<< Text Pages >> Charkhab Palace - Ancient Palace in Iran
Submitted by coldrum on Saturday, 12 September 2009 Page Views: 8580
Site WatchSite Name: Charkhab Palace Alternative Name: Palace of Cyrus the GreatCountry: Iran
NOTE: This site is 24.31 km away from the location you searched for.
Type: Ancient Palace
Nearest Town: Borazjan Nearest Village: Charkhab
Latitude: 34.400000N Longitude: 47.666700E
Condition:
5 | Perfect |
4 | Almost Perfect |
3 | Reasonable but with some damage |
2 | Ruined but still recognisable as an ancient site |
1 | Pretty much destroyed, possibly visible as crop marks |
0 | No data. |
-1 | Completely destroyed |
5 | Superb |
4 | Good |
3 | Ordinary |
2 | Not Good |
1 | Awful |
0 | No data. |
5 | Can be driven to, probably with disabled access |
4 | Short walk on a footpath |
3 | Requiring a bit more of a walk |
2 | A long walk |
1 | In the middle of nowhere, a nightmare to find |
0 | No data. |
5 | co-ordinates taken by GPS or official recorded co-ordinates |
4 | co-ordinates scaled from a detailed map |
3 | co-ordinates scaled from a bad map |
2 | co-ordinates of the nearest village |
1 | co-ordinates of the nearest town |
0 | no data |
Be the first person to rate this site - see the 'Contribute!' box in the right hand menu.
Internal Links:
External Links:
Ancient Palace in Iran. The Worrisome Status of Achaemenid Sites in Bushehr. In a recent report by the Persian service of CHN published on Tuesday, the southern Iranian province of Bushehr is named alongside Khuzestan and Esfahan and number of other provinces by the Iranian archaeologists as an endangered province when comes to the heritage sites.
While government controlled Iran’s Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organisation (ICHTO) portrays and claims the Iranian heritage sites in Bushehr are protected and taken care of, the evidence tells a completely different story.
On August 3rd, a news regarding the dreadful status of Achaemenid palaces of Bardak Siyah (bardak siyā) and Charkhab (čarxāb) in Bushehr was published, which ICHTO immediately responded with a statement, rejecting the news and claims that the ancient sites are well protected and in good condition.
Iranian archaeologist and Achaemenid expert Mohammad-Taqi Ataee believes the issued statement is general and just refers to some historical evidence and previous archaeological expeditions in the province, without mentioning the issues that Iranian archaeologists are concerned about.
The statement includes some past promises that never materialised, restorations that no Iranian archaeologists are aware of it, and some general history about the previous archaeological expeditions in the area that took place before and after 1979 change of regime in Iran.
The statements regarding Bardak Siyah Palace claims that ICHTO has covered the whole site with a protection roof, which in reality some scaffolding has been erected the only thing this has done is to spoil the historical landscape (Fig.1.)
The archaeological activities section in the report refers to six seasons in Charkhab Palace (before and after 1979); two in Bardak Siyah Palace (one season in 1977 and an unfinished season in 2004); one season in Mohamad-Ābād, and one in Sang-e Siyah Palace (before 1979); and one in the Shahid Band-Ārezū Mound (after 1979).
Although all the archaeological activities prior to 1979 were compiled and are ready for publication, but nothing has been done yet. The Provincial Branch of ICHTO blames this on the lack of funding, while other provinces such as Lorestan, Mazandaran, Northern Khorasan and Kohkiloyeh with the same or even less funding have each conducted tens of successful archaeological research and have managed to publish their finds.
The only truth in this statement is the entry about the purchase of seven-thousand square meters of land surrounding the Bardak Siyah Palace, to prevent any agricultural activities near the palace.
However, the most devastating of all pre-Islamic sites in Bushsher is Sang-e Siyah Palace, which fails to mention its current condition in the report.
Sang-e Siyah Palace (sang-e siyāh – black stone) is located near the township of Dashtestan, sixty kilometres northeast of the Persian Gulf’s Port of Bushehr and one hundred and ten kilometres southwest of the city of Kazerun. The Palace is denoted to the Cyrus I, the grandson of king Achaemenes, the founder of the House of Achaemenid (later dynastic empire) and son of Teispes of Anshan. His grandson Cyrus the Great known as the “Father of the Iranian Nation” since he united and gathered all the Iranian peoples under a political and cultural umbrella in 550 BCE.
The first and only archaeological research on the site was conducted by archaeologist Dr Sirus Baqerzadeh in the winter of 1977 (Fig.2 and 3). The palace was restored; the recovered artefacts back then were transferred to the Iran’s Archaeological Research Centre and the results of the expedition were gathered in a book which was due to be published before the rise of Islamic Republic to power.
The said book was kept at the provincial ICHTO which mysteriously disappeared and to this day no one knows its whereabouts.
In mid 1980, The Taliban like destruction of giant Buddhas in Afghanistan, a number of post-revolutionary Islamic influential figures from Tehran and Bushehr with the assistance of another figure from the city of Borazjan known as Gholamreza A. have attended at the site of Achaemenid palace of Sang-e Siyah and bulldozed it down, and have dug over a meter into the foundation.
Today from the magnificent palace which was similar to Pasargadae, only a pile of rubble and broken stones remain (Fig. 4 and 5).
Although, due to the extensive destruction of the site, its restoration seems impossible, the ICHTO however has not taken any steps to protect what is left of the palace’s stones from being taken away by locals to be reused as building material.
Source: Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies
You may be viewing yesterday's version of this page. To see the most up to date information please register for a free account.
Do not use the above information on other web sites or publications without permission of the contributor.
Click here to see more info for this site
Nearby sites
Click here to view sites on an interactive map of the areaKey: Red: member's photo, Blue: 3rd party photo, Yellow: other image, Green: no photo - please go there and take one, Grey: site destroyed
Download sites to:
KML (Google Earth)
GPX (GPS waypoints)
CSV (Garmin/Navman)
CSV (Excel)
To unlock full downloads you need to sign up as a Contributory Member. Otherwise downloads are limited to 50 sites.
Turn off the page maps and other distractions
Nearby sites listing. In the following links * = Image available
10.4km NNE 15° Sahneh Rock Cut Tombs* Rock Cut Tomb
21.2km W 267° Bisitun* Ancient Village or Settlement
29.1km ENE 67° Anahita Temple* Ancient Temple
39.1km ENE 70° Godin Tepe* Ancient Village or Settlement
48.8km SSE 150° Bābā Jān Tepe* Ancient Village or Settlement
49.1km W 269° Taq-e Bostan Reliefs* Carving
81.3km ENE 60° Ganjnameh* Carving
88.9km ENE 60° Avicenna Mausoleum and Museum* Museum
90.0km ENE 60° Ecbatana Ancient Village or Settlement
100.4km NW 317° Rabat Tepe Ancient Village or Settlement
120.0km SSE 148° Falak-ol-Aflak Fortress* Museum
248.7km WSW 257° Eshnunna Ancient Village or Settlement
251.4km SSE 167° Susa (Iran)* Ancient Palace
255.5km SSE 161° Chogha Mish* Ancient Village or Settlement
265.2km SSE 166° Haft Tepe* Ancient Temple
271.4km NNE 13° Chehr-Abad Salt Mine Ancient Mine, Quarry or other Industry
277.5km SSE 163° Chogha Zanbil* Ancient Temple
315.0km SSW 211° Adab* Ancient Village or Settlement
316.0km WNW 302° Satu Qala (Idu)* Ancient Village or Settlement
322.5km WSW 249° Iraqi National Museum in Baghdad Museum
327.4km WNW 289° Nuzi Ancient Village or Settlement
333.9km ENE 64° Arastu Tepe Ancient Village or Settlement
334.1km WSW 237° Kutha Ancient Village or Settlement
339.0km SW 224° Nippur* Ancient Village or Settlement
340.7km SSW 210° Zabalam Ancient Village or Settlement
View more nearby sites and additional images