Featured Title:
Pictures from the Past: Art and Symbols of the Neolithic and Bronze Age |
 |
| Circles of Stone - Max Milligan |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 113 guests and 3 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
Stones Forum >> The benefit of knowledge?
|
 |
| Author |
The benefit of knowledge? |
jonm
Joined:
12-07-2011
Messages: 816
from UK
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 30-01-2013 at 18:02
Quote:
| Intriguing; what would you do if your wacky Stonehenge "thought experiment" was actually viable; i.e. someone could present evidence of a universal rationale for the building of antiquities megalithic monuments? |
|
Perhaps. What if there was an indication of a universal rationale: Is there any additional argument for urgency of discovery? (other than the arguments bat400 has put forward)
Personally, I doubt Stonehenge would present evidence of a universal rationale, though a universal rationale would need to explain why such a curious one-off was built?
edited: quotes got messed up
[ This message was edited by: jonm on 2013-01-30 18:03 ]
 Profile
 Reply
|
Elijah
Joined:
21-03-2012
Messages: 86
from Spain
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-01-2013 at 11:40
Hi Jon
Quote:
| What if there was an indication of a universal rationale |
|
There is actually plenty of evidence to suggest just that, unfortunately, the Church, and historians, have placed this evidence off-limits to serious scientific research!
Quote:
| Personally, I doubt Stonehenge would present evidence of a universal rationale, though a universal rationale would need to explain why such a curious one-off was built? |
|
The only thing that makes Stonehenge different from any other ancient megalithic circle is the sophisticated design of its stones; something indicative of a larger than normal population in that area, with powerful spiritual leaders who were able to focus their efforts and ideas.
Quote:
| Is there any additional argument for urgency of discovery? (other than the arguments bat400 has put forward) |
|
Yes, the evidence I allude to above holds out the promise of both physical and biological discoveries.
John
Profile
Reply
|
jonm
Joined:
12-07-2011
Messages: 816
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-01-2013 at 18:10
Quote:
| Two blokes with ice-cream cones on their head, topped with a strawberry, are contributing and I keep mixing them up. |
|
Ice cream cone gone (thanks Andy)
Profile
Reply
|
jonm
Joined:
12-07-2011
Messages: 816
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 01-02-2013 at 19:15
Quote:
| Yes, the evidence I allude to above holds out the promise of both physical and biological discoveries. |
|
Sounds like a new topic for the Megalithic Mysteries section? I have had a flood of new work in, bit of a mystery in itself: Sorry for not responding earlier.
Profile
Reply
|
JohnLindsay
Joined:
28-02-2012
Messages: 116
from London
OFF-Line
| Posted 10-02-2013 at 21:08
In Library Thing you can refer to earlier quotes by >number which I find useful, to have to requote means that quote lists become really long... so if I want to return to earlier areas, and then expect people to track back to find the context of that discussion, is to expect people to make more effort than is reasonable, but hi, we are in this world.
The original opening gambit, and an early response got me then to the garden of the tree of knowledge, and the benefit of eating the fruit.
Lest I leave this short of content, recently in a menu I found sheep ricotta gnudi...
Profile
Reply
|
JohnLindsay
Joined:
28-02-2012
Messages: 116
from London
OFF-Line
| Posted 10-02-2013 at 21:15
I've missed something, where has the ice cream cone gone?
But the general, rather than universal, matter of stone cones raises the benefit of knowledge thread in an interesting way, for there seems to be evidence that at particular times, the form, time or temporality, ( I do have to check I don't make typoes in these places) similar things happened in different spaces, or places, and that is worth reasoning over...
Given that all sorts of reasoning appear to be regarded as reasonable, "god created the world in six days"; "in the beginning god created heaven and earth" it seems worth considering what is then specific to a particular space region area, with assigned property, causewayed enclosure, cursus, henge, or stone circles or standing stones, or whatever, and collecting the evidence to those enclosures and those spaces. Then collecting the arguments, which I have been showing in bibliography and words and things, and seeing how many of these can be made into cases which have some sort of standup?
Profile
Reply
|
JohnLindsay
Joined:
28-02-2012
Messages: 116
from London
OFF-Line
| Posted 10-02-2013 at 21:25
I haven't yet returned to another early matter, which was could any reading be suggested?
You never go worse than starting with Plato, for in Phaedrus he deals with a lot of this, and in the Symposium.
We presume the christians' book is already in the stack, for that is the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and gardens, so you know what happens then...
After Plato, things get a bit harder...benefit of knowledge (just to remind us we are on stack)... benefit means good in some sense or other, and knowledge benefit means we have to combine how we know knowledge to be wrong from knowledge we know to be right, and we separate that from the decisions or actions which follow... and we have to remember we are in megalith, not in general thinking, so we might want to build a small table, with Childe (incidently library thing makes a way of doing this in practice) as an anchor point, and going backwards to the sources he cites and moving forward to the sources who cite him?
Now Childe was dealing with the rise of fascism and then the cold war, so we need our table to include the matter of who is thinking what and why, in the context of what is going on around?
Getting a bit general, but it is simple in practice.
The line of thought I followed next. was that the author of the original question, who I don't think I know (in any sense) might be an 11 year old, in which case one line of thought might be appropriate. might be an undergraduate writing an essay, might be a post doctoral, or a museum curator, or a third age enthusiast, and the negotiation of the medium and the message might need to be moderated accordingly?
Profile
Reply
|
JohnLindsay
Joined:
28-02-2012
Messages: 116
from London
OFF-Line
| Posted 10-02-2013 at 21:26
these things take longer to think about and write than to read.
Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|
Main News