The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Portesham Stone Row

Featured Title:
Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea
Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea

A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl
A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 132 guests and 3 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> Stones Forum >> Is there any way if this......
New   Reply
Author Is there any way if this......
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 20-05-2012 at 16:58   
Can happen naturally WITHOUT Human help? I stumbled across this today during my walk on the Preseli hills,lets just say it is within a mile of Carn Menyn for now...


By landsker_man at 2012-05-20


By landsker_man at 2012-05-20


By landsker_man at 2012-05-20


By landsker_man at 2012-05-20

I placed my back up camera in a couple of the shots to give it a sense of scale,this is no small rock,I tried to move the top portion myself and failed.....I am open to any suggestions or speculation on this . When you find something like this ,it makes the effort of going off the beaten track worthwhile... I personally cannot see how this stone has been split apart without Human intervention....Im open to ideas...

All the best

Hugh







 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 20-05-2012 at 19:00   
Further to the post above ,I feel the following is relevant ..

1. The stone is within 1 mile of Carn Menyn
2. It is NOT in a place accessible to vehicles,it is in fact difficult to get to across a VERY boggy landscape.
3. If it was being split by a modern farmer to make a post ,why would they pick THIS stone when there are hundreds if not thousands closer to known trackways ,far more readily removable,because of the location of this stone and local dangers ,I feel it could never have been intended for that purpose.
4. Perhaps it is an ancient piece of "work in progress " that went wrong,perhaps it was intended to erect the removed part as a standing stone,given its position,many would not think this idea far fetched.
5. It is a modern piece of "art" intended by some VERY zealous pro Stonehenge Bluestone enthusiast to be left and "found" at a later date...
6. Whoever it was SOMEONE has put a lot of effort into something in a remote place

I would like to post an image showing this stones location ,but would like to invite some speculation first ,not on its position ,but on what this stone may have been intended for...

Food for thought me thinks

all the best

Hugh



[ This message was edited by: Landsker_man on 2012-05-20 19:21 ]




 Profile   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 20-05-2012 at 20:23   
Hi Hugh
It's always difficult to judge from a photo what has happened and normally I would sit on the fence except for one thing..
There is a stone at the far eastern end of the Carn Meini outcrop that appears to have been split (and then has broken) in exactly the same way! The break is V-shaped and so it is not your stone.
Given all the other semi-shaped stones lying around here, I would go for human action.





 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 20-05-2012 at 20:45   
Hi Sem

Hope you are well

Thank you for your input,this stone is overlooked by Carn Menyn,in a rather tricky place to get to,Im going to give you a clue which is probably of greater interest to you....Im sure you remember this stone pointing at a Carn on the horizon...


By landsker_man at 2012-05-20

Well I put a compass on it today,and while the straight edge is pointing to the Carn ,does the info on the compass help you at all?






By landsker_man at 2012-05-20

The stone I found is a long way down the same feature....


All the best

Hugh


[ This message was edited by: Landsker_man on 2012-05-20 20:49 ]




 Profile   Reply
frogcottage42



Joined:
14-02-2010


Messages: 235
from tuosist

OFF-Line

 Posted 20-05-2012 at 22:27   
If it was a stone that was being split but snapped the chock stone or wedge would need to be much smaller because you would not be able to drive that one in. So; either it was split and then that stone was placed there prior to some further use that has never been carried out or it was wedged like that ready for lifting and was never moved. either way it seems near impossible that this was not deliberate human action but there is no way to date it.

Just one of those curio's that only the chap who did it could answer. Without which this site would not exist!




 Profile   Reply
Feanor



Joined:
11-05-2011


Messages: 316
from Cape Cod Massachusetts, US

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-05-2012 at 02:22   
Hi Hugh, Neil here.
With regard to the top few pics ...

I cannot tell if the slab is still whole beneath its longitudinal split. If so perhaps they were attempting to shiver it down the middle?

The lichens tell a story here as well. They are prevalent on the main chunk, and likewise on the shim (or wedge) used between the halves.
Though this flora is difficult to 'date' as it were, the various types have a known life-span and its previous layers are usually in evidence. Therefore it could tell us if the work is more than 500 years old, for example, rather than 20.

I mention this only because, as shown in the photos, the transverse break appears to be fresh. If there are similar lichens on the interior of these 2 faces perhaps a case could be made for the stone's abandonment at the time of the work.
(Let's blame an exuberant, inexperienced apprentice, driving a large wedge to fast!)

For what it's worth, I am with Sem & FC42 in terms of the probability of Human Action.
The fact that its location is well off the beaten track is also a nudge toward the prehistoric.

Is there evidence of any working elsewhere on the stone?
(It looks unnaturally rounded)
Do other stones in the vicinity show the work of hand?

Is the dolerite in the area a known source of the SH Bluestones?

I would be interested in any follow-up on your investigations.
Well done.
Best wishes,
Neil




 Profile  Email   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-05-2012 at 10:55   
Hi Hugh, I've just posted a picture of the one I found and will give a link when the mods have done their bit.
Both stones seem to have been split by exploiting the natural weakness of the bedding plane. If it is by human-hand, I think they may have started with a wooden wedge and then soaked the wood and let it freeze (both of which would make the wood expand). Stone wedges could have then been used to continue the split until a lateral weakness (or a clumsy workman) caused the stone to break.





 Profile   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-05-2012 at 11:38   
Here's the link
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=a312&file=index&do=showpic&pid=89375
Thanks whoever modded this like lightening.
Sem





 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-05-2012 at 20:59   


Quote:

On 2012-05-20 22:27, frogcottage42 wrote:
If it was a stone that was being split but snapped the chock stone or wedge would need to be much smaller because you would not be able to drive that one in. So; either it was split and then that stone was placed there prior to some further use that has never been carried out or it was wedged like that ready for lifting and was never moved. either way it seems near impossible that this was not deliberate human action but there is no way to date it.

Just one of those curio's that only the chap who did it could answer. Without which this site would not exist!



Hi frogcottage42

Yes I agree the the wedge would need to be a little slimmer in order to get a balanced, clean more controlled break,it must have been rather difficult trying to pound that wedge into there. Imagine this though,an ambitious slightly less experienced stone splitter,maybe a youngster "having a go" not listening to his teacher decides to carry on because he thinks knows better,breaks the stone then in his moment of anger when he realises he should have listened gives it a couple of almighty whacks in frustration? Sound familiar? I think we have all been there....

All the best

Hugh



[ This message was edited by: Landsker_man on 2012-05-23 21:16 ]




 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-05-2012 at 21:15   


Quote:

On 2012-05-22 02:22, Feanor wrote:
Hi Hugh, Neil here.
With regard to the top few pics ...

I cannot tell if the slab is still whole beneath its longitudinal split. If so perhaps they were attempting to shiver it down the middle?

The lichens tell a story here as well. They are prevalent on the main chunk, and likewise on the shim (or wedge) used between the halves.
Though this flora is difficult to 'date' as it were, the various types have a known life-span and its previous layers are usually in evidence. Therefore it could tell us if the work is more than 500 years old, for example, rather than 20.

I mention this only because, as shown in the photos, the transverse break appears to be fresh. If there are similar lichens on the interior of these 2 faces perhaps a case could be made for the stone's abandonment at the time of the work.
(Let's blame an exuberant, inexperienced apprentice, driving a large wedge to fast!)

For what it's worth, I am with Sem & FC42 in terms of the probability of Human Action.
The fact that its location is well off the beaten track is also a nudge toward the prehistoric.

Is there evidence of any working elsewhere on the stone?
(It looks unnaturally rounded)
Do other stones in the vicinity show the work of hand?

Is the dolerite in the area a known source of the SH Bluestones?

I would be interested in any follow-up on your investigations.
Well done.
Best wishes,
Neil



Hi Neil

I agree this has to have been done by Human hand there is no question,but its the age that needs to be reckoned . As you rightly say it seems to be the Lichen has been disturbed "in the wake" of the wedges path and although it has begun to grow back it needs to be estimated as to how old this break is. I know of someone who is a qualified botanist whom I will be supplying a disc of photos and maybe a "cutting" of the Lichen to estimate the growth rates. I also intend to go back there very soon to try to get answers to the list of questions i have been asked regarding this stone.
I am willing to let you know the stone is actually closer than i originally quoted it is in fact within a few hundred yards of the Carn Menyn"bluestone" outcrops" and yes there is another stone I have spotted that appears to have work done along an edge....


By landsker_man at 2012-05-23


By landsker_man at 2012-05-23


By landsker_man at 2012-05-23

This stone looked like it has been "propped" here in this position and work done along this "sharp" edge,all the other stones do not appear to present such sharp edges,I believe this stone has been modified.

I will post here any further findings when i return to the site

All the very best

Hugh



[ This message was edited by: Landsker_man on 2012-05-23 21:18 ]




 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-05-2012 at 21:36   


Quote:

On 2012-05-22 11:38, sem wrote:
Here's the link
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=a312&file=index&do=showpic&pid=89375
Thanks whoever modded this like lightening.
Sem





Hi Sem

Wow interesting indeed,Im going to have a look for this stone also ....

Im going to go back on my next walk and get some clearer photos of the lichen and lateral split on the stone ,which looks "newer" than the main split. I just hope it is not some modern crank who has done this intending for the lichen to grow back so it could not be dated easily, I have one doubt over the stone I found and that is the depth the wedge stone is inside the body of the main stone,it would be rather difficult and awkward to have hit that in there,given the low position of the stone without a modern heavy hammer to swing with I fear but even that would not be easy given the angle to work with... Perhaps some modern archaeologists have been "experimenting with technique" deciding to leave it there to be discovered later by someone when the lichen has hopefully covered the wedges path....






 Profile   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-05-2012 at 22:04   
..or a log of wood inserted into the split after the stone wedge, and you then hit this with the hammer?





 Profile   Reply
Landsker_man



Joined:
11-12-2011


Messages: 49
from Pembrokeshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-05-2012 at 06:45   


Quote:

On 2012-05-23 22:04, sem wrote:
..or a log of wood inserted into the split after the stone wedge, and you then hit this with the hammer?




Yes!! Never thought of that one....that could certainly explain the depth of the wedge....like we would use a center punch to drive a nail into wood today......






 Profile   Reply
Dragonsinger



Joined:
09-05-2012


Messages: 21
from Bradford

OFF-Line

 Posted 13-09-2012 at 19:39   
Oh come on guys.

Picture this:

Ancient Brit monument builder and apprentice.
Wooden wedge driven in along the bedding plane. CRACK!! Right either we need more wedges or... Hang on a mo, bung that lump of rock in there.
Great! Let's do that again, and again, and.. OH $%&^"!I dropped the hammerstone on my foot. I'm going for a lie down.

OK it's a fantasy

Mabey.

Regards
Jim




 Profile   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 13-09-2012 at 21:19   
Hi Jim
It doesn't have to be an apprentice making the mistake. Most chunks of stone have internal weaknesses that can only be estimated by looking at the exterior. Maybe it's just a case of pass another stone the last one split - a very old and (depending on the subject) rude joke.
Best wishes
Sem





 Profile   Reply
Dragonsinger



Joined:
09-05-2012


Messages: 21
from Bradford

OFF-Line

 Posted 14-09-2012 at 10:49   
Hi Sem

OK point taken.
But is the scenario valid?

Regards
Jim




 Profile   Reply
sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 Posted 14-09-2012 at 11:29   
Yes Jim





 Profile   Reply
New   Reply
Jump To
 
Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.