Mesopotamia, is so rich in archaeological sites. It was wonderful to be back."
Stone has been there before, most notably on a helicopter tour of sites looted in the aftermath of the 2003 Iraq War. From the looting tour and satellite photos looking across Iraq, Stone and colleagues determined that robbers dug the equivalent of 3,700 acres of holes in archaeological sites across a region filled with ancient history.
"Things are better now and there was real interest among Iraqi scholars and officials in resuming archaeological work there," Stone says. Instead of a city, they hoped to find an ancient village at a site called Tell Sakhariya, near the southern Iraq city of Nasiriyah, and about four miles from the ancient ruins of Ur.
At the Tell Sakhariya site, the team dug trenches to find the history of the site, which satellite photos had suggested was a small place. "We have lots of cities, but not a lot of villages," Stone says. "And not a lot of time, so we needed to start small."
For her National Geographic Society-funded team, "small" was a square football-field sized mound, or tell, the giveaway for an ancient settlement site built of crumbled brick and pottery. Instead of a village, though, the digging at first revealed an encampment for herders who flourished in the region after 1800 B.C., when a dynasty of kings fell with nearby Ur. Cow and fish bones were found in hearths there, left just like marsh herders today leave them in the region.
Satellite images suggested a "fortress" remained even lower down, based on what looked like the outline of walls. The archaeologists dug five test pits across what they thought were walls and kitchens. But it turned out the "fortress" walls were just salt-soaked depressions, fooling the researchers.
"Instead we found burials," of what seem like infants, Stone says, and the clay edges of a platform more than 80 yards across.
What else did they find? Among the discoveries were parts of inscriptions on 10 clay bricks and markers found at the platform level. They suggest a ceremonial platform built by the kings of Ur around 2000 B.C. At the time, Ur was one of the largest cities of the world, with tens of thousands of citizens, great record-keepers of ancient days who marked cuneiform symbols in mud bricks to record their business dealings. Which is why we know so much about them, now.
"It's very tentative, but the site may be Ga'esh, a place where Ur's kings went every year for a festival renewing their rulership," Stone says. The claim has competition from an Italian team now investigating another nearby site in the region, she adds.
"These people kept private records, still in their houses," she says. "And you look under the floors, and there are burials. It is the complete package for archaeology." After waiting 20 years to return, Stone says, "We're very hopeful we can return again."
Thanks to coldrum : For more, read at http://www.usatoday.com.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road