| Author |
Ancient star map explains Megalithic locations |
Andy B
Joined:
13-02-2001
Messages: 6992
from Surrey, UK
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 28-04-2011 at 13:53
Derek Cunningham writes: I have just published a series of papers at Midnightsciencejournal.com
http://www.midnightsciencejournal.com
The papers describe an ancient star map that describes the location
of ancient cities and megalithic sites. the theory has survived a
number of tests, and is now being used to predict the location of new
sites.
There are five papers that describe in detail the theory. Four of the
papers test the theory.
Paper 1 describes the discovery of alignment sites in Scotland
Paper 2 shows the alignment sites in Scotland match the Great
Pyramids of Giza and are used to create a stellar map that replicates
the shape of the continents.
Paper 3 locates artwork around the world that describes teh stellar map
Paper 4 shows that the Nazca lines of Peru align to the star pattern
Paper 5 reveals the presence of a third set of alignment lines in
Russia.
I think you will find the series very interesting.
 Profile
 Email
 Reply
|
Andy B
Joined:
13-02-2001
Messages: 6992
from Surrey, UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 28-04-2011 at 13:58
A question for Derek:
With regards to Fig 7 in Paper 3, Three Bird Figures walking across Earth,
(near the bottom of this page)
http://www.midnightsciencejournal.com/2011/03/01/paper-3-the-megalithic-grid/
Why do you think the creators would be using the Mercator projection for maps and how might someone have seen or plotted these figures thousands of miles high (given it's on a Mercator projection)
Andy
Profile
Email
Reply
|
TheCaptain
Joined:
30-10-2003
Messages: 1482
from near Bristol
OFF-Line
| Posted 28-04-2011 at 19:16
Yawn....
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 28-04-2011 at 22:14
Maybe an earthquake will wake You up?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2036
The universe is a near solid with geometric scalar propertis that provide pathways for dragons to travel upon.
The dragons are plasma based , and spiral along Birkeland double sheath currents.
The megaliths this site so wonderfully records were positioned upon the relative matrix of this universal scalar geometry.
cropredy
Profile
Reply
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1599
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| Posted 29-04-2011 at 11:17
Quote:
| On 2011-04-28 19:16, TheCaptain wrote:
Yawn.... |
|
Ditto.
I've just looked at that page Andy referred to.
I see he didn't choose the other figure that's carved on La Puerta Del Sol at Tiwanaku (Fig. 4).
And Fig. 5 ("Stone tablet found at Tianhuanaco site in Bolivia") is the sarcophagus lid from Pakal's tomb at Palenque.
Profile
Reply
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1599
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| Posted 01-05-2011 at 17:30
... which means the chap hasn't even read von Daniken!
Oh dear - is there now a transgenerational meme that inhabits the pseudo-archaeological psyche without reference to previous crackpots?
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 15-05-2011 at 15:13
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:44 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 15-05-2011 at 15:35
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:45 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2634
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-05-2011 at 10:06
Quote:
|
On 2011-05-15 15:13, Kagaku wrote:
If anyone has any other ideas for tests I'm more than willing to try them out. 
|
|
Try Google moon and large scale Lunar maps as a control .
George
Profile
Reply
|
Andy B
Joined:
13-02-2001
Messages: 6992
from Surrey, UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-05-2011 at 12:17
Thanks for coming back to us here to debate this Derek,
Andy
Profile
Email
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 00:29
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:45 ]
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 08:06
Kagaku,
http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba94/feat2.shtml
I am a dowser, and detect a repeatable system that I consider to be a universal matrix.
The basis of this system lies in geometry with the golden ratio and fibonacci sequencing present.
The churchs here are aligned to that matrix , that is the aisle alignment.
As above, so below.
The materials used in past times were to best interact with that which flows about universe, either to resist and locally re-direct this, or to super conducd the flows locally, and the flows have a dual spin basis often called male and female.
cropredy
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 12:24
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:45 ]
Profile
Reply
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1599
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 17:46
So, no link with Pakal and Palenque then, since I see you've now edited out that reference.
By the way, perhaps you'd like to edit this bit too:
"The winged creatures are generated in groups of three".
They are in fact in two groups of eight. I have no idea where you got the figure three from (oh, your whole theory hinges on there being three, doesn't it? - whoops).
[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2011-05-17 17:57 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2634
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 19:22
Sorry Derek of course there are no accurate measurements on the lunar stuff .
I have just had a look at at section 2 and some comments jsut from a few pages . There is no mention of any scale for your relationships between the Giza and Scottish sites . An indication of spatial and angular measurements and where they are measured from , for the pyramids would be good . Then the same for the sites that they are supposed to mirror ,although considering two are islands gives a bit of leeway .
I don't see why your choice of sites , accepting that they are accurate fits , are particularly meaningful Holy Island is a fair size and has nothing like the monument near Loch Stemster . Another site Lurg Mhor , is simply a hill with no historic or prehistoric distinguishing features ,apart from quite a nice ridge connecting it to the much more interesting Bidean a choire Sheasgaich .Lurg Mhor does not mean "Mountain of important paths " it means big shank i.e. the ridge , Lurg being quite a common Gaelic topographical term .
George
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 22:57
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:46 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 23:13
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:46 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-05-2011 at 23:20
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:46 ]
Profile
Reply
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2634
OFF-Line
| Posted 18-05-2011 at 07:47
Derek , I believe you consider this to be a scientific study due to mention of statisitics etc , if so could you please give your spatial and angular measurements for the Giza pyramids and where they are measured from ? Similar results for the Scottish sites that are said to mirror the Egyptian ones and the bearing of the Loch Stemster horseshoe .
These are critical before reading further .
There were some points raised earlier that have not been answered , what is the relationship between The Loch Stemster monument and an island that has no prehistoric monuments and only became "Holy Island " two millenia after the Stemster and Egyptian buildings ?.
Why is Lurg Mhor of any import in this ? why did you think Lurg Mhor meant "Mountain of important paths "?
George
Profile
Reply
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| Posted 18-05-2011 at 12:00
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:47 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Main News