Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
Leaving aside the multifarious elements adopted from Paganism(s) into Christianity as it evolved (Deities transformed into Saints, Seasonal celebrations Christianised, the concept of the Trinity introduced by a Celtic [Druid?] theologian, etc), I would dispute that we can really state that the 'sheela-na-gig' images are 'Pagan'.
My current understanding is that no-one has any idea what these images were originally intended to mean, and that the name itself originated relatively recently from one old Irishman with no meaning explained or subsequently discovered - it might well have been his smutty joke! That the carvings were made, not necessarily conspicuously but certainly not secretly either, in the fabric of a number of Christian churches, and allowed to remain, suggests that their presence and connotations might have been acceptable to the Church authorities of the time.
To assume that, because these images have some unexplained sexual meaning, they are 'Pagan' is merely to accept the unhealthy fear of sexual matters that a proportion of Christians regrettably exhibit. Given sex's fundamental importance to all (multi-celled) life, however, this fear ought not to be pandered to and thus encouraged to further harm human society.
If anyone has further light to shed on the nature of the 'sheela-na-gigs', I would of course welcome enlightenment!
P. Terry Hunt [non-aligned Pagan]
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road