Wow, Some stretch of the imagination, because of a few Japer tools and some unidentified "artifacts" to give it a date of "12,000 years before the present", Making claims like this is why so many "Orthodox Archaeologists" steer clear of assumptions, and why verifiable sites of extremely ancient dates are so excruciatingly re-examined. Just think how much debris would be on top of such an ancient site, especially in a forest setting, Common sense would dictate extreme peer review, before making any more claims of this site.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road