The Megalithic Portal
 - please click to visit this advertiser
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Schaelchenstein Bollersdorf

Featured Title:
Watchers of the Dawn DVD and ebook
Watchers of the Dawn DVD and ebook

The Seven Wonders of the World £4.50+p&p
The Seven Wonders of the World £4.50+p&p

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 120 guests and 7 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , Klingon , sem , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , coldrum , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith

The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >> General Forum >> Roundhouse
New   Reply
Author Roundhouse
Rev



Joined:
13-05-2004


Messages: 19
from Manchester

OFF-Line

 Posted 19-06-2006 at 14:53   
“It would be nice if there was a thread about reconstructional archaeology about building roundhouses for instance”

Wrote ‘mishkin’ on another thread, and I agree with this and duly oblige!

Roundhouses appear to be a regional phenomenon, mainly associated (but not exclusive) with the British Isles. Our continental “Celtic” cousins went in for the rectangular version, it would appear.
Most material I have read seems to indicate a cultural preference for this, but is there another reason behind this difference? Has anybody ever reconstructed a roundhouse and a rectangular house and did they produce comparative findings?
For instance, if we used the same amount of materials in both, (same amount of wood, mud etc), which would produce the bigger, or more efficient, structure?
Are Roundhouses quicker to erect? Is it just an aesthetic difference? Is a roundhouse easier to heat and ventilate?

Rev






 Profile   Reply
coldrum



Joined:
17-09-2002


Messages: 780
OFF-Line

 Posted 21-06-2006 at 19:54   
Not an expert roundhouse builder,but have a few friends who did one as they were part of an Iron Age living history group.
Unfortunatly there little settlement was burnt down by accident,it was situated in a country park in Medway,Kent.
They were going to rebuild it but the local council wouldnt let them unless they used cranes and mechanical lifting equipment which defeated the object of experimental archaeology.
As far as I know the group in nomore.They were trying to set up somewhere else.I hope they eventually do as a reconstructed Iron Age settlement would be good in Kent.
The group was called Cantiaci.
Don't know the ins and outs of construction but apparantly they can keep the heat in the winter and are cool in the summer.
Maybe building the house round was easier.
Some links:

http://www.cinderbury.co.uk/village.htm

http://www.castellhenllys.com/

http://www.butser.org.uk/

http://www.archaeolink.co.uk/

http://www.crannog.co.uk/

http://www.gallica.co.uk/celts/houses.htm

http://www.flagfen.com/iron_age_roundhouse.htm

http://www.bodrifty.co.uk/home.htm

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server.php?show=conProperty.247




 Profile   Reply
bat400



Joined:
10-04-2006


Messages: 1332
from South Central Indiana, US

OFF-Line

 Posted 21-06-2006 at 21:04   
Quote:

On 2006-06-19 14:53, Rev wrote:
Roundhouses appear to be a regional phenomenon, mainly associated (but not exclusive) with the British Isles.


When you say "roundhouse" does this imply a specific method of building or a specific building material? Or does it mean - just "round" - with any other variables possible?

The Mississippian culture of North America build both round and square buildings using exactly the same materials and methods for both. (Wattle and daub on a base framework of small tree trunks sunk upright in a trench.)
Assuming the same materials and same wall height, a round house with a 10 feet diameter uses the same amount of materials as a square house 7.9 feet on a side. Therefore the round house gives you a wider expanse of floor space.

[ This message was edited by: bat400 on 2006-06-21 21:06 ]




 Profile   Reply
mishkin



Joined:
11-09-2005


Messages: 213
from Chelmsford

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-06-2006 at 07:33   
Thanks both to Rev for bringing up this topic and also to Coldrum for the links. Have been to several of the reconstructed roundhouses, remember Butser years ago, and also to the Peat Moor site, which must be similar to the Cinderbury site in doing weaving and blacksmithing... I suppose round as opposed to square was a traditional way of building, in the same way that local material was always used in building houses, stone, wood, lathe and plaster, cob, in later times. Also when building roundhouses with timber uprights how far do they go down into the soil - impossible probably in places like Cornwall,Wales and Scotland on rock..
Also like the original farming plan of the fields at Butser, a sort of permaculture idea, with the fields radiating out from the central living area..




 Profile   Reply
Ambriel



Joined:
21-06-2006


Messages: 5
from Kinlochbervie, Scotland

OFF-Line

 Posted 22-06-2006 at 09:42   
This might seem like a daft question but do you need to get planning permission for this sort of project?

I can imagine all sorts of complications with modern-day building regulations and suchlike.




 Profile   Reply
CinderburyWayne



Joined:
24-02-2006


Messages: 3
from Forest of dean

OFF-Line

 Posted 25-06-2006 at 14:09   
Hello I owCinderbury in the Forest of Dean and you will be required to get planning permission to build a roundhouse unless you have permitted development right which would entitle you to build a structure of upto 70cubic metres with a roof height of about 4metre. These amounts are approx. We were required to get buiding regs as well, originally they wanted concret footings for the roundhouses.

I think there is a benefit in a round house over a rectangular house in that there are no edges which would be more likely to suffer weather damage. ALso a round structure is better at deflecting wind and is usually stronger than a flat surface. The roof cone allows the smoke to collect more effectively as well. Only guesses as I did not actually live in the Iron Age.

Regards

Wayne




 Profile   Reply
New   Reply
Jump To
 
Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.