Register here - as a registered user you get more features and fewer ads.
Should I or should I not comment on the article, for I am unable to think along such lines. While vigorously upholding the right of everyone to hold their own point of view, I would like to point out that the inverted 'V' mentioned was actually carved there as a means of explanation for the benefit of the builders, refering,as it did, to the superstructure that was never built. Careful examination of all the stones has revealed other such diagrams. Those design diagrams are the only truly ancient carvings assiciated with the actual erection of the great stones that I have found. Whilst on the subject of the Stonehenge carvings, of which there are many, the much vaunted daggers and axe heads, most visible at the foot of the inner face of stone 53, although introduced by the hand of man during the building process, arrived there, just as they did on other stones, quite by chance, so should not be called carvings.
Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road