Featured Title:
Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea |
 |
| Roads and Trackways of North Wales |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 139 guests and 6 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> "SUPPRESSED: New Evidence of Early Man"
|
 |
| Author |
"SUPPRESSED: New Evidence of Early Man" |
juamei
Joined:
28-11-2002
Messages: 24
from Buxton
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 14-09-2012 at 12:24
Quote:
|
On 2012-09-08 19:48, tiompan wrote:
Depends on the hardness of your science innit .
Physicists probably see geologists in much the same light as you do archaeologists and mathematicians being the queens are simply unassailable but tend to be less efficient chefs ,vicars , and non techno archaeos .
George
|
|
I'd be remiss to not highlight this xkcd strip after that post
http://xkcd.com/435/
 Profile
 Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2638
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-09-2012 at 12:36
lol .
Archaeos are proably way off to the left of sociologists ,and if they are post processualists /phenomenologists in another dimension created by string theorists .
George
Quote:
|
On 2012-09-14 12:24, juamei wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2012-09-08 19:48, tiompan wrote:
Depends on the hardness of your science innit .
Physicists probably see geologists in much the same light as you do archaeologists and mathematicians being the queens are simply unassailable but tend to be less efficient chefs ,vicars , and non techno archaeos .
George
|
|
I'd be remiss to not highlight this xkcd strip after that post
http://xkcd.com/435/
|
|
Profile
Reply
|
Runemage
Joined:
15-07-2005
Messages: 2412
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-09-2012 at 13:07
I'd be remiss to not highlight this xkcd strip after that post
http://xkcd.com/435/
Lol x2, Good choice I love that site!
Rune
Profile
Reply
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1599
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-09-2012 at 18:36
Since the vast majority of evidence points to man's arrival in the Americas in around 14000 or so BCE, I don't think you can blame the archaeologists for being a bit sceptical when dates like 400,000 BCE are being bandied about. Especially with only one find point with debatable provenance.
And I expect nothing less from the conspiracy theorists who shout "suppression".
Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|
Main News