There is also the matter of the original expedition bringing up samples of hard granite that the structures were made from, which is nothing whatsoever similar to cement or modern buiding materials. They had commented that this white granite was not local, that it would have needed to come from Mexico.
The sonar scans were extremely detailed, and the buildings were described as quite huge. You can clearly see what appears to be steps at an entrance, and architectural details that really could only be found in a city design. It is very hard to imagine these things as anything but buildings.
About the only question I have about it is it's age. How the hell did it all get so deep, but remain basically intact? That's a huge mystery.
I'm not surprised no one will fund a real enterpirse to give it an honest look. Scientists are appalled at the idea that modern archeology might have man's timeline all wrong. The only people who are interested in the truth about the matter are those who havent invested their lives and beliefs in the safe old stodgy traditions and histories of civilization going from point A to B to C in a safe, neat, organized, written down way.
If this should turn out to be some 40,000 year old, relatively advanced civilization; everything we think we know about man in the hazy past would collapse in a heap of refuse. Scientists would look like idiots, textbooks would need rewritten.
Cant have that, so, scientists are frightened to death to really look.
Only the truly brilliant, young geniuses...like Einstein, dared to look outside the traditional views, and really consider possibilities that dare to step outside what is assumed to be the scientific truth.
This underwater discovery is much too deep for anyone who isnt bold, young, and willing to look past the curtain of conventions and assumptions.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road