Featured Title: Watchers of the Dawn DVD and ebook
Sacred Sites Calendar 2013
Login
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.
so the fools who ridiculed me have now dissapeared i did not have sophisticated equipment i just saw the emperors new clothes
i observe things, like this year when i was fishing on a beach i know, i know the rocks, the pools and the tides. 46 years of observation,i saw something which i have never seen before. it could be only be caused by two effects, the moon increasing gravitational effects or sea levels have dropped.As the meadow has not flooded for years, leaves one choice
they talk in the above article in terms such as
"the greatest act of scientific fraud in history"
i do not think so the science peer review is. its structure leads to endorsement of dogma and corruption of data , prozac, tobacco tamiflu, global warming and so on
sea levels are also falling
to think this bullshit that is taught as science fact , global warming, big band with gravity as the creator, wow man evolving from apes, we may as well added some more dogmatic bullshit and teach the events in the bible as science as well.
C2 would be in his heaven punishing and pollution those minds
[/quote]
[ This message was edited by: paulcmuir on 2009-11-29 06:23 ]
Posted 29-11-2009 at 07:29 "to think this bullshit that is taught as science fact , global warming, big band with gravity as the creator, wow man evolving from apes, I take it you're attacking evolutionary theory there? Maybe you should read it first. Man evolving from apes indeed! Sounds like you've been informing yourself from some dirt track Creationists' website.
C2 would be in his heaven punishing and pollution those minds Ummm, why? Because I've done some teaching?
You seem to have a bit of an issue with teachers, I'd love to know the history that caused that!
Incidentally, the accusation that I might pollute young minds is a bit ironic in view of your admission you habitually used to take educationally challenge teenage youths onto the Common in the dark to teach them your non-standard theories.
"i observe things, like this year when i was fishing on a beach i know, i know the rocks, the pools and the tides. 46 years of observation,i saw something which i have never seen before. it could be only be caused by two effects, the moon increasing gravitational effects or sea levels have dropped.As the meadow has not flooded for years, leaves one choice"
So your "observation" just last year leads you to believe sea levels aren't rising, eh?
Pretty impressive. Cropredian. Or Cerrigian.
Trouble is, sea levels ARE rising, all evidence points that way, including the level of the sea, so your interpretation of your own observation must be wrong. Can you bear that to be the case? Of course not, neither can Kev or Cerrig, you all suffer from the same problem.
Oh, and before you launch into a convoluted "glacial melting is nonsense" ramble, keep in mind the rise in sea levels is mainly due not to that but to thermal expansion of water, plain and simple,and there's no, zero, zilch way you or your nutjob website mates can show otherwise.
Tell that to your nocturnal hapless youthful acolytes on the Common, Prof.
[ This message was edited by: Chyknel2 on 2009-11-29 07:41 ]
[quote]
On 2009-11-29 07:29, Chyknel2 wrote:
"to think this bullshit that is taught as science fact , global warming, big band with gravity as the creator, wow man evolving from apes, I take it you're attacking evolutionary theory there? Maybe you should read it first. Man evolving from apes indeed!
>->>>--------------->
Did hemostasis arise through evolution?
Posted 29-11-2009 at 11:25
This link is about pendulem experiments, gravity and TIME are involved and the reasons for megaliths sited where they are is encoded in this ,IF you think away from the brainwashing they have downloaded You with, imo.
When looking at henges, look carefully at what is not there in the ditchs.
Think of WHY huge stones were utilised, think of FLOWS and how the stones absorb those flows, think how the ditch allows less resistance to the flows.
Paul catches the stones acting in this manner.
We have been lied upon lied to with regards to how this universe operates, our megalithic forefathers had a far better comprehension.
The sun is merely a huge stone in space, it absorbs the flows, We are downstream of this.
On 2009-11-29 10:04, Chyknel2 wrote:
Did hemostasis arise through evolution?
Well I'd certainly pose the question on a forum and imply I knew it didn't if I wanted to get attention!!
>->>>-----------------> It's really funny how you f*** off before uncomfortable questions...Something like in old jewish joke: "Isaac,your wife slept with everyone in town."
_ "Phi,what a town is it...two short streets only...."
On 2009-11-29 11:56, Dowser wrote: It's really funny how you f*** off before uncomfortable questions....."
Even funnier you should think anyone here would think your ravings comprise "uncomfortable question" (except you in your silly little closed spiral-dancing forest of course)
Anyhow, not that it will do any good but here's something abouit the evolution of hemostasis together with a long academic reading list on the subject at the end. But of course, you know so much better oh sadselfegopuffer....
http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1998/hemostasis.html
[quote]
On 2009-11-29 11:56, Dowser wrote: It's really funny how you f*** off before uncomfortable questions....."
Even funnier you should think anyone here would think your ravings comprise "uncomfortable question" (except you in your silly little closed spiral-dancing forest of course)
Anyhow, not that it will do any good but here's something abouit the evolution of hemostasis together with a long academic reading list on the subject at the end. But of course, you know so much better oh sadselfegopuffer....
http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1998/hemostasis.html [/quote]>->>>------------>Once again the same problem from old jewish joke!
I did not ask you "how to evolve a system of blood clotting",but
"how system of clotting might arise through the evolution".
The complicated system of clotting had to arise at once, or not work at all..the probability of accidental creation of such a system is of order one divided by the number of all particles of universe.....Creator exist,and he's looking at you.....I have no evidence,sorry!
Posted 29-11-2009 at 16:44 "The complicated system of clotting had to arise at once, or not work at all.."
What a strange assertion. There are lots of far more complex systems that convey a survival advantage that have evolved very slowly. Once again it sounds like a bit of creationist selective myth passed from one website to another.
"the probability of accidental creation of such a system is of order one divided by the number of all particles of universe"
Yep, definitely from Alabamatrailerpark.com
Here's a similar bit of creationist silliness but referring to the human brain, maybe you got it from here -
"The probability (odds, chances) of randomly or accidentally exactly duplicating this 20 billion "bits of information" is 1 in 2^(20 billion) = 1 in 10^(20 billion x 0.301029995664) = 1 in 10^(6,020,599,913) =
1 in "1 followed by 6,020,599,913 zeros".
We can conclude, with as close to absolute certainty as we can imagine, that this 20 billion "bits of information" is not going to be randomly or accidentally duplicated (or come into being that way)."
Ergo there's a creator, yeah yeah.... Can you really not see the fallacy in that?????????????/
"Creator exist" Maybe.
"I have no evidence"[/i]
Exactly. So why say it? Are you a dowser or what?
[ This message was edited by: Chyknel2 on 2009-11-29 16:46 ]
Posted 29-11-2009 at 17:25
Can you really not see the fallacy in that?????????????/>->>>----> True said,no. Can you show me it?
Sure.
Brains don't arise randomly, complete. Nor do they get created (or maybe they do, I dunno). They evolve via billions of random variations of which billions are irrelevant but millions confer a tiny survival advantage over hundreds of millions of years. Trailerparkers calculating the chances of them arising purely by chance ready developed, all at one time are just a tad silly are they not? Hence the fallacy inherent in such calculations.
[ This message was edited by: Chyknel2 on 2009-11-29 17:26 ]
On 2009-11-29 17:25, Chyknel2 wrote:
Sure.
Brains don't arise randomly, complete. Nor do they get created (or maybe they do, I dunno). They evolve via billions of random variations of which billions are irrelevant but millions confer a tiny survival advantage over hundreds of millions of years. Trailerparkers calculating the chances of them arising purely by chance ready developed, all at one time are just a tad silly are they not? Hence the fallacy inherent in such calculations.
[ This message was edited by: Chyknel2 on 2009-11-29 17:26 ]
>->>>--------------------------->This sounds reasonable,I agree with you. But the problem of blood clotting is different. If in the complex of enzymes to miss even one, the system will not work,ergo it had to be created at once,or...we don't exist.
Transitional,or partial forms are not possible.
"SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
........
The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible."
"SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
........
The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible."
Lt Scrounge wrote:
.8 degrees Celsius in over 150 years? Are you kidding me? Especially since around 1850 (159 years ago, go figure) was the approximate end of what is referred to as a "mini ice age". When you defrost your freezer do you call it warming, or thawing? When a frozen over pond melts in spring is it warming or thawing? At this point in time, ANYONE proposing ANY form of CO2 control legislation or regulations should be submitted for psychiatric evaluation, IQ testing, and mandatory sterilization. They're either insane, or a moron and too stupid to be allowed to breed. For that matter tear up their teaching credentials too.
On the topic of Peer Review, their findings were peer reviewed, but only by other pigs saddled up to the same trough. That way none would ask or release any potentially damning data to the public. You know, like the thousands of emails and documents that were hacked and then released anyway.
Patrick Healy wrote:
Hello gullible world, the Church of Climatology is now taking new members.
Pope Al Gore welcomes all you lying, cheating scumbag scientists, believers in climate change, global warming (or what ever you are calling it this week)
L Smith wrote:
All the original video tapes of the 1969 moon landing were also obliterated - apparently re-used for other data...
Joe Schmoe wrote:
Your report says: "The lost material was used to build the databases that have been his life’s work, showing how the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years."
I don't know about you, but if I'd spent my whole life working on something I'd be looking for a slightly better result than a 0.8C change in temperature over 157 years. To me, that level of change falls into the realms of 'statistical error'!
November 30, 2009 7:02 GM
Science woo woo at its best, but the empirically tested peer review system failed again, empirically tested data of woo- funders
so is there a solar minimum on its way, were in it
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use. If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
OFF-Line
Posted 14-10-2009 at 16:37 
Main News