Featured Title:
Watchers of the Dawn DVD and ebook |
 |
| Ley Lines |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 100 guests and 1 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , Klingon , sem , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , coldrum , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
General Forum >> Were Greeks 1,400 years ahead of their time?
|
 |
| Page 2 of 3 ( 1 | 2 | 3 ) |
| Author |
Were Greeks 1,400 years ahead of their time? |
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 13-06-2006 at 13:24
Exactly Roy. We should bear in mind we're ALL related to Hitler and (worse still) Bush and (maybe) Jesus (though we'd better not go into that) and all wars and hatreds are family affairs.
Anyone who thinks they're not related to history's worst villains has only one defence - that their family line was full of inbreeding... 
 Profile
 Reply
|
corn
Joined:
23-03-2006
Messages: 103
OFF-Line
| Posted 13-06-2006 at 14:02
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-13 12:55, rbatham wrote:
[quote]... by !000AD they numbered more than the pop of Europe so, must have come from Asia, By 1AD thay numbered more than the Earth's population so must have been extra-terrestrials  Roy
|
|
Very good! Arn't some of them a little old by now - especially the extra-terrestrials! 
Profile
Reply
|
corn
Joined:
23-03-2006
Messages: 103
OFF-Line
| Posted 13-06-2006 at 16:32
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-13 13:24, Salopian wrote:
Anyone who thinks they're not related to history's worst villains has only one defence - that their family line was full of inbreeding...
|
|
Quite right. When I traced my family tree back I found most of them to be apes (the rest were T-rex's of course)....strangely enough some of them still are!
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 13-06-2006 at 22:15
Salopian,
Hello, I would appreciate anyone who could show me that what I am proposing is wrong.
Have you any positive alternative suggestions , especially relating to the Greek clockwork device ?
Or are you just trying to be clever , when perhaps your not ?
It is the easiest thing in the world to poke fun and ridicule, the hard bit is standing up and facing that critism, so fire away, give it your best shot.
l am staying tuned into radio 1.618,.618, and the dj is fibonacci, tonights piece is called sacred geometry.
Kevin.
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2006-06-13 22:19 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| Posted 13-06-2006 at 23:06
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-13 22:15, cropredy wrote:
Salopian,
Hello, I would appreciate anyone who could show me that what I am proposing is wrong.
Have you any positive alternative suggestions , especially relating to the Greek clockwork device ?
Or are you just trying to be clever , when perhaps your not ?
It is the easiest thing in the world to poke fun and ridicule, the hard bit is standing up and facing that critism, so fire away, give it your best shot.
|
|
Cropredy, ALL I was reacting to was you saying:
"To understand the above forget the ballocks you have been brainwashed with"
How the blazes do you know what I know? Or whether it is right or wrong? And by what right do you say whatever I know is just brainwashing?
What precisely is the difference between what you said and overbearing arrogant rudeness?
And then you compound it all by saying "are you just trying to be clever , when perhaps your not ?"
What a confounded cheek.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 13-06-2006 at 23:41
Salopian,
It was you that asked " if there was the least chance that I may be wrong"
I would be happy to debate with anyone who comes up with an alternative to my suggestions, have you any ?
If not ,are you just trying to cause trouble ?
You won't debate much if you loose your temper .
You also ask " what the blazes do you know what I know"
I don't know what you know, I am asking if you will tell us ?
I thought that is what a forum is about ?
You are obviously annoyed about what I posted, so if you are saying what I posted is wrong, what do you think is right ?
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 00:07
rbatham, you ask how I relate fibonacci to stone circles.
I can measure the detectable sequence of straight lines that I find crossing at so called circles.
The straight lines are in groups of nine parallel lines.
These lines cross at various angles around 360 degrees, with a central point focused on the central line of the groups of nines, the resultant geometric patterns formed are multi sided polygons, almost hardly detectable as not been circles.
Every measurement pertaining to these setups is totally to the fibonacci sequence, and your reference to sunflower heads, was as good a visualisation as there is.
Because I can detect this, I bother to inform others on such as this site, hopefully so that a better understanding for the reasons that they were constructed can be worked out.
Travelling along these lines is another detectable force, it takes a fair curve course inwards across the polygons that are formed every thirteen inchs around the central point, these polygons radiate out every thirteen inchs for 55 times.
If you have learnt some of the fibonacci sequence ?, you may be beginning to see some of the sequence appearing in what I can detect, and no matter how many people may doubt that I can detect this, I can only say that I do not lie, and that on my childrens and grand childrens lives , this is exactly what I can detect, without a shadow of any doubt.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 00:34
Sorry the link I wanted to post doesn't want to play, it was a site for working out the position of the planets.
Will re-post it when I work out how to.
Kevin
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2006-06-14 00:41 ]
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 00:49
Salopian, hope this works?
this site is on the salopian web, and is excellent for tracking the planets etc, which is what this thread is all about ?
http://www.r-clarke.org.uk/
kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 01:08
Salopian, there is some excellent information contained in your name sake site, one that caught my eye was,
"There are generally now accepted to be 88 constellations "
I would say they have missed one, and there will be 89
This is because I believe everything is to the fibonacci sequence, EVERYTHING.
Including our second little stone moon called Cruithne ?
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 01:24
For those interested in the celts, or the dawning of the age of Aquarious, this is a good link,
Cruithne,
http://www.achernar.btinternet.co.uk/cruithne.html
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 07:01
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-13 23:41, cropredy wrote:
Salopian,
It was you that asked " if there was the least chance that I may be wrong" |
|
I certainly did.
Rather mild, in view of your assertion everyone else is brainwashed.
So how about an answer. IS there? Is there the least possibility it is YOU that moves your rods, subconsciously? If not, I'd be fascinated to know how you know.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 10:06
Salopian,
Glad your still talking, I didn't say everyone else is brainwashed, but I do believe a vast amount of what is taught is bordering on parrot like brainwashing.
My rods moving,
The really easy way to address this problem would be for you to try with some rods?
There is a way of trying to explain what I believe moves them, and I agree it must be related in a way to the person holding them.
The material the rods are made of has an important bearing on this as well, and I am certain that pure gold will be found to be the most sensitive , this is because I consider that the dowsers field around themselves aligns and tunes into the field around this planet, and that the rods become a sort of arial that aligns to the subtle signals that are all around us, and are supplying the power as such to ourselves .
It takes considerable practise to truly master the rods, and have control of them, and to be able to switch around the available signals, sort of tuning a dial, but actually tuning the gland in your forehead.
I have recently made some new rods from carbon fibre, these are the most reseptive rods I have ever held, I am going to make some quite large versions of these ( telescopic, aprox six feet long ,each one ) these I will paint in a lurid flourescent colour, to demonstrate dowsing.
The carbon and the spiral weave of carbon fibre is a clue to why these work so well, and they are ever so light.
All the luner bodies that the greeks will have been simulating the movement of with the device that this thread is about, transmit a series of parallel lines , these repeat at reguler intervals aprox 400 feet apart.
There are I consider 89 of these alignments, because EVERYTHING, is I consider to the fibonacci sequence.
Glastonbury tor is the spot where I have found the most crossing lines , 55 times at this spot.
When I find a spot where 89 lines cross, I will let all know, I have an idea exactly where these spots are around this planet, and I feel a race of people long ago knew far better than me where these spots were.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 10:35
I didn't say everyone else is brainwashed...
I think you did.
The really easy way to address this problem would be for you to try with some rods?....
No. Since I, like you, I would have no means of knowing if it was real or the workings of subconscious wish-fulfilment
All I'm asking is that you ditch the absolute nature of your belief since it leads to remarks like the "vast amount of what is taught is bordering on parrot like brainwashing" which you have no way of knowing is true and comes out as very offensive.
Either show proof or humility and then we'll get on just fine.
Profile
Reply
|
corn
Joined:
23-03-2006
Messages: 103
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 13:17
[quote]
On 2006-06-13 22:cropredy wrote...
l am staying tuned into radio 1.618,.618, and the dj is fibonacci, tonights piece is called sacred geometry.
Kevin.
Once again, the fibonacci numbers are rubbish. You can make any sequence of numbers, or a individual number, fit in with something! 
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 14:53
Corn, you say the fibonacci numbers are rubbish.
The numbers are one thing, it is the sequence that matters.
You can fit other sets of numbers , but just follow the sequence.
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89.............................
It will be the best thing you ever learn in your life, if you can grasp this sequence, on the face of it I can appreciate your ridicule, but fibonacci is king, full stop.
follow it into the golden numbers of 1.618,.618.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 15:16
Salopian, PROOF, I keep seeing this word?
I will provide your proof, I have said this enough times, it is not easy, but I will.
Has for the movement of the rods been some wishfull thinking, sorry, afraid not, they move to the lines and the force travelling along the lines, it all operates at a far higher level of intelligence ever available in my little head.
In the beginning there was light, if you want to start there and work along the lines what happened next ,
It's really simple,
0 added to 1, and became one, one added to one and became two, two added to one and became three, three added to two and became five.
eventually there was now.
Not bad from a bit of light, can't puzzle who switched the light on, never mind, does it matter ?
Most people need to know, I don't.
From the light and back to the light, thats all there is, and the light travels along nine lines, in three groups of threes.
I will prove this by clues left from people who are now just dust and light particles, these light particles are you and everything.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
corn
Joined:
23-03-2006
Messages: 103
OFF-Line
| Posted 14-06-2006 at 16:44
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-14 14:53, cropredy wrote:
.....just follow the sequence.
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89.............................
It will be the best thing you ever learn in your life,
|
|
But as I have already put this sequence was wrongly compiled in the first place! It doesn't mean anything...it's like any other number thing that these potty mathematician's come up with. And there's hundreds of them all laying claim to 'magic' numbers! One of the latest ones(by Heath) is that the number 33 is the most significant number to life,the universe and all that! Everyone knows the answer is 42!!!!
Profile
Reply
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| Posted 15-06-2006 at 10:50
Cropredy -
"I will provide your proof, I have said this enough times"
You have indeed. May we yet know when and how?
"the movement of the rods been some wishfull thinking, sorry, afraid not"
Had you said, "yes, there's a finite possibility" it would have been better. As it is, you're claiming something you can't possibly know is true. You have a belief. Why should anyone believe your belief? Your call is for "faith". No thanks.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5525
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 15-06-2006 at 14:06
Salopian, not a belief.
Absolutely , unquestionably fact, I WILL PROVE this beyond any doubt, any question.
Belief is the problem, it seems to be a very powerfull blocking system ?
I am not looking for converts to any belief system.
I am very fortunate in that I have no belief system, it has always seemed odd to me ?
If I was religious , I would be in a monastry right now, I have seen the light, quite litterally.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|
Main News