The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
Festival of British Archaeology Events
Stonehenge Summer Solstice 2013
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Ring of Brodgar

Featured Title:
Free book with orders of £10 or over in our shop
Free book with orders of £10 or over in our shop

The Modern Antiquarian Reissued
The Modern Antiquarian Reissued

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 123 guests and 5 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> Stones Forum >> theory
New   Reply
Page 2 of 2 ( 1 | 2 )
Author theory
Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2425
from UK

OFF-Line

 Posted 03-06-2011 at 14:36   
Hi Emmski,

I'm pleased you enjoyed your Newgrange visit. Well done for getting up and going to see how your theory fits in a real place.

Yes, our knowledge of what the ancients did and why they did it, and then why they did it exactly where they did it, is pretty much not much.

Some of their constructions took so long to build and were done in so many stages that it's not certain the people who did the original work envisaged the outcome we see today.

Also, once you think you've found a theory that fits at least one part of the different constructions, you find lots more that don't conform. For me, that's the interest, the never-ending wonderment at what they achieved and how it's stood there for so many thousands of years.

Very interesting to hear those comments about the quartz façade. Little has attracted more criticism of the reconstruction than that, it just looks *so* wrong. When I was there, the guide said they had found those quartz blocks and river pebbles scattered outside the mound and three times O'Kelly built a section of wall that we see today, three times he simulated its collapse over time and all three times, the scatter pattern was identical which is why he decided that's what the outside walls were clad in.
Also, if it was used as flooring in - was it Knowth? - I wonder why it's not mentioned more prominently, it was such an important material to the mound and circle-builders.

I hope your trip has served to pique your interest further, we're always interested to hear about new theories or site-visits and discoveries.

Rune




 Profile   Reply
Go to Page: 1 | 2
New   Reply
Jump To
 
Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.