On 2011-12-22 17:25, cropredy wrote:

Quote:

On 2011-12-22 16:36, jonm wrote: Many thanks Tom, that's dead useful. Looked at it again; it's the smaller one (the male one) that is dead centre of the circle by the look of it? Looked at it on google (should have gone there when visiting my uncle) and, viewed from the West (see image), the top surface of the 'male' stone appears to point North and up to the pole star: Is that just an optical illusion or does it really do that? [ This message was edited by: jonm on 2011-12-22 16:37 ]

The circles are sited upon vortex points of implosion and emmitance.
The angles of the sheets of geometry that are detectable vary , but I would suspect that the stone is indeed cut( as are multiple stones) to FIT onto the geometry.
Paul demonstrates the consequences with His photography of ORBS.

The pyramids with their angles demonstate how they were FITTED to the geometry at that location, it is fixed geometry but the transfer about in universe that travels along the sheets is variable relative to resistances across the sheets.
The whole of universe is a continuum of transfer that is orchestra like, I am humbled to be able to follow it easily.
I can only report as I detect, and wish I was doing it full time as I am convinced those involved with building the sites were.
cropredy

On 2011-12-21 17:23, cropredy wrote:
Thats what drives Me on, otherwise You would see the end of me here.
IMHO,
All of creation is composed of the duality of spin that is detectable both as spin and as flowing in seperate meandering river like pathways.
The flows also layer on top of each other and travel in exactly the opposite directions.
the flows widths are detectable, and vary continually, both in width and directions.
Without doubt the variations are caused by solar planets and moons , as they trundle about in whatever way they do.

You are composed of this duality most often depicted as serpents, as is every atom, as is each planet and star.
It is a self similer system that transfers about( look up Birkeland currents)

It is My personal comprehension that our none physical selves are eternal, and enter and exit into life and occupy the physical .
I also consider that our ancestors knew all of this intimately, and certain groups of them knew how to utilise this knowledge to locally reincarnate back to their tribe.

I am also really understanding and operating with these flows in a human to human capacity, which is a subject on it's own, but the personal duality field is definately upliftable , and We are fully self repairing beings....IF We have sufficient capacity of the duality of flows, most people are sadly almost totally discharged.

I would ask for tolerance in all of this as I am somewhat flying by the seat of My pants alone.
If I have offended You in the past it was not mean't other than retaliation and I most sincerely apologise.
I am desperately trying not to offend anymore, and it is upto Me to learn how to best cope with understandable sceptism.
cropredy...kevin

On 2011-12-23 10:47, Runemage wrote:
I think you may have misunderstood, Karloff.
The mounds/ reincarnation theory says that the ancient places were used in ritual to attract the "spirit" of the deceased to return to their local area, a bit like the Tibetans believe the Dalai Lama is the same spirit reincarnated time and time again - although they do go and search for him whereas the mounds and reincarnation theory is much more area-specific.

Rune

On 2011-12-23 10:47, Runemage wrote:
I think you may have misunderstood, Karloff.
The mounds/ reincarnation theory says that the ancient places were used in ritual to attract the "spirit" of the deceased to return to their local area, a bit like the Tibetans believe the Dalai Lama is the same spirit reincarnated time and time again - although they do go and search for him whereas the mounds and reincarnation theory is much more area-specific.

Rune

On 2011-12-22 16:36, jonm wrote:
the top surface of the 'male' stone appears to point North and up to the pole star:

Is that just an optical illusion or does it really do that?




[ This message was edited by: jonm on 2011-12-22 16:37 ]

On 2011-12-22 16:36, jonm wrote:


Looked at it again; it's the smaller one (the male one) that is dead centre of the circle by the look of it?




[ This message was edited by: jonm on 2011-12-22 16:37 ]

It appears to have the angles of BOTH stones what does the female one look at?

On 2011-12-29 09:58, jonm wrote:
Thanks Roger, I think I'm with it

Quote:

It appears to have the angles of BOTH stones what does the female one look at?

Hi Roger

The female one doesn't look at anything! It's required as a part of an early system.

There's somewhere else where this same system is done in a huge amount of detail (but it would take bloody ages to draw up the graphics to explain why and how it works). The 'female' stone at Avebury appears to be aligned, sized and placed to be a very rudimentary copy of that system.

It may just be a coincidence that the female stone seems to be in the right place: To be a confirmatory copy, there would have been a second female stone to the North West of the centre stone and with similar special features. I understand that there was a second stone to the North West of centre, but it's not there now so there's not much in the way of confirmation.

Another, possibly more interesting place is taking my time up at the moment: I have to go and check using a theodolite before I post up the details as it looks too good to be true. More to follow!

Jon

Alexander Thom suggested that Avebury was constructed with a definitely indicated site to site alignment with Deneb

Jon,

can you summarise your theory in reference to Avebury? Well at least as far as the cove is concerned? How does this theory relate to other sections of Avebury. Do you think there could be a real possibility of the site being an observation/ learning center for aspects of the heavens.