On 2012-01-29 19:34, jonm wrote:
Anyone know what the exact position of the pits was eventually determined to be?

Mike Pitt's site

On 2012-01-29 23:18, tDrusin wrote:
pits were probably mining excavations to test for the types of rock. A bit like a core sample. Grims Graves, Grims Groven (quarry) is a good example of what happens when they find something.

http://mythicmysteriesmiscellany.devhub.com/blog/category/early-mining/

On 2012-01-29 23:36, cropredy wrote:

Quote:

On 2012-01-29 23:18, tDrusin wrote: pits were probably mining excavations to test for the types of rock. A bit like a core sample. Grims Graves, Grims Groven (quarry) is a good example of what happens when they find something. http://mythicmysteriesmiscellany.devhub.com/blog/category/early-mining/

This post is a little bit like the chicken and egg question.
The flint was there before they mined it.
It was there because of the location of where it was.
It formed in that precise location because of TRANSMUTATION.
The transmutation occured at that precise location because of universal geometries meeting there.

Those mining for the flint will have developed an understanding of this, and of the locations to look.

The location remains there even when mining has occured, in fact then the very very finite location of where the flint transmuted is actually available, and may have caused the miners to become ILLUMINATED.
That is their pineal glands may have been been affected by the location they attained, they thus will suddenly have KNOWN.

That is all hard to verbalise , as the knowledge and comprehension of what I am talking of is not generally understood or accepted.
cropredy

Not yet Jon , but even without the exact positions , the procession info due south from the "mid point " to the centre of the monument supplies enough on it's own to show they are wrong .

On 2012-01-30 07:22, jonm wrote:

Quote:

Not yet Jon , but even without the exact positions , the procession info due south from the "mid point " to the centre of the monument supplies enough on it's own to show they are wrong .

Thanks George. Agreed, their theory does not appear to hold up as it appears to be mathematically impossible. I have an interesting alternative idea of what it could be for, but the idea only works if there's a certain angle between the pits relative to an East-East line.

The reason it's interesting is that the idea, if true, could predict the location of other undiscovered features at both cursuses.

Cheers

Jon

Jon , seeing as they are undated (and therefore possibly not contemporaneous ), unexcavated anomalies is it worthwhile basing any ideas on their possible connection ?

On 2012-01-30 12:42, jonm wrote:

Quote:

Jon , seeing as they are undated (and therefore possibly not contemporaneous ), unexcavated anomalies is it worthwhile basing any ideas on their possible connection ?

Probably not George. The idea's foundation comes from another place, so the potential link with the cursuses is just a happen-stance bonus. It would make an interesting back-reference if the angle turns out to be configured for Stonehenge's latitude.

On 2012-01-30 14:26, tDrusin wrote:
This is a MUST SEE video of mining techniques called banka mining for alluvial plains using equipment available to bronze aged man. It also explains evidence of early core samples.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wtNK6cVRcU

On 2012-01-30 14:51, tDrusin wrote:
nope, it was a modern drilling. I am in contact with someone who coordinates international mining industries. He also posted that video, you can check his credentials. He's incredibly smart and because of his knowledge believes 100% mining and trade inspired all those megaliths.

On 2012-01-30 15:40, tDrusin wrote:
thank you for your support, one of the reasons i am doing all this is because i fear we will continue down the same path we have always taken. That we once had technologies that were lost and took thousands of years to relearn is a frightening scenario. without our history as an anchor we float about heedlessly mindlessly towards our future.

Jon , don't be shy , what's yer angle ?

On 2012-01-30 17:56, cropredy wrote:
LittlEnki,
Listen carefully, I am typing this very S.l.o.w.l.y, and You may forget.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4I9DMSvJxg

I think all will agree that humans have forgotten what the pits, or the cursus were for?
That's because We may have simply forgotten.
There is very little evidence of previous advanced civilizations because the planet may have forgotten.
And the memory loss may affect everything down to certain depths of the then current surface area.

Everything only exists because it is remembering to be, or not to be.
Imagine a vast flow of a force that enables memory overloading where the grand canyon is, the gap shows it's pathway, and the gap shows where previously was mass remembering to be whatever it was, then in the blink of an eye...it forgot.
No smoke or catastrophe, just space that the atmosphere then filled.

Imagine a less violent overload of this force suddenly embracing this plant, and say all in it's pathway for 3 feet down from the surface forgot to be, and only certain high points around the planet escaped.
It's a sort of tale of the great flood type, but not of water but of memory, such an event may cause great confusion to good old C14 testing???

All that may remain would be areas of where the memory loss was least effective, sort of high concentration points of the then memory flows....stonehenge, the pyramids etc etc.
But the next civilization will have no memory of WHY they were built , or how.
But there may be some of the memory still here?

I hope that was written slowly enough?
cropredy