From The Mailonline website:
Revealed: The 5,000-year-old, 20ft-high fence which hid Stonehenge from its nosy Stone Age neighbours
By Alun Rees
Last updated at 10:19 PM on 30th August 2008
Tourists who complain about the fence put up around Stonehenge in the Seventies should spare a thought for their Neolithic ancestors... they couldn’t even see the site because of a huge wooden barrier.
Archaeologists have found traces of the 20ft-high timber fence that snaked almost two miles across Salisbury Plain and hid sacred ceremonies from unworthy locals more than 5,000 years ago.
Now trenches have been dug along the line researchers believe the palisade took as it stretched from the east of the ancient stone circle, past the Heel Stone, to the west before heading south.
Exposed: Stonehenge was once shielded from sight by a two-mile-long fence which kept the site private from nosy neighbours
And experts believe that the time and energy taken to construct such a barrier, which has no other practical or defensive use, meant that it was designed to hide religious ceremonies from prying eyes.
Dr Josh Pollard, of Bristol University, who is co-director of the dig, said: ‘The construction must have taken a lot of manpower.
‘The palisade is an open structure which would not have been defensive and was too high to be practical for controlling livestock.
‘It certainly wasn’t for hunting herded animals and so, like everything else in this ceremonial landscape, we have to believe it must have had a religious significance.
‘The most plausible explanation is that it was built at huge cost to the community to screen the environs of Stonehenge from view. Basically, we think it was to keep the lower classes from seeing what exactly their rulers and the priestly class were doing.
‘Perhaps we should call Michael Eavis in from the Glastonbury Festival as a consultant because the huge metal fence erected there every year is the nearest modern equivalent.’
Enlarge Holy site: One theory suggests the barrier kept the 'lower classes' from seeing activities of the priestly class
Mike Pitts, editor of British Archaeology Magazine and author of the book Hengeworld, said: ‘This is a fantastic insight into what the landscape would have looked like. This huge wooden palisade would have snaked across the landscape, blotting out views to Stonehenge from one side. The other side was the ceremonial route to the Henge from the River Avon and would have been shielded by the contours.
‘The palisade would have heightened the mystery of whatever ceremonies were performed and it would have endowed those who were privy to those secrets with more power and prestige. In modern terms, you had to be invited or have a ticket to get in.
‘We hope to learn more about the structure, which we lose track of on the other side of the main A303 trunk road because any remains were obliterated by the construction of a wartime airfield.’
Meanwhile, another team of scientists led by Professor Mike Parker Pearson of Sheffield University is working on a collection of partly cremated bones found at Stonehenge in the Thirties by amateur archaeologists.
Midsummer worship: Thousands still gather to see sunrise over Stonehenge on the Summer Solstice
The task has been made very difficult because the remains have been put in two sacks and reburied in one spot.
Mr Pitts said: ‘They were the remains of 50 burials at Stonehenge which were reburied in one hole in a complete mix-up. We think they were the bones of 50 kings and queens and may represent burials over a period of 1,000 years. Professor Parker Pearson has speculated that we may be looking at a dynasty at Stonehenge.
‘Retrieving and sorting this out will make a jigsaw look simple. It represents the most important conundrum in British archaeology for a century. It’s very exciting.’
(See also the Riverside Project website of Sheffield University/ Prof.Mike Parker Pearson.)
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road