Featured Title:
Pictures from the Past: Art and Symbols of the Neolithic and Bronze Age |
 |
| Landscapes for the World: Conserving a Global Heritage |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 111 guests and 3 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> Ancient star map explains Megalithic locations
|
 |
| Page 5 of 7 ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 ) |
| Author |
Ancient star map explains Megalithic locations |
jonm
Joined:
12-07-2011
Messages: 826
from UK
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 29-07-2011 at 19:16
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-29 18:21, Kagaku wrote:
Does anyone out there have any experience in working with a stars Proper Motion?
If we can get more accurate star charts it might help answer some questions.
|
|
Shouldn't you have access to that, if you're promoting the theory?
 Profile
 Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 30-07-2011 at 02:27
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:55 ]
Profile
Reply
|
chimera
Joined:
09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 30-07-2011 at 06:35
Underwater? The Scotland-Kirabati line skims the top ot the molten core of the earth and makes a right-angled triangle with Uluru Australia. The Cygnus constellation angle may be the same as the Great Pyramid, and Uluru's slope, which is the proportional increase in electro-magnetic force with depth within the earth's mantle. The underwater depth of the Cygnus ocean sites is a coded measure of the core's EM and thus tectonic plate movement, to monitor continental drift compared with star movements which overlap with polar reversals.
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 07:33
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:55 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 07:42
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:55 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Runemage
Joined:
15-07-2005
Messages: 2425
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 11:26
So please go away and make your own forum if you want to publish your own theories.
Phrased differently ... 
I think the items you've introduced are detracting from the ongoing discussion and will sidetrack it if they are taken up.
Please could you start a new thread for your new subject.
Rune
Profile
Reply
|
chimera
Joined:
09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 12:13
What? sidetracking this explosive field of research? We're onto a sweeping reconstruction of most of the sciences and historical anthropologies known to man and beast, and I'm behind it absolutely. Underwater, over the poles, beneath the Pyramid and flying high with Cygnus, let's go with Kagagu of Warumungu and Kakadu.
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2707
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 12:30
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-31 07:42, Kagaku wrote:
[quote]
On 2011-07-30 06:35, chimera wrote:
Underwater? The Scotland-Kirabati line skims the top ot the molten core of the earth and makes a right-angled triangle with Uluru Australia. The Cygnus constellation angle may be the same as the Great Pyramid, and Uluru's slope, which is the proportional increase in electro-magnetic force with depth within the earth's mantle. The underwater depth of the Cygnus ocean sites is a coded measure of the core's EM and thus tectonic plate movement, to monitor continental drift compared with star movements which overlap with polar reversals.
|
|
Chimera....
if you are going to introduce your own theory here....
be polite and please identify it as your own theory....
Your comments are clearly intended to confuse people into thinking that your incredible theory is the theory under discussion.
It is thus clear that you have no arguments left and nothing more to add.
So please go away and make your own forum if you want to publish your own theories.
[/quote]
I don't believe there has been any discussion here ,that is actually about your theory . There have been a few dismissive comments ,I have pointed out problems about translations and the conflation of two islands on either side of the UK , nothing on the "theory " as far as I can see . Chimera has come the closest to actually commenting on it , lose him and it will go very quiet . Unless of course you actually say something substantive here .
George
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 13:10
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:56 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2707
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 13:43
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-31 13:10, Kagaku wrote:
No
Chimera was very clear in what he was doing....
A new test for the theory was just developed. And he wanted to distract people from it.
So George, lets get serious about this. Lets get to the point of this forum which is commenting upon the work done?
What is acceptable is short valid comments about obvious mistakes such as whether translations have been done correct. And I really do appreciate it when mistakes are pointed out
But I'm sorry, the purpose here is not to line edit 24 papers. That would be a waste of everyones time and can be better done by contacting the author directly at the journal where the papers are published.
The purpose here is clear and that is to comment on the theory at hand........
George.....as you have introduced yourself as an expert. I assume that you will be trying to defend the current theory.
Shall we start by comparing them side by side?
|
|
I don't think the "point" of this forum is to discuss the "work" done ,at least nobody seems to be doing so .
I get concerned when people ask for mistakes to be pointed out , they usually get abusive when you do ,(or make up statements or beliefs then attribute them to you/one ,see below ) but you at least seem to accept them although have ignored the Iona geoglyph /petroglyph point .
Where did I introduce myself as an expert ? Why assume I will be defending anything ? what current theory ?
George
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 16:50
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:56 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2707
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 17:00
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-31 16:50, Kagaku wrote:
It is totally clear that the point of this forum is to discuss the theory.
|
|
Sorry about the amount of questions but you did make comments to instigate them , and didn't answer them previously .
Can you point out where it is being discussed ?
What about the Iona geoglyph /petroglyph ? .
Where did I introduce myself as an expert ?
Why assume I will be defending anything ?
What current theory ?
George
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5598
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 18:45
Kagaku,
I am pleased to see You standing firm against such questioning.
If I could try to explain what I detect, and which leads to similer...QUESTIONING...
I detect absolute precision, that never ever ever moves at all, and has been the hardest thing to come to terms with personally.
Present upon this FIXED matrix grid is a constantly variable and detectable flow that flows in opposite directions along the matrix at different elevations above surface( wherever the surface is)
I find this very simple to detect, and the system is omni present wherever I try.
I cannot be everywhere at once, but such as this site have enabled everywhere to be accessable at once.
I do assure You that wherever I am , it is simple for Me to triangulate to the nearest meeting point of where the matrix compresses in vortex fashion, I think of this personally as points of power, and can readily at those points plot out the geometries involved using a compass to record the matrix lines relative at that point, and I have done so countless times.
By doing this obsessively I began to SEE the picture, the repetitive occurances, and then found on the internet about fibonacci, and nearly flipped, because it was exactly what I was detecting sequence wise, and numbers wise relative to the numbers of lines meeting at points.
I found electrical involvement on this system, and as a welder recognised certain features and consequences that occur whilst welding using electrical.
I started looking towards the stars, and began to SEE the picture in an ..as above, so below senario, and realised that the picture was of geometry of univese, where the mass of the planet had to be almost ignored.
I will go back to no movement of what I detect, as it is the hardest to accept, as We are totally conditioned to presume that the planet is seperate in a vast void of emptiness, instead I realised it is exactly opposite to this where everything is within a kind of solid, the illusion is of seperateness and apparent movement.
The apparent movement lies within the realmn of the flows that travel on the matrix, and their spiral nature.
I would strongly recommend trying to stick to absolute dead straight alignments , in the face of continual QUESTIONING.
, but try to think of the sphere as almost invisable to the geometry that permeates it, then the picture becomes clearer, but ever so difficult to explain against the totally indoctrinated current accepted thinking.
Our distant ancestors perhaps had no such indoctrination, and reacted to the SIMPLE to detect system all around the globe, no need for any measure at all, no devices, just our natural senses .
Kevin
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2011-07-31 18:49 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2707
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 19:13
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-31 18:45, cropredy wrote:
Kagaku,
I am pleased to see You standing firm against such questioning.
Kevin
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2011-07-31 18:49 ]
|
|
Kevin ,as I appear to be the only one asking questions of Kakagu ,it looks like you might be referring to my questions . The only fiirm stance I can see is a refusal to answer them and only one is related to the "theory" the rest are comments aimed at/about me . Is asking questions in either case somehow inappropriate ?
george
Profile
Reply
|
chimera
Joined:
09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 19:20
You just won't accept the Cygnus of Finland will you, when Kakagu and I are united in the Law of the global map. Uluru is NOT in a vortex and 24 papers are X marked in the Ionan underwater horns of Lascaux. How much profit is there in duality welding flows compared to Russian alignments with no further questions.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5598
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 19:49
George,
With respect, and that is well earned.
The subject been discussed and theorised is mind boggling, and super complex to explain against current accepted theory.
I find the detection extremely simple, and myself do adhere to K.I.S.S.
Which is aimed at Myself, because the complexity is a minefield.
I have been able to follow first the moon, then expanded to the planets, the consequences of their apparent MOVEMENT no matter where they are relative to where I am doing the detecting.
This led Me to Dr TT Brown , and His underground shielded labs around the globe, He too detected a recordable finding that occured at exactly the self same moment around the globe on His recorders, these works are little publicised.
His devices are super secret, but I have puzzled out what is at play, and have been puzzling this for five years.
Most Of what is discussed on here is of a visual nature, a narrow band of a very wide spectrum of signals, and Dr Brown was operating in a very different arena, one which appears to coincide with My arena.
He was very very interested in long past cultures around this globe, and had help with sanscrit in particuler.
It's too big and long a story for here, but it impacts relative to this thread, and the absolute connectivity of all
The fine detail , and account method of showing this will be really difficult to achieve, mostly because of the contradictions it poses to all current understandings, but the megaliths and constructions globally from yesteryear divulge the secrets....if You allow them to without trying to compound the current PROVEN THEORIES.
One of the problems faced when stepping aside from such an entrenched system is that all the tools and charts and softwares written, are to the current accepted norms.
Thus anyone trying to explain a concept of where everything is connected ,is facing a very steep hill to push up against.
I would therefore ask if some slack could be cut , and instead of demanding PROOF, that assistance in trying to comprehend something that is almost incomprehensible is offered.
I have blathered on about dead straight lines, and as far as I can find , at My scale that is exactly what is involved, but fully understand that at vast bigger scale there may be curving involved, but still feel that an adherance to dead straight will help, but that the planet needs to be almost ignored, so that the geometry involved can be seen to be of universe, and that the planets and the sun are exactly where they should be in such geometry, and that their apparent movements are actually the result of opposite directionional spiral flow routes that no matter where You the observer are upon them give the illusion of movement.
That is almost impossible to explain, but just imagine everything switching on'off thousands of times per so called second, and that our senses cannot interact with this.
Basically YOU and everything else doesn't exist as thought of as a solid, and the system of creation and annihilation permeates all of this on a fixed matrix.
I admit it sounds more like science fiction.
kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 19:52
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:56 ]
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5598
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 20:00
I mentioned Dr TT Brown.
I would add that all His life He collected and utilised very specific rocks to utilise in His devices.
This is because of the fine structure makeup of specific rocks from very precise locations that have formed by whatever manner in a fixed matrix , thus they then interact with what is flowing upon that matrix IF correctly positioned, and utilised in devices to interact with the flows.
A rock is not merely a rock.
http://www.rexresearch.com/gravitor/gravitor.htm
He used these devices in heavily shield deep underground bases all around the globe.
There is enormous resistance to the knowledge been released AGAIN.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 20:02
If you want to challenge yourself...create a theory. Test it and identify if it fits or does not fit the model.
Its not so hard to do.....
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2707
OFF-Line
| Posted 31-07-2011 at 20:03
Quote:
|
On 2011-07-31 19:52, Kagaku wrote:
|
|
I don't think the "point" of this forum is to discuss the "work" done ,at least nobody seems to be doing so .
George
[/quote]
.....and if you guys are not going to discuss new theories what is the point of these Forums?
[/quote]
To discuss whatever comes up , you can't force it , if nobody wants to discuss it then tough .
Any chance that might explain these please .?
Can you point out where it is being discussed ?
What about the Iona geoglyph /petroglyph ? .
Where did I introduce myself as an expert ?
Why assume I will be defending anything ?
What current theory ?
All related to comments made by yourself but which you have failed to explain .
George
George
Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|
Main News