The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Badami Cave temple

Featured Title:
Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea
Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea

Sacred Sites Calendar 2013
Sacred Sites Calendar 2013

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 127 guests and 3 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> Working Reconstructed Stone Circles
New   Reply
Page 5 of 23 ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 )
Author Working Reconstructed Stone Circles
Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2412
from UK

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:00   
Thanks George, I wasn't aware of that. It's what's so good about the forums, always something to learn

Cerrig, that is a very strange collection of symbols on that stone.

Chris - your image didn't appear, I'm assuming we're discussing a roof like an iron-age roundhouse, but on a stone circle?

I still have to keep asking - Why? - a lot of times.

IF the ancients wanted to do all the things you reckon they did, why not do it where they lived, why travel so far from home?

Why have hot stones a huge distance away from a water-supply if it was desired to heat the water? People make life as easy as they can for themselves.

Exactly what sort of trials does one need to carry out to realize this is possible? A simple primitive big stone could just as easily do the task, even a low one. If we ever get to solar discussion I may show some pretty poor models that work.

A working scale model in your back garden would be a good start, with photographs of its construction, times of opening and closing doors, temperature readings of the dark stones, times for drying grain, temperature of the heated water, how long it took etc. Video it, put it on youtube - that's how many ideas are presented nowadays.

The dark stones, as every english kid is taught in school, were pilfered to make new buildings.

No, that's not what's taught in school here. If the dark stones were pilfered to make new buildings, then where are they now? Special stones like that would be prominent in any building.

Some churches are built on the site of circles, many have stones on display like the one Cerrig linked to, or tucked away in their crypts or under floors or reworked into 'Celtic' crosses and suchlike within their grounds, but they are not dark stones, I've seen plenty. If they previously had the significance you claim, rest assured, the church would have made great efforts to show the congregation that God made these stones special.

Also, don't forget, just because ancient man could have carried out certain tasks, it doesn't mean to say he did so. The same is true today. there are a myriad things we could do, but many we simply don't.

Rune




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2652
OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:01   


Quote:

On 2011-06-23 21:45, SecretsoftheSunSects wrote:
George

I guess I am out of luck then, since a solar building would hardly have a hearth, maybe that's the problem? Probably no a very good idea having a fire in a tent anyway, unless one wishes to make a new tent each week. The amerindians do manage it of course.

At school every English kid is taught that the romans used to build their new temples next to the pagan sites. Eventually the pagan sites fell into disrepair as the attendance dropped because everyone loved a good old roman sing song. At this point the the residents took the stones. I know it is a crass place to learn history, but the ethos still runs today, inner city churches are being reconsecrated as mosques.

Some of the finest pagan altar stones can be found in the best cathedrals according to Prof Fell. The irony is lost on the christian builders.

Of course the best sites were built over, what scholar thinks that the neoliths did not populate the most conducive environments next to rivers and other useful things. Look under Leamington spa, bath, coventry, birmingham ....Wherever there was water, there were neoliths. The sites we have left are really at the edges of the neolithic empire. Do you seriously think they only inhabited the remote spots where the circles are found?

You are beginning to make me think I am in a crowd of one.

Chris



English kids are not taught that dark stones were pilfered or anything about stone cirles being found at the site of large towns , there may well have been but you don't know any . Prof Fell was a prof of zoology what he has to say about archaeology is highly suspect and about as useful as Von Daniken , Donnelly , Livy , Herodotus .etc for any understaning of prehistory
George






 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:03   
George

I just looked at your types of structures, you guys are the experts, you tell me which of the chambered cairns, brocks, narghe, barrows, etc...

Yes tombs and religious centers, well that seems to be just about all that was built in any age according to the standard view. Oast houses narghe, cairns - caves, barrows - caves, circles roundhouses and tents. There some sardinian examples still with the roofs on.

first chambered cairn I looked at in loughcrew seems a contender, even shows the sun landing on the nice stone at the back. Would be nice to find a type with altar stones in them, but as previous post indicated one would need to know which the various inheritors did not take. I am sure a few on this board know. Can't help wondering why people would lug stones huge distances from wales when any old stone will do?

Hey george if you do not wish to think that the neoliths actually lived indoors that is ok with me. All they did was ritualize and bury the dead if thats what you want to think. However, if you think there is a chance the functions supported the people in a useful way, carry on.

The accounts Herodotus lays out in Histories when the Egyptians are telling him the proto history of Egypt.

Chris




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2652
OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:19   


Quote:

On 2011-06-23 22:03, SecretsoftheSunSects wrote:
George

I just looked at your types of structures, you guys are the experts, you tell me which of the chambered cairns, brocks, narghe, barrows, etc...

Yes tombs and religious centers, well that seems to be just about all that was built in any age according to the standard view. Oast houses narghe, cairns - caves, barrows - caves, circles roundhouses and tents. There some sardinian examples still with the roofs on.

first chambered cairn I looked at in loughcrew seems a contender, even shows the sun landing on the nice stone at the back. Would be nice to find a type with altar stones in them, but as previous post indicated one would need to know which the various inheritors did not take. I am sure a few on this board know. Can't help wondering why people would lug stones huge distances from wales when any old stone will do?

Hey george if you do not wish to think that the neoliths actually lived indoors that is ok with me. All they did was ritualize and bury the dead if thats what you want to think. However, if you think there is a chance the functions supported the people in a useful way, carry on.

The accounts Herodotus lays out in Histories when the Egyptians are telling him the proto history of Egypt.

Chris


Good ,you are starting to have a look at these monumnets you have been lecturing on .
There is no passage grave in Loughcrew that is aligned to any solstice and none have a central stone dark stone .Any more of the many ?
So there wasn't an Egyptian account it was Herodotus being told that by the Egyptians and you believe that ? I'd like to see what he has to say nevertheless .
You don't know what I think and thats the second time you have put words into my mouth .When did I say "neoliths didn't actually live indoors "


George




 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:19   
Rune

I read these pages as one long list of posts, the answers are there.

Roofs for circles were tent like, smaller ones possibly wooden. These big ones were for living in and a secondary function for food and crops. In the tropics it is much easier since they did not need warm accomodation except in very unusual circumstances.

The roofed structures now are the small chamber structures generally associated with burials or some primitive ceremonies. Aligned to the sun with an altar stone at the end for various 'sacrifices' to be made.
Chamber cairns, barrows,... so many different names across the world I do not know where to start. All the same format just taller, fatter, rounder, squarer etc.. Nice warm rock at the end, piles of insulation, that is it simple.

As for models and videos, the results confirmed by calculation for a few structures are in the appendix of my book and seeing as they have a few calcs in there no one is gonna read them. Unless of course you are volunteering?

As for where the stones are in churches see my prev post.

do you have some reason to object to our ancient residents having homes and warmth? Once we get over the rather pedestrian idea that the structures could have housed people there may be much more interesting things to discuss.

chris





 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:27   
George

you are just being argumentative now, the loughcrew site was top of the list of chambered carins in here. The picture actually has the sun falling onto some stone at the back and it has a roof, wow.

As for Histories, it is a fine read, you are not the first to find something in there unacceptable. Every historian who disagrees with something in it disses Herodotus, most turn to him when he their supports a view.

I guess you agree with the school history now.

Maybe the neoliths had caravans and moved them all to confuse us

chris




 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 908
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:46   
After reviewing my review of my earlier review, I have come to the conclusion that Stonehenge, and also Avebury, are probably not the remains of a McBeakers fast food outlet, or , indeed, a tour stop off for Billy Silly's Neolithic circus. They are, in fact, Theme parks.
Avebury was the Alton Towers of it's day, and Stonehenge was more like Barry Island ( minus Gavin and Stacey )
It's obvious to me now, Stonehenge is the remains of the fabled , infamous, and very popular, Megalithophobia fun ride. A mixture of the Tea cup's ,hide and seek, musical chairs, and feeding the Christians to the lions. Anyone making it all the way to the inner sanctum had to walk silently over a gravel path, and then lift a black stone, made very hot by some unexplained means, by the inner arms, leaving a nasty burn. A rite of passage for the countries youths, if you survived you could have your pick of the local girls, who, at that time, were really really ugly, and aggressive ( not like now ) Anyone making a habit of winning was cracked on the head and thrown in a bog, unless they were Welsh.
The crowds were kept at bay by the outer water filled ditch, which doesn't seem like much of an obstruction now, but it was populated by man eating Nessies, which worked well.
Contrary to popular belief, Nessies are not Scottish at all, but Welsh in origin, from Llanelli actually. They were trained as aquatic dumper trucks, where they would have large unwanted stones strapped to their backs, and they would swim out to sea and dump them. Unfortunately , they were very attracted to the Wiltshire girls ( of the time ) and they kept absconding to Alton Barnes, stones and all . The locals captured them, made a garden feature of the stones, and kept the Nessies in a large circular ditch thing, at Avebury. They became a popular tourist attraction, so the locals , afraid they would escape, built a wall of stones all the way around inside the ditch, and a tall banking around the outside. This worked well for most of the Nessies, but some of them got out, and found their way to Stonehenge, where they got jobs guarding the newly opened Megalithophobia.
On one day of the year, the rides were free. To mark this day, a stone was set up so that it hid the sunrise on this one day. Everyone would gather at the site, and wait for the dawn. The Nessies would be muzzled, and the normally pristine site would be trashed by drunken Iceni's ( Londoners) A tradition still proudly celebrated today.
Sadly , this Nirvana couldn't last, and when the bubble burst the Nessies were sold to a wealthy Pict, who named his pond after them. Unfortunately, Pictish fish don't agree with Nessies, who tended to lie on the bottom of their pond, digesting the fish. Once a year they floated to the top,flapped their fins, and expelled the trapped wind, then immediately sank again. (This usually happens just before the tourist season.)

And that's how the Moon came to made of cheese.

All of this is true, except the tiny little thing I made up




 Profile   Reply
Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2412
from UK

OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 22:52   
Hi Chris,

I think we have a bit of difficulty here inasmuch as the sites you're referring to were built over quite a vast timespan and all the different types of site you think fit your theory even today have very different uses.

But most importantly, none of them were ever used as living accommodation.

For example, the passage mounds that are aligned to a certain time of the year only have the sun strike their interior for a few days, some only for a few minutes every year.
Have a read of this thread, I think you'll find it interesting.
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=4529&forum=1

Rune




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2652
OFF-Line

 Posted 23-06-2011 at 23:24   
Chris ,Here’s a few of the most obvious problems from comments just made in general discussion never mind the main premise .

Saying someone is "Just being argumentative " doesn't get you off the hook .You said "“Let's look at another solar structure from ancient Britain which does have a roof, is aligned to the winter or summer sun set and had or has a dark altar stone in its heart. There are plenty of these about so I won't dwell on a particular one “
I have already explained that Loughcrew is not aligned on any solstice and does not have a "dark altar stone at it's heart " as there are so many could you find another one this time doing what it says in your comment .
Herodotus can't tell us anything about the prehistoric period in Britain that is reliable .

There is also no evidence for any of the following .
Doors metal covered or otherwise ,paving to the ditch , a roof at Stonehenge or any stone circle for that matter .
Posts outwith the megaliths and close to the ditch of Stonehenge to hold the roof up .
Stonehenge being “clearly a fort or remains of a palace “.
Stonehenge referred to by any Roman historian .
Roman soldiers fighting a battle in stone circle .
Britain trading with Egypt before the first Dynasties .

George





 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 09:06   
Cerrig

that sounds like Stonehenge today, a tourist attraction and ride through history for those too snobby to go to alton towers.

As for McBeakers, I would have thought Taco Bel would have been more appropriate. Thanks for the deadly serious input

chris




 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 09:15   
Yes Rune

like any ancient structures the uses will be varied over vast periods of time. Eventually someone decides to chuck a body in there and we can all relax in the comfort of knowing that all they built for was death.

As for the times of the year when sunlight is actually in the chambers, well clearly you do not have bay windows in your house. If it was such a useless facility, why do architects employ the principle today when energy is so dam cheap. According to some posters here, the trees were all cut down, so what our ancient cousins were warming themselves on the hearth is beyond me.
The stone circles clearly take this to a new level, but we will never get to discuss this facility because you wisely compare the idea to comet dodging bomb proof shelters. cute!

Lets stick to magical energy sources, mystical rites and keep the commercial tours, products and businesses rolling.

chris





 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 09:34   
George

I am glad I did not bother to forage about for the classical texts references for you, since you have dissed just about any ancient text or people that comes close to the time.

The picture on this website clearly shows the sun going into the chamber and hitting a stone at the back that someone at some time has deigned to mark with their religious symbols.
What color are the stones of baal that ancient britons danced around naked?
Take any old quote of celtic gods 'The Celtic fire festival on the first of May, known as Beltane, (the fires of Bel) is probably derived from the name of this deity. Beltane fires were lit to encourage the sun's warmth. These fires also had restorative properties and cattle were herded between them before being loosed on the new spring pastures. From this it is likely that Beli was a fire deity, a patron of flame and the sun's restorative powers (which explains his classical association with Apollo). Originally he may have been a pastoral deity and in Cymric myth is associated with cattle, sheep and cropt. Though this may be because Beltane was the time that herds were moved to the high pastures. '

Bel, baali, bile whatever appellation you want to try, sun god! Can't find an altar stone, well I suggest you aren't looking hard enough.

As for the lack of evidence for these comments, apart from common sense on the roof,

''There is also no evidence for any of the following .
Doors metal covered or otherwise ,paving to the ditch , a roof at Stonehenge or any stone circle for that matter .
Posts outwith the megaliths and close to the ditch of Stonehenge to hold the roof up .''

I agree I have not provided the source for these yet, but as you can not accept any historian regardless of how noble and dull his observations were, like these following quotes.

''Stonehenge being “clearly a fort or remains of a palace “.
Stonehenge referred to by any Roman historian .
Roman soldiers fighting a battle in stone circle .
Britain trading with Egypt before the first Dynasties .''

I guess I am not going to have any success with less reputable sources. Just what sources do you consider valid, where do you get your view exactly?

Ah!, you are a druid priest, with a lineage back to the dawn of Britic civilization, now I get the objections to the boring roman and greek texts.

Chris




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2652
OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 10:20   


Quote:

On 2011-06-24 09:34, SecretsoftheSunSects wrote:
George

I am glad I did not bother to forage about for the classical texts references for you, since you have dissed just about any ancient text or people that comes close to the time.

The picture on this website clearly shows the sun going into the chamber and hitting a stone at the back that someone at some time has deigned to mark with their religious symbols.
What color are the stones of baal that ancient britons danced around naked?
Take any old quote of celtic gods 'The Celtic fire festival on the first of May, known as Beltane, (the fires of Bel) is probably derived from the name of this deity. Beltane fires were lit to encourage the sun's warmth. These fires also had restorative properties and cattle were herded between them before being loosed on the new spring pastures. From this it is likely that Beli was a fire deity, a patron of flame and the sun's restorative powers (which explains his classical association with Apollo). Originally he may have been a pastoral deity and in Cymric myth is associated with cattle, sheep and cropt. Though this may be because Beltane was the time that herds were moved to the high pastures. '

Bel, baali, bile whatever appellation you want to try, sun god! Can't find an altar stone, well I suggest you aren't looking hard enough.

As for the lack of evidence for these comments, apart from common sense on the roof,

''There is also no evidence for any of the following .
Doors metal covered or otherwise ,paving to the ditch , a roof at Stonehenge or any stone circle for that matter .
Posts outwith the megaliths and close to the ditch of Stonehenge to hold the roof up .''

I agree I have not provided the source for these yet, but as you can not accept any historian regardless of how noble and dull his observations were, like these following quotes.

''Stonehenge being “clearly a fort or remains of a palace “.
Stonehenge referred to by any Roman historian .
Roman soldiers fighting a battle in stone circle .
Britain trading with Egypt before the first Dynasties .''

I guess I am not going to have any success with less reputable sources. Just what sources do you consider valid, where do you get your view exactly?

Ah!, you are a druid priest, with a lineage back to the dawn of Britic civilization, now I get the objections to the boring roman and greek texts.

Chris



Chris , all “ancient “texts no matter how old cannot tell us anything reliable about the Neolithic in Britain .If you want to know anything about it archaeology is the most reliable source . Another misrepresentation ,where did I “diss” any ancient people . For the third time , no passage grave at Loughcrew is an example of what you described , cairn T has no solstice alignment and no altar stone , you also said there were plenty , any more ? These misleading comments (polite term ) made here do not encourage optimism for any rigour elsewhere . I do not “have a view “ other than what you are saying here is based on fantasies from the past and contemporary fantasists .
George




 Profile   Reply
TheCaptain



Joined:
30-10-2003


Messages: 1483
from near Bristol

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 12:41   
I think you are on to something here cerrig. It fits into place a lot better than any of the other theories we have been subjected to in the past. But clearly you have more reearch and refinement to do before it will become accepted by either the establishment, hippies, neopagans or the general masses.

I am a bit uncertain as to how these Nessies were originally moved from Wales to Wiltshire. Did they come by boat, overland or by glacial movement? Perhaps they were locked frozen into the icesheet.




 Profile   Reply
Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2412
from UK

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 13:34   
Hi Chris,

This reply concerns passage-mounds, no other structures.

Yes Rune
like any ancient structures the uses will be varied over vast periods of time. Eventually someone decides to chuck a body in there and we can all relax in the comfort of knowing that all they built for was death.


I never said that, nor do I believe it, having visited many passage mounds and crawled into their dark interiors and spent some time there, I've drawn my own conclusions.

As for the times of the year when sunlight is actually in the chambers, well clearly you do not have bay windows in your house. If it was such a useless facility, why do architects employ the principle today when energy is so dam cheap.

The problem is, you've never been in any so you're basing your theory around what you think they are like, rather than what's actually there and has been there since they were constructed.
I'll explain once more, for the last time, based on my own experience of being inside the passage mounds I'm using as examples. Passage mounds have very low entrances. There are none where it's possible to walk upright into them. In Newgrange, you need to stoop and duck a few times. In many others, you need to crouch and shuffle and in even others you have to crawl on your hands and knees. Passages are generally around 10 to 20 feet long and only wide enough for one person. It would not be possible to carry vessels of water in and out of them without considerable difficulty.
Whilst the mounds are quite a size, the chambers inside are comparatively very small. Newgrange and Maeshowe will hold about 20 people maximum but they are the exception, being so huge. Unstan and Tomb of the Eagles are crowded with more than six people inside at once.

All passage mounds are pitch dark inside.

The stone circles clearly take this to a new level, but we will never get to discuss this facility because you wisely compare the idea to comet dodging bomb proof shelters. cute!

You've completely missed the point.

It was an illustration of someone having what they thought was a sound idea based on looking at the construction of passage mounds online and formulating ideas around their observations. However, when the poster visited Newgrange and saw it for himself, saw the tight access, the small space inside, he had to review his ideas.

It's a parallel situation for you. You have the idea for a possible use but as yet you have not visited any passage mounds so you can't see what the rest of us can and what are trying to tell you. All ancient structures are not the same, nor did they serve the same function.

1) The entrances/exits to and from all passage mounds are constructed deliberately to make getting in and out an effort, not an easy stroll. Many are very low.

2) The chambers inside passage mounds are comparatively very small and totally dark.

3) The sun only shines down the passages for a few minutes on a very few days of the year, depending upon which direction and event they are aligned to.

4) Many passage mounds have been excavated and not one has shown signs of habitation.

Our ancestors were far from stupid. If they wanted to build a structure to harness the sun's energy, they would have done so, by ensuring it faced south and had a large entrance for maximum sun exposure.

They would not have made access to it very small and only available for a beam of sunlight to penetrate it for few minutes over a few days each year.

I'm not having a go at you, I'm just pointing out that passage mounds are not and never were intended for your suggested uses.

Rune




 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 16:22   
Rune

This is the first neolithic site I picked from this megalithic portal and I quote

'Despite the very bad weather, and the tail end of a hurricane, the sun made a brief but spectacular appearance inside the chamber of Cairn T at Loughcrew on the 22nd September, on the eve of the Autumn Equinox. Cairn T is aligned so that the rising sun on the equinox illuminates some pretty fascinating carvings on the backstone of the rear chamber.

Shaped by the stones of the passage into a rectangular frame around one solar-like symbol on the top left of this stone, it then moves over the entire stone and finally framing a similar solar symbol on the bottom right of the stone. The beam then passes along the wall of the main chamber before being blocked out completely. The whole process takes over an hour, you can see the result in my Shadows and Stone gallery of this event. '

Are you suggesting this guy faked the shadows of the sun. The stone even has a sun on it so one knows what to do. In September, I guess this cave like dwelling would be a little warmer than your average chamber first thing in the morning. Who knows maybe with a shiny shield or metal plate on the door there might even be a chance of taking the ice off or keeping something dry. I did not have to stumble very far to find a chamber with sun shining down its length onto a stone, with a sun marker on it.

Please do not repeat that these types of structure do not exist, there are plenty of styles and the alignment is just about the only dynamic information the books do hold. Maybe you have selected passage mounds because they are the most unlikely, but even here you have found some large enough for 20 people. I am assuming 3-6 people sleeping and keeping each other warm, not slinging back and watching tv, though I am sure the jones' did have the best snug on the block. Stone circles are another matter altogether.

You assume I have never been in these type of structures, I am kinda reticent since they are usually only attended by a placard and locals see fit to put beer cans, crisp packets and god knows what else in there. Some seem to think they are toilets for some reason. I am sure there are some better cared for examples than those on the border of england and wales or other places you tell me.

I am not saying that there never was a barrow like tomb, just that a large number were not originally tombs. I think if I had the choice between, apparently no accommodation (the view being ported here), a tent like house or a shelter like barrow, cairn etc.. it would be a short competition. At least I would be able to maintain a hibernatory lifestyle for the winter, a bit like bears do, but those bears are real smart. According to some posters here, there was not even any wood to burn so sling on those parkas and freeze. Sure in the summer the circle would win out again.

As for your last set of points

''The stone circles clearly take this to a new level, but we will never get to discuss this facility because you wisely compare the idea to comet dodging bomb proof shelters. cute!

You've completely missed the point.

It was an illustration of someone having what they thought was a sound idea based on looking at the construction of passage mounds online and formulating ideas around their observations. However, when the poster visited Newgrange and saw it for himself, saw the tight access, the small space inside, he had to review his ideas.

It's a parallel situation for you. You have the idea for a possible use but as yet you have not visited any passage mounds so you can't see what the rest of us can and what are trying to tell you. All ancient structures are not the same, nor did they serve the same function.''

As I said above I have been to these sites.

I agree all ancient sites are not the same and did not have the same function, that would be stupid. In any city today, one has crappy little houses often next door to grand mansions. One has commercial properties alongside dwellings, why would it be any different in the ancient world.

Your remaining descriptions that apply to some sites.

''1) The entrances/exits to and from all passage mounds are constructed deliberately to make getting in and out an effort, not an easy stroll. Many are very low.''

No light in means absolutely no solar function, but it does not stop it being a snug place to sleep or stick a corpse for balance. As i have clearly said the properties are a sun drenched chamber, I guess you are being selective for your own ends.

''2) The chambers inside passage mounds are comparatively very small and totally dark.''

What else do you need for a good nights sleep? I only moved to a particular set of mounds because somebody couldn't imagine a roof.

''3) The sun only shines down the passages for a few minutes on a very few days of the year, depending upon which direction and event they are aligned to.''

this is clearly untrue judging by the dude above who visited on the right day and even less true when reflectors are employed.

''4) Many passage mounds have been excavated and not one has shown signs of habitation.''

What exactly are you expecting? Chairs, fridges, beds etc.. Look for the sun bathed altar stones and you will find the sites if you wish to.

''Our ancestors were far from stupid. If they wanted to build a structure to harness the sun's energy, they would have done so, by ensuring it faced south and had a large entrance for maximum sun exposure.''

This would only help in the summer, when they could deal with the relative warmth. Any sun drenched summer versions had alternative functions.

''I'm not having a go at you, I'm just pointing out that passage mounds are not and never were intended for your suggested uses. ''

Maybe you are 'having a go' maybe you aren't, but I have tried to answer he questions as they are posed. No one seems to answer the ones that fall from my research. You do not even posit your own personal view for test.

It is not easy to be coherent on a thread, with the snide remarks, the denial of any actual references, the ignoring of simple questions that run against the conventional view, the refusal to accept that the sun enters many neolithic chambers, the selection of the weakest examples, the idea of roofs in neolithic times, comparative studies etc.. I could go on.

The Ancient solar Premise is simple, the ancients were using the sun originally, not worshiping it. Whenever I come across a culture with a prominent solar deity I do not have to look far for solar aligned structures or devices. Equally I do not have to look far for people with less practical but exciting views who will oppose on every point.

The evolution from basic solar aligned buildings to sophisticated ones can be evidenced in many ancient societies. The neoliths are a prime example obviously with the least supporting evidence, which allows consensus and mob mentality to reign. However if you build the devices you do not have to ask if they were solar, you can feel it.

The themes and principles are outlined in the Secrets of the sun Sects, you are welcome to a free copy and find out for yourself. Alternatively one can run piecemeal in an unsuitable medium for concept appraisal and continue to enjoy whatever benefits you get from your current view. Anything can be made into ''comet bunkers'', which I must say at least provide some benefit to the ancients.

Chris







 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 16:38   
George

Re: solar aligned chamber example see comments I made for Rune. Clearly since you are dissing the ancient writers and Egyptian historians from Herodotus to Livy I guess there is no hope for you. I could run the same reasoning with ancient folklore and ritual, but I guess you stick with diggin in the dirt.

Don't build a structure with a roof, ancient peoples had no need for them.

They found wood all over a landscape cleared of trees to use in their hearths.

The only permanent structures were for burials and religious rites.

Can't possibly have circular houses over 10 or 15m, just impossible.

Couldn't possibly use the sun to warm a tent like building.

Couldn't possibly use those invisible dark stones.

No big ships of the Celts.

No circular buildings, fortresses or palaces outside of Italy, Spain, France, north Africa etc..

Corn all dried in the dirt with the strong autumnal sun for preservation.

No point comparing cultures where all these things are done since they are not neolithic, well except the north american indians.

Neoliths did not even have shiny metals on hand, they were just mining because it kept them warm.

They never influenced another country except the British Isles, well and the Nordics, Iceland, Greenland, Canada, North America, Egypt, The Mdeitteranean, Portugal, Gallic (or is that Gaelic) france ....

Carry on diggin in the ground if you find every point immaterial, where's that ostrich?

BTW Barry Fell got a lot of flack for stating there were neolithic sites in N.America (with dark hub/heel/altar stones), not because of his zoology or views on how they were used.

chris




 Profile   Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2652
OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 16:57   
Chris read what I said about historians , like ethnography and folklore it is interesting but don’t believe it tells you anything reliable about the Neolithic .On a very basic level they were writing 3 millenia after the event .
I don’t understand the list of statements ,maybe you felt the need after my list of misleading statements you had made , none of these statements were made by me , why do persist in making up stuff that you think I believe ?
For the 4 th time and I’ll not repeat it anymore Cairn T ,at Loughcrew is not aligned on the solstice and does not have a central dark Altar stone which was your criteria ,you also said there were plenty of them ,you have failed to find one . Fell ,a zoologist has no credibility within the archaeological community , similarly any of the other authors you have named .
George





 Profile   Reply
cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 908
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 17:22   


Quote:

On 2011-06-24 12:41, TheCaptain wrote:
I think you are on to something here cerrig. It fits into place a lot better than any of the other theories we have been subjected to in the past. But clearly you have more reearch and refinement to do before it will become accepted by either the establishment, hippies, neopagans or the general masses.

I am a bit uncertain as to how these Nessies were originally moved from Wales to Wiltshire. Did they come by boat, overland or by glacial movement? Perhaps they were locked frozen into the icesheet.




Thanks for the interest Captain. It's nice to have someone listen to my theories for a change, and not call me names afterwards. Very refreshing.
As for the Nessies, I pondered long and hard as to how they could have travelled that distance, and how they knew where to go. I found the answer, eventually, hidden deep within the Chronicles, in code . I believe it may be alluded to in an upcoming film " The Ice Queen bite's back"
Apparently, it was all down to the Nessies sense of smell, and the perils of buying unproven technology from a bazaar!
The hero of this story is a young entrepreneur from the area we now know as Surrey. This chap made his fortune by building a "seeing wall " (a kind of prehistoric portal), and then he charged gullible people a small annual fee to travel around the country and then come back and scribble on it. They would paint pictures of the animals they saw, and then paint an outline of their hands to show who'd done it. This, they were assured, would bring them immortality. " Your ancestors will stare at this wall and wonder about the people who did this " was the portals slogan. This was too long to put on business cards, so they scratched it on old deer bones in ogham, and then handed them out for the people to "spread the word,allelujah" This new phenomenon swept the land and made Andebe very very rich. Not bad for an idea he pinched from France.
It all came unstuck when some desciples visited Yorkshire and came back with tales of the things they had seen. These so horrified Andebe that he gave up " the portal" and, along with his glamorous assistant Anjelique, ran away to Europe and toured the land in a circus instead. Andebe was employed to clean up after the performing Mammoths, and every night Anjelique was strapped to a rock and sacrificed to the gods
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=My_eGallery&file=index&do=showpic&pid=66201&orderby=dateD
Unfortunately, when they got to Egypt it all went pear shaped. The local coucils put on very realistic daily sacrifice shows of their own, for free, and the Mammoths were confiscated to build strange huge triangular structures that fried eggs and sharpened razor blades.
Not to be undone, Andebe sold Anjelique for a camel and some goats, and went into plumbing. In the local market he swapped one of the goats for a new device being sold there called a " Solar heater ". All the locals used them to prop their doors open, to let the heat out. But Andebe was assured that all that heat was captured by the "Solar heaters" which could then be used to warm up large mounds of rocks and soil to such an extent that hot baths could be taken. This couldn't actually be demonstrated locally, because it was so hot in Egypt that people took cold water baths instead, to cool down. But, many had been exported to Ireland through the existing trade links, so they should work fine in Briton. He just had to remember the special incantation for each stone ( third party incantations voided the warranty)
Andebe returned triumphantly to Surrey, but the locals remembered who he was, so naturally they chased him away. He wandered far and wide, trying his luck, but no one wanted his wares, until he reached Wiltshire. The girls there ( at that time, not now) were very interested in his wares, but he put them off by saying they had to have hot baths first. They had to cast off the old ways, and embrace the new Sun god. Once all the old ways of washing had been destroyed (oily rags, damp grass etc) the new religion could begin. So the surrounding countryside was purged of anything that could be used for bathing, and mounds of earth and rock with damp dark cramped passages were built. All was ready, the new dawn was about to break, Then a competitor from Worcester hit Andebe on the head with one his "Solar heaters"( from the "Ebony" range ) and he forgot all the incantations. This had a devastating effect on the locale, as no one could wash. It had become punishable by hanging to use anything other than the new ways ( later changed to stoning to make use a newly available resource) This meant that not only were the local girls ( of the time, not now) really really ugly, and aggressive, they also now stank as well.
And that's how the Nessies got to Wiltshire. They swam. They could smell the girls from 130 miles away, and just followed the scent. They thought it was dinner time.
All that nonsense about rafts and glaciers and the like, clearly now completely discredited theories. Although, I'm not quite sure how the scent followed the river Avon, right round the southern coast of England, and back up the Bristol channel , probably some kind of magical essence flowing from Stonehenge that it clung to. Troublesome details are best ignored as irrelevant I find.

Apparently, there's a rumour that genuine replica "Solar heaters" will shortly be available in this websites shop, along with dvd's of "The Ice Queen bites back"in a smart gift set. ( contributory members get 10% discount)


[ This message was edited by: cerrig on 2011-06-25 06:38 ]




 Profile   Reply
SecretsoftheSunSects



Joined:
16-06-2011


Messages: 212
from Cambodia

OFF-Line

 Posted 24-06-2011 at 17:35   
crrigg

sun melts ice, stone blunts teeth, king takes queen,

ho ho ho




 Profile   Reply
Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23
New   Reply
Jump To
 
Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.