Featured: Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Hare and Tabor T Shirts for discerning antiquarians

Random Image


Chittorgarh fort

The Archaeology of People: Dimensions of Neolithic Life, Whittle

The Archaeology of People: Dimensions of Neolithic Life, Whittle

Who's Online

There are currently, 337 guests and 3 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsors

Moderated by : davidmorgan , Andy B , Klingon , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> Stonehenge connection to the Great Pyramid
New  Reply
Page 17 of 19 ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 )
AuthorStonehenge connection to the Great Pyramid
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-11-2016 at 16:00   
Hi Cerrig

the calc is in inches till you get to the 12 x 12 x 10 bit.


897.6 x 12 = 10771.2 / 272 = 39.6

cheers

Dave




 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 2803
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-11-2016 at 17:45   
Righto.....


cerrig




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 7171
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-11-2016 at 17:47   
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/stonehenge-prehistoric-religious-ceremonial-centre-discovered-archaeologists-a7425346.html

Kevin




 Profile   Reply
Orpbit



Joined:
24-06-2012


Messages: 1551
from Shropshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-11-2016 at 19:11   
Cropredy,

That's an interesting link. Thanks for the extra referral to it.

http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=7173&forum=4&start=20

Relevant to many a discussion!

Cheers.




 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 2803
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-11-2016 at 19:32   
I don't know if you're aware of this one David. Should be right up your street.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfniXVeK-g4

cerrig






 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-11-2016 at 10:56   
Hi Cerrig

i watched it last night and skipped bits till i got to the numbers at the end. i have not seen it before but it has the wow factor and Hugh's work is put into context. the imperial system is part of the design brief just as Hugh has proved and the conclusion in respect of natural numbers is the same. thanks for posting it. Incidentally 52.359 or 0.52359 exists within the imperial system in a different form but evidences the fact that the imperial is a system of ancient mathematical compromise just as Thom's system is.

It is derived from 66/56

It is pi divided by 6 (multiply by 7 and see what you get) in the imperial, it is about time.

cheers
Dave

[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-11-23 11:01 ]




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-11-2016 at 12:21   
This is the new link to Stonehenge / Gt. Pyramid / Circle geometry etc., but it only leads to them if your preferred browser is either Google Chrome, Firefox or Internet Explorer.

https://imageshack.com/a/oEBb/1

It is best to copy this and paste it into the search box at the TOP of the page, and then press Enter.
Good luck,


This does not work

Does anyone have the image please?




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-11-2016 at 12:37   
Hugh uses root 3 divided by 2 and i have used root 0.75 in its place but now realise this is misleading.

root 3 is 1.732050808

and so we can see Richard's number 17.32 used in the analysis of the SH Avebury relationship.


the evidence strongly suggests that they rounded this to use with Pi based on 52 as follows

17.333r x 1632/520 = 54.4 ( so 17.333r/2 x Pi = 2.72 )

x 2 = 34.666r x Pi = 108.8 this is the eclipse year x Pi.

So they consciously made this adjustment as they did for the imperial to give 176 using 56 x Pi.

So they have based their system on the numbers 52,56,66, and 68 and both these systems are a conscious compromise whereas there are no compromises in Hugh's system or Richard's.

The logic for the two calculations is the same and both use a lunar base number.

using root 0.75 the roundings can be suggested

root 0.75 is 1.732050808/2 = 0.866025404 rounded to 0.8666r x 6 = 5.2 ( so 17.32 becomes 17.33r the distance between SH and Avebury x 3 = 52.)

Real Pi 3.141592654 rounded to 3.138461538 and this is 1632/520 so the 52 cancels out as was their intention.

So 0.8666r x 1632/520 = 2.72 the megalithic yard exactly using intentional rounding of Hugh's calculations,

Hughs calc gives 2.720699046 and we know or suspect they do intentional rounding based on Thom's outputs and here is another one. This is rounded to 2.7207.

2.7207 x 3333.3333r = 9069 the great pyramid base in imperial inches with no complicated maths and totally insignificant (but very significant) rounding of Hugh Franklin's calculations.

This is why the 333.333 degree ley has been traced from the centre of the Aubrey hitting so many 'hillforts' and other sacred sites. if you read Watkins this is a 'null' chance happening. The hillforts in particular Old Sarum ( ley line central) are most probably megalithic not iron age constructions if you read Cropredy. Looking at some of the Derbyshire hillforts the question has to be - why would you build a fort in such an inaccesible location with absolutely no water supply and only one exit.

If the canon is used then


degrees 333.3333333
x400/360 370.3703704
x360x1000 133333333.3
divide by5280 25252.52525
x99/100 25000
x4 100000











[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-11-24 11:53 ]




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-11-2016 at 12:23   
This is what Hugh has to say about the dimensions of the great pyramid

' It also means that the base side is 1/360th of 100,000 MY, and thus the circumference must be 1/180th of100,000 MY., and that the height is 277.777...Ö3 feet.


Dividing the units in the base side of a Pi-type Pyramid by (2.720699... /2), produces the base side of an Equilateral triangle having the same vertical height . In the case of Gt.Pyramid, this Equilateral triangle will have sides of 555.555...feet.



So it looks as though our Imperial inch governs the dimensions of the Gt. Pyramid., and Piazzi Smyth's numerical coincidence he found between the pyramid's height and the distance from Earth to the Sun was perfectly correct.

93,000,000 / (5773.5... * Ö3) = 9300


Now repeat the exercise using the quoted dimensions in cubits: base 440 cubits., therefore height = circumference (880) / Pi = 280.11269... cubits. Transfer this to a 30/60 triangle, and the base will be 485.169... cubits. (which makes a cubit equal to 5773.5026... inches / 280.11269... = 20.61135... inches or 523.528... mm.)


This number , albeit 4851.69... , has been met before. It is the number of English feet in a Roman Mile.

(Petrie also gives his Roman Mile as 58220+/- 4 inches, whereas mine is 58220.33 inches.)


It is also 13200 ft / 2.72069...,, and 13200 ft. is 2.5 Statute Miles or 4851.69... Meg Yards.'


If you watch the vid Cerrig posted this explains why they are getting the numbers in their calculations. It is a Pi pyramid. (real Pi)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfniXVeK-g4

http://hew_frank.tripod.com/id39.htm



[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-11-24 12:27 ]




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 7171
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 25-11-2016 at 19:09   
http://www.thegreatpyramidofgiza.ca/content/
Is this already in this thread?
Kevin




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 26-11-2016 at 01:09   
hi kevin

if the maths on salisbury plain comes together

your rods are going to be blown clean out of your hands

when does newton's law of gravity cease to exist?
never stop searching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPAzwUhXnzs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-WPexVEujg#t=17.3622788

cheers

davek

<

[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-11-26 01:32 ]




 Profile   Reply
cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 7171
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 Posted 26-11-2016 at 19:57   
In the link I posted are classic assumptions relative to gravity.
There are several mentions of what the gravity of the moon and the sun vary here upon earth.

There is no such entity or force as gravity.

But due to almost ALL HUMANS BEEN BELIEVERS IN GRAVITY IT IS TOTALLY ACCEPTED AS BEEN CORRECT.

What is abundantly clear about SH and the pyramids is ancient mans ABILITITY TO MOVE UNREAL MASSIVE STONES ABOUT.

and this will have been due to them having no concept of anything called gravity, but a clear understanding of what causes the net implosion into this planet currently assumed as gravity, and how to locally reverse this to overcome at rest weight.

The only time My rods have been nearly wrenched from My grip is during an earthquake, which demonstrated how the flows of consciousness cause displacement in location relative to their flow rate.

Kevin




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 30-11-2016 at 20:36   
Hermites constant is

https://www.easycalculation.com/constant/hermite-constant.html

I have it in my calcs as root3 /2

but it is 2/root 3

This is 1.154700538 A

not 0.866025404 B

A/B is 1.3333333r

as at the great pyramid.

at last I get it Hugh.











 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 01-12-2016 at 13:45   
Let's just look at one aspect of what Hugh is saying.

'It also means that the base side is 1/360th of 100,000 MY'

100,000 / 360 = 277.777r MY

So 4 sides are 1111.111r MY

Divide by 10 x 9 = 1000. A sacred unit.( 10/9 is 400/360)

Hugh's calculation for the megalithic yard with the very slightest of tweaks is 2.7207 feet

277.777r x 2.7207 is 755.75 feet exactly.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pyramids-of-Giza

But when he uses the HFC that is when the fun starts

755.75 / hfc = 440 x 4 = 1760. THE MILE UNIT.

So it can be 440 A or 277.777r B

A/B = 1.584 inches

in feet is 0.132.

The Avebury using Thom's dimensions

897.6 / 0.132 = 6800 the nodal and eclipse prediction.

Hugh has calculated that at whatever latitude they were standing at ( and they knew it ) they knew the speed they were travelling at.

Well they would wouldn't they?

Give us a break Hugh.

These numbers were used in France 2000 years before 3200BC so 5200BC very near to Sem's workings for the bridge to Europe and his seed findings. These timings seem to be way out but the evidence is there.

From a Cropredy link

Schmitz, Eckhart R., 1962-
The Great Pyramid of Giza :
decoding the measure of a monument
/ by Eckhart R. Schmitz.


{{{{{Perhaps the most famous Astronomical Temple in Egypt is located at Luxor known as
the Temple of Karnak which is dedicated to Ammon-Ra, however the inscriptions relate
to Ra and Horus in the name of Ra-Hor-Akhty meaning “Sun rising Sun brilliant on the horizon”. At this temple complex there exists an immense central hall which stretches approximately one kilometer with a precise bearing of 26 degrees south of East to 26 degrees north of west. The British Astronomer Sir J. Norman Lockyer, in his book “The Dawn of Astronomy” (1894), argued that the axis of the central hall was deliberately aligned with the Solstices. From his calculations, Lockyer deciphered that at the time of the Winter Solstice, in the period when the temple was built, exactly at sunrise, the Sun would shine the entire length of the central hall directly through a doorway into the inner sanctuary of the temple. In so doing it would focus precisely on a statue of Ra. This effect would last only a few minutes. By Lockyer’s calculations he dated the construction of this particular part of the temple complex at approx. 3700 BC (15)}}}}}

3700 BC?




[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-12-01 14:05 ]




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 14-12-2016 at 13:50   
The suspicion has been that these units are a product of completely logical and rational thought and that the relationships between the prime numbers lie at the root of ancient metrology, so units can be taken out of the equation and the solution will be mathematical, explaining the units as a result.

Astronomy will have been a big influence on system design and base 17 will be as far as is needed to express the nodal and their obsession with all things lunar and number 28.

They seem to have been impressed by 2 to the power 7 and 8 (56) and the link to the cycle of women (28)

The 364 day year was examined in my first book ( a full chapter)as it was a stand out number 7 x 4 x 13, or 4 x 91 or 28 x 13 and of course derived from the work of Alexander Thom.

So we can look at the primes from 1 to 17

These are 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x13 x 17.

This product is 510510.

To include 2 to the power 7 multiply by 64.

32672640

This is 2 x 6 x 10 x 14 x 22 x 26 x 34.

Thom has given us the Aubrey circle circumference and divide by

89760.

This gives 364.

If we multiply this unit 510510 by 56

28588560

by pi 22/7

89849760

divide by 89760

1001.

This is intentional because 510510 / 510 is 1001.

the unit in the diamter gives the circumference.

And 510/3x4 is 680 10 of Thom's megalithic rods the nodal cycle.

I am copyrighting this on the portal as no units are required.

It does seem that they were searching for evidence that higher intelligence was involved in the creation of their universe and expressed it through their systems of measurement as Peter and Hugh have proved.

How anyone can say that there are 56 posts round the aubrey circle just because there are, and have any credibility at all, is completely beyond me.









 Profile   Reply
hewpop



Joined:
29-10-2005


Messages: 96
from Devon

OFF-Line

 Posted 16-12-2016 at 11:48   
David K, recently you put up an Hermites’ constant of 1.154700538. Now I didn’t know this was one of his, but I recognised the number as one which I had happened upon. Look back at the bottom of page 10 on this posting, at the diameter of the third of the three nested hexagons, and the notations underneath. The diameter of the Gt.Pyr circle is 11547.00538 inches.

Now to David M, the Morgan one. Apologies for my late reply.
Yes , there are lots more Pyramids about in Egypt and elsewhere, but if they have square bases, no matter what units of measure they were laid out with, or how many, the geometry and ratios of the morphed circle’s circumference, its inside equilateral triangle and the outer hexagon will always be the same.

Side of the square will be ¼ of the circumference, this divided by 0.9068996821 will be the side of the enclosed equilateral triangle, which itself X 1.1547005 etc. will be the circle diameter, or by 4 to give the units in the hexagon. Start off your excursion with a triangle side of one (1) unit.






 Profile  Email   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 16-12-2016 at 20:18   
Thanks Hugh

interesting is it not that Jon M is suddenly getting into numberology and diameters? Diameters can hide sacred numbers according to the metrologists such as Michell.

Have you told him the diameter of the Aubrey is 42 megalithic rods circumference 132 and difference 90?

Sytems can hide other systems as well, take the imperial.

the mile 5280 x 2.5 is 13200.

The hidden number within this is a translation from base 99 one step from the (base 100 sacred)?

13200 x 100/99 = 133333.33r

You say 'The diameter of the Gt.Pyr circle is 11547.00538 inches. '

Giving your circumference of 36275.98727 inches the perimeter of the GP as discovered by Petrie.

It would be most marvellous to find something hidden in this diameter (Hermites constant) 11547.00538

You have to square it to get 133333333 the base unit of the system hidden within the imperial.













 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 2803
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 16-12-2016 at 21:18   
David, you're slacking; 132 - 90 = 42. One more for my list I think!!

cerrig




 Profile   Reply
DavidK



Joined:
17-10-2014


Messages: 1329
from Derbyshire

OFF-Line

 Posted 16-12-2016 at 22:50   
a busted flush cerrig

trumped by the unit of infinite oneness 1.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111r

'David, you're slacking; 132 - 90 = 42. One more for my list I think!! '

132 x UOIO = 14.6666666666666666666r

90 x UOIO = 10

42 x UOIO = 4.66666666666666666666r

14.66r - 4.66r = 10 (the sacred unit)?

well at least according to Alexander Thom.

mate using Queen sacrifice.


just to explain

one of the base units of the imperial system ( there are many)
is the eclipse prediction unit of 14.66666 days. Divide it by 2 x 3 to get 22 days the numerator of megalithic Pi. ( one of many versions)

this is evidence they knew the Saros exactly as 6585.3333r days.

everyting about their systems is consecutive numbers.

try 21 and 22 over 6 and 7 and mix them up, it is an education in the relationship of the Sun and Moon.

This number is found in Hugh's GP workings

14.6666666666666666666666r /4 = 3.66666666666666666r x 1440 = 5280


1440 is the number of minutes in a day.!4 666r is eclipse prediction.

All the UOIO is is 400/360 and this is the canon of ancient measure squaring the circle.

3.24 is a key number, it translates to 27 3/4 of 36.

come on cerrig catch up.

something for you to ponder on that vid you posted about the GP and the maths involved( thanks for posting it )

3.3 3.666666667
0.523809524( this converts using real pi at the GP)
14.14285714
396











[ This message was edited by: DavidK on 2016-12-16 23:23 ]




 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 2803
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 16-12-2016 at 23:54   
14.4 x 2.5 = 36, x2.5 = 90, x 2.5=225, x 2.5= 562.5, x 2.5= 1406.25.
This is an example of the Canon of number David. There's no need for all the complications. This is a series that has some profound significance, and it's so simple, but it's not evidence that anyone knew anything, or needed to. This is there regardless.

Alexander Thom would be amazed at all the things he's discovering on these threads

cerrig




 Profile   Reply
Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
New  Reply
Jump To

Sponsors