Lol either Importand People are trying to hide such evidence to prevent more "Hitlers" from popping up to re-create their own super-civilisation, or such a thing just goes beyond their belief. It cannot possibly be Atlantis - wrong place, for a start, and it was constructed in a manner that didn't necessarily fit the Arlantean ultra-culture, as far as Edgar Cayce is concerned.
There's also evidence of a river-bed that flows through the structures.
It's probably either Lemuria (sank a few thousand years before Atlantis), or an extension of the Mesoamerican regions that sank long ago, or was flooded.
I suspect that it may very well be a man-made formation, as nature does NOT write on strangely symetrical structures in Heiroglyphs and Runes... But, before I set my mind to anywhere too drastic, I'm going to just wait for all the experts and proffessionals to stop whinging at something that may go against their previous evidence, and to go get us common folk some ANSWERS! Also, Paulina (apparently) was arrested and detained in Mexico for fraud, when she didn't really do anything to upset such laws. She was released before a year went by and said she was glad that she got out alive and was able to tell the tale.
BTW:
I know finances for these things are tough to get a hold of, BUT: That Japanese underwater monolith is under very close investigation; so is - or was - the ancient ruins of that ancient mythical Indian underwater city.
Also, I'm tired of people who think they know better and whom also cover up evidence of anything that goes outside of their little square. I'm sick of of hearing biased little nobodys or scientists that complain about something that may prove them wrong. I'm tired of hearing about things on this earth that are completely ignored JUST because some ship of fools who call themselves experts are completely debunking any 'outside' ideas just because they don't like it/them - one has to consider all options and theories first in order to establish a better understanding of what it is one is investigating or attempting to understand.
However, scientists, experts, proffessionals, archaeologists, paeliontologists (spelling?), and anything-else-ologists are about as shallow-minded and packed to the rafters in beliefs and their own little world as andy devout Catholic (no offence). No doubt it's because they (experts) think they know everything just because they read a book in a room in front of some random in a tweed jacket. Their job is to give us answers to the world's mysteries, and many do, but all who are associated with this Cuban structure appear to consider it nothing more than a weird-looking rock. Yes, what a great answer. A rock that's the perfect shape of a bent pyramid, a set of rocks piled on top of one-another to form a religious-looking structure (hence it's resemblance to symbols in Yucatan), and many other bits and bobs are just 'natural formations'? There's little doubt, too, that it would also be denied by the church, considering the option if it pre-dated Adam and Eve. We may have the answer to the end of Scientist/Religion conflict under that Cuban water.
P.S.
I really think somebody should write a book on that mystery:
"Why is Atlantis the Least Discussed Topic or Option Amongst Scientists?" It's starting to piss me off to the point where I had to rant. HERE, of all places!
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road