On 2013-01-12 07:25, cropredy wrote:
Tiompan,

There was /will be a flow directly down the mall, if I were to concentrate only upon that flow I could follow it wherever it meandered.
I simply picked up that flow shortly after walking across it , I didn't particuarily follow it.
cropredy

On 2013-01-12 11:24, tiompan wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-01-12 07:25, cropredy wrote: Tiompan, There was /will be a flow directly down the mall, if I were to concentrate only upon that flow I could follow it wherever it meandered. I simply picked up that flow shortly after walking across it , I didn't particuarily follow it. cropredy

If it may have meandered how do you know that it continued towards Buck House ?
George

On 2013-01-12 19:16, cropredy wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-01-12 11:24, tiompan wrote: Quote: On 2013-01-12 07:25, cropredy wrote: Tiompan, There was /will be a flow directly down the mall, if I were to concentrate only upon that flow I could follow it wherever it meandered. I simply picked up that flow shortly after walking across it , I didn't particuarily follow it. cropredy If it may have meandered how do you know that it continued towards Buck House ? George

You won't comprehend or possibly contemplate this, but I can simply think of where a nodal point is, thus by moving around near such a point I can triangulate to where it is aprox.
IF I were allowed up on the area of Bucks house I could pin point the exact location to a fraction of an inch.

My rods kept pointing towards that balcony when I tried from different locations.

cropredy

On 2013-01-12 19:28, tiompan wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-01-12 19:16, cropredy wrote: Quote: On 2013-01-12 11:24, tiompan wrote: [quote] On 2013-01-12 07:25, cropredy wrote: Tiompan, There was /will be a flow directly down the mall, if I were to concentrate only upon that flow I could follow it wherever it meandered. I simply picked up that flow shortly after walking across it , I didn't particuarily follow it. cropredy If it may have meandered how do you know that it continued towards Buck House ? George

You won't comprehend or possibly contemplate this, but I can simply think of where a nodal point is, thus by moving around near such a point I can triangulate to where it is aprox.
IF I were allowed up on the area of Bucks house I could pin point the exact location to a fraction of an inch.

My rods kept pointing towards that balcony when I tried from different locations.

cropredy

On 2013-01-12 19:48, cropredy wrote:


[

Quote:

On 2013-01-12 07:25, cropredy wrote: Tiompan, There was /will be a flow directly down the mall, if I were to concentrate only upon that flow I could follow it wherever it meandered. I simply picked up that flow shortly after walking across it , I didn't particuarily follow it. cropredy

If it may have meandered how do you know that it continued towards Buck House ?
George

On 2013-01-13 14:00, Runemage wrote:
Is that quote from a description of Guy Underwood's 'The Pattern of the Past'?

It's near the bottom of the page on this link. I'll quote it all for ease of reference.
http://at37.wordpress.com/page/4/?archives-list&archives-type=tags

The Pattern of the Past
-by Guy Underwood
Hardcover: 192 pages
Publisher: Abelard-Schuman Ltd; 1st edition (July 1973)

“In this remarkable book Guy Underwood explains how he uses water divining. His basic technique is the standard country technique of holding a cleft stick, walking across a field, and watching the stick move when water is present. He then goes on to explain that as well as water lines he can detect energy lines that do not have water under them. He reports that cattle follow these energy lines when they walk across fields. He then goes on to explain how Norman churches build by the Masons in the UK after 1066 also follow these energy lines. Underwood explains how the natural shapes of the lines have lead to the various unique church architectures (such as curved ends around the alter) found in some old churches. The latter part of the book is even more extraordinary in that he states that stone circles (such as Stonehenge) are also built on the same energy lines. He argues that the asymmetries in Stonehenge are there on purpose to match the underlying energy lines, and not the result of wear and tear. Underwood has identified burried stone circles which have been uncovered by archeologists. He also proposes that many Norman churches are built on top of ancient stone circles. It would be excellent if a) science was able to replicate his data and b) if some scientific explanation could be found to match the data. Perhaps he is picking up on a subtle effect in the Earth’s magnetic field, or perhaps an electric field. Or conceivably that some other phenomena is at play here.” -Robert G. Bowerman"

Goodness, it was written 40 years ago and still the debate is the same.

Rune

On 2013-01-13 15:59, Dowser wrote:
.
The claims are much the same dunno about the debate though. There has been no advance on a) and b) above ,or anything that could provide any support for the claims .
Btw Underwood did not find any buried stone circles or anything archaeological that was not in plain sight .He did excavate some barrows but they were obvious and were not found by dowsing . The real tangible claims like the mazes he " found " , one at Stonehenge Bottom have quietly disappeared .

George

On 2013-01-13 17:47, Dowser wrote:


[quote]
On 2013-01-13 17:02, tiompan wrote:
Have you dowsed at Stonehenge ,Spinsters rocks Cerne Abbas etc ?---------
---No.What for?Lines are everywhere,and here in the forest i have enough megalithic constructions (stone cairns mainly,but not only) to examine.No tourists here,places are "virgin".


Those of us who do not accept the claims of dowsers finding " subtle energies " who have used rods " find" spirals and loops , that is not replicating Underwood's data .--------
-------
I'm sure the Underwood's and my drawings are of the same origin and unlike anything else.

On 2013-01-13 18:07, cropredy wrote:
The church is designed to locally fit these variable geometries, and the cathedrals are sited where the number of polygons is in the dozens.