The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Gołczewo round barrow

Featured Title:
Cave Of Forgotten Dreams on DVD
Cave Of Forgotten Dreams on DVD

London's Ley Lines, Pathways of enlightenment
London's Ley Lines, Pathways of enlightenment

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 87 guests and 1 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> IMHO
New   Reply
Page 3 of 5 ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 )
Author IMHO
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2646
OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 15:06   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 17:00   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 15:06, tiompan wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George



IMHO, it is a waste of time and effort.
Your a believer, thus anything that threatens that belief has to be attacked.
cropredy





 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2646
OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 17:27   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:00, cropredy wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 15:06, tiompan wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George



IMHO, it is a waste of time and effort.
Your a believer, thus anything that threatens that belief has to be attacked.
cropredy




Lol .
As was explained in the previous post the point about "facts " are , that if someone gets something wrong it can be refuted . The Wiki pointed out the problems with "torsion fields " if there is anything wrong in the article then for the sake of a better understanding of the subject it is best to point that out , if you can . That way we all advance in our understanding .
Rather than simply posting opinions without support or links to dodgy websites , here was an opportunity for once for you to actually clarify something , but you have declined on spurious name calling grounds . That is the behaviour of "true believers " and a desertion of the spirit of a forum .






 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 17:37   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:27, tiompan wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:00, cropredy wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 15:06, tiompan wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George



IMHO, it is a waste of time and effort.
Your a believer, thus anything that threatens that belief has to be attacked.
cropredy




Lol .
As was explained in the previous post the point about "facts " are , that if someone gets something wrong it can be refuted . The Wiki pointed out the problems with "torsion fields " if there is anything wrong in the article then for the sake of a better understanding of the subject it is best to point that out , if you can . That way we all advance in our understanding .
Rather than simply posting opinions without support or links to dodgy websites , here was an opportunity for once for you to actually clarify something , but you have declined on spurious name calling grounds . That is the behaviour of "true believers " and a desertion of the spirit of a forum .


[/quote]

I could have gone into detail about the faults with You leaky link, but whats the point, Your a zealot.
No mention of shaman and how they interact with time, becuse the writers of the leaky article are co-zealots.
wheres kosyrev??
Those leaky links are all well and good, but they are totally OPINIATED.
Presented as FACTS , but actually opinion.
It is headed in brackets PSEUDOSCIENCE for gawds sake.
The real pseudoscience is einstein garbage, now there was a plonker.
cropredy




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2646
OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 17:55   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:37, cropredy wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:27, tiompan wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:00, cropredy wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 15:06, tiompan wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George



IMHO, it is a waste of time and effort.
Your a believer, thus anything that threatens that belief has to be attacked.
cropredy




Lol .
As was explained in the previous post the point about "facts " are , that if someone gets something wrong it can be refuted . The Wiki pointed out the problems with "torsion fields " if there is anything wrong in the article then for the sake of a better understanding of the subject it is best to point that out , if you can . That way we all advance in our understanding .
Rather than simply posting opinions without support or links to dodgy websites , here was an opportunity for once for you to actually clarify something , but you have declined on spurious name calling grounds . That is the behaviour of "true believers " and a desertion of the spirit of a forum .


[/quote]

I could have gone into detail about the faults with You leaky link, but whats the point, Your a zealot.
No mention of shaman and how they interact with time, becuse the writers of the leaky article are co-zealots.
wheres kosyrev??
Those leaky links are all well and good, but they are totally OPINIATED.
Presented as FACTS , but actually opinion.
It is headed in brackets PSEUDOSCIENCE for gawds sake.
The real pseudoscience is einstein garbage, now there was a plonker.
cropredy
[/quote]

Yet another fact free , opinionated waste of space .
The reason for the pseudoscience heading is because that is a fitting description of the content .

No you couldn't have gone into detail .




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 18:34   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:55, tiompan wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:37, cropredy wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 17:27, tiompan wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 17:00, cropredy wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 15:06, tiompan wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-28 13:51, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,
Wikipedia is a perfect post to put into this thread.
It is opinion written, it is not any sort of factual content.





That's the point about facts , if there is anything that is in the Wiki that is wrong then all you have to do is prove it and our knowledge will advance . I look forward to any kind of argument that you might proffer to show the errors in the article .
George



IMHO, it is a waste of time and effort.
Your a believer, thus anything that threatens that belief has to be attacked.
cropredy




Lol .
As was explained in the previous post the point about "facts " are , that if someone gets something wrong it can be refuted . The Wiki pointed out the problems with "torsion fields " if there is anything wrong in the article then for the sake of a better understanding of the subject it is best to point that out , if you can . That way we all advance in our understanding .
Rather than simply posting opinions without support or links to dodgy websites , here was an opportunity for once for you to actually clarify something , but you have declined on spurious name calling grounds . That is the behaviour of "true believers " and a desertion of the spirit of a forum .


[/quote]

I could have gone into detail about the faults with You leaky link, but whats the point, Your a zealot.
No mention of shaman and how they interact with time, becuse the writers of the leaky article are co-zealots.
wheres kosyrev??
Those leaky links are all well and good, but they are totally OPINIATED.
Presented as FACTS , but actually opinion.
It is headed in brackets PSEUDOSCIENCE for gawds sake.
The real pseudoscience is einstein garbage, now there was a plonker.
cropredy
[/quote]

Yet another fact free , opinionated waste of space .
The reason for the pseudoscience heading is because that is a fitting description of the content .

No you couldn't have gone into detail .
[/quote]

IMHO,
This is where the game of tennis was invented.
ping pong.
cropredy




 Profile   Reply
rogeralbin



Joined:
08-10-2010


Messages: 189
OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 19:11   


Quote:

On 2013-01-28 09:58, Runemage wrote:
The M.Krinker patented device can supposedly record SEV 's if that is the case and he is also correct that what dowsers detect is also SEV 's then we have some means of testing to see if there is at least a correlation between the the findings of the device and dowsing .

So where are they available from, how much are they and how are they used?

Rune



There is I think an e mail near the top and a link to the US patent office at the very bottom.
There are various gaussmeters, Teslameters, ELF, RF etc simply by googling.
I have mucked about with a Teslameter mobile fone app in the past.




 Profile   Reply
Andy B



Joined:
13-02-2001


Messages: 7001
from Surrey, UK

OFF-Line

 Posted 28-01-2013 at 20:29   
Just as a general point could you all try not to 're quote' too many times. More than 3 nested quotes and things don't display properly. Plus it makes for loads of repeated material to wade through. Could you all try and edit the quotes down a bit.

Just plain Reply (without quote) can be your friend as well!




 Profile  Email   Reply
rogeralbin



Joined:
08-10-2010


Messages: 189
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 03:09   
Ah, all is quiet on the threads of the web of wierd now the full moon is past and the entrainment frequencies ebb away, conjecture, anecdotal, insight? Whom who's opinion is not subjective will answer for the sceptics?




 Profile   Reply
rogeralbin



Joined:
08-10-2010


Messages: 189
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 09:00   
The belief that the full moon effects people making them behave more outrageously/oddly is centuaries old and hotly debated. Various surveys support one side of the arguement or the other, each opposing view siezing the supporting survey with almost religious zeal.
It is really a classic dowser/sceptic arguement, obvious to one side but not the other but it does appear to sit rather well with the brainwave entrainment theory (I suppose that was enchantment in the past).





 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2646
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 09:18   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 09:00, rogeralbin wrote:
The belief that the full moon effects people making them behave more outrageously/oddly is centuaries old and hotly debated. Various surveys support one side of the arguement or the other, each opposing view siezing the supporting survey with almost religious zeal.
It is really a classic dowser/sceptic arguement, obvious to one side but not the other but it does appear to sit rather well with the brainwave entrainment theory (I suppose that was enchantment in the past).




There is some data that can be checked in relation to the full moon idea . It doesn't look like that the emergency services police /hospitals note any change .

George




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 11:40   
IMHO,
And as I detect,
It is when the moon is side on that it has the most effect.
When the moon is full or new it is merely causing a slight alteration in the two fields of the sun and Earth .
When it is side on it makes the most difference.

It was the moon that gave Me the most clues as it has 13(26) such events each year, whereas the equinox and solstices are less frequent.
I noted how when the moon was at quadreture that the flows I detect varied most, they actually stop and often reverse as the moon sits side on, I liken it to a shadow moving along.

This is when the vortex points of implosion and emmitance reverse.
Those vortex points are sited in the chambers of long barrows, and what I am certain of is that the human remains were placed exactly upon that vortical point, and when a reversal occured is when they considered that the soul as such came back out of the location where it had sank into whilst stood for two weeks on that point.
At that moment is when the quartz plug blocking off the enterance hole was removed( and it may well have glowed at this moment as the magnetic flows cause a stress on the quartz)

If an already impregnated female was then located in direct line of this I consider they considered that the deceased soul jumped into the new forming vehicle( body)

Reincarnation .

cropredy




 Profile   Reply
karloff



Joined:
20-10-2006


Messages: 604
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 12:46   


Quote:

On 2013-01-27 19:44, cropredy wrote:
Have just watched this,
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/time-team/4od#3469998

A set of brainwashed murderers digging up bodies.
Nowhere was there any attempt at working out WHY chalk, why was the mound origonally made of chalk.
No all they could do was concentrate upon concrete EVIDENCE of bodies.
Typical garbage of trying to FIT current thinking onto a former knowledge.
They set off with saying it was a mound of EARTH....garbage.
They hardly put any effort into the geometry, the dimensions of 5the mound, all effort was directed towards EVIDENCE, findable artifacts to FIT their ASSUMPTION based crap.

I hope I have conveyed My utter contempt at these buffoons destroying the very fabric and reason for the mound????
cropredy



Hi All
Its so nice to see non-judgemental, open minded liberal views expressed without any shouting or offensive language.




 Profile   Reply
rogeralbin



Joined:
08-10-2010


Messages: 189
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 12:49   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 11:40, cropredy wrote:
IMHO,
And as I detect,
It is when the moon is side on that it has the most effect.
When the moon is full or new it is merely causing a slight alteration in the two fields of the sun and Earth .
When it is side on it makes the most difference.

It was the moon that gave Me the most clues as it has 13(26) such events each year, whereas the equinox and solstices are less frequent.
I noted how when the moon was at quadreture that the flows I detect varied most, they actually stop and often reverse as the moon sits side on, I liken it to a shadow moving along.

This is when the vortex points of implosion and emmitance reverse.
Those vortex points are sited in the chambers of long barrows, and what I am certain of is that the human remains were placed exactly upon that vortical point, and when a reversal occured is when they considered that the soul as such came back out of the location where it had sank into whilst stood for two weeks on that point.
At that moment is when the quartz plug blocking off the enterance hole was removed( and it may well have glowed at this moment as the magnetic flows cause a stress on the quartz)

If an already impregnated female was then located in direct line of this I consider they considered that the deceased soul jumped into the new forming vehicle( body)

Reincarnation .

cropredy



Kev.
In your opinion if there is a passage mound constructed to allow the Sun half an hour after dawn to shine directly through the entrance down the shaft and project a pin hole camera image of itself (the Sun) onto the rear wall on a given day (equinox for example).
At the same time on the same bearing as the Sun a mile or so to the east of the passage mound are a group/circle of standing stones.
All three passage mound/Sun and standing stones in line at a fixed moment in time what is the purpose?
Rog




 Profile   Reply
rogeralbin



Joined:
08-10-2010


Messages: 189
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 13:03   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 09:18, tiompan wrote




There is some data that can be checked in relation to the full moon idea . It doesn't look like that the emergency services police /hospitals note any change .

George
[/quote]

From time to time differing results are published in the media, however a substantial number of Doormen/A&E nurses/Police/Taxi drivers/Bar staff etc particularly those employed late night would support the Moon effect.
Rog




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 13:15   
Karloff,
I held back in what I thought of that awfull program.
I am surprised there is anything left on salisbury plain after all the tank activitey on there by our heroic soldiers blowing up all of the archaeology.
It was My opinion, You no doubt have Your opinion, nowhere was there any offensive language used, unless brainwashed murderers , my description of what soldiers are is considered by you so?
You are most welcome to Your opinion, have a nice day.
cropredy




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 13:21   
Rogeralbin,

I totally doubt any mound was aligned with any visual intent at all.
The possible and probable reasoning of the stone circle relationship to the barrow is where the circle is a device to upgrade the flow into the barrow.
We witness the end construction of what will have been a continuous altering construction, imho.
cropredy




 Profile   Reply
karloff



Joined:
20-10-2006


Messages: 604
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 13:59   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 13:15, cropredy wrote:
Karloff,
I held back in what I thought of that awfull program.
I am surprised there is anything left on salisbury plain after all the tank activitey on there by our heroic soldiers blowing up all of the archaeology.
It was My opinion, You no doubt have Your opinion, nowhere was there any offensive language used, unless brainwashed murderers , my description of what soldiers are is considered by you so?
You are most welcome to Your opinion, have a nice day.
cropredy



Hi
And of course your sterling work in protecting, promoting and preserving our heritage is widely acknowledged as is your willingness to accept diverse opinions your love of literature and your calm and collected posts.


[ This message was edited by: karloff on 2013-01-29 14:04 ]




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2646
OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 14:22   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 13:03, rogeralbin wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 09:18, tiompan wrote




There is some data that can be checked in relation to the full moon idea . It doesn't look like that the emergency services police /hospitals note any change .

George



From time to time differing results are published in the media, however a substantial number of Doormen/A&E nurses/Police/Taxi drivers/Bar staff etc particularly those employed late night would support the Moon effect.
Rog
[/quote]
It's a classic response of anyone who works with the pesky "public " but it is not supported by the data we do have .

George





 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 29-01-2013 at 16:34   


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 13:59, karloff wrote:


Quote:

On 2013-01-29 13:15, cropredy wrote:
Karloff,
I held back in what I thought of that awfull program.
I am surprised there is anything left on salisbury plain after all the tank activitey on there by our heroic soldiers blowing up all of the archaeology.
It was My opinion, You no doubt have Your opinion, nowhere was there any offensive language used, unless brainwashed murderers , my description of what soldiers are is considered by you so?
You are most welcome to Your opinion, have a nice day.
cropredy



Hi
And of course your sterling work in protecting, promoting and preserving our heritage is widely acknowledged as is your willingness to accept diverse opinions your love of literature and your calm and collected posts.


[ This message was edited by: karloff on 2013-01-29 14:04 ]



If instead of been combatative at every opportunity, You actually listened to what I am with great difficulty trying to convey, then the future of the megaliths would be assured, instead of been bulldozed and destroyed constantly.
But Your super EGO is too powerfull to ever let such occur.
cropredy




 Profile   Reply
Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
New   Reply
Jump To
 
Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.