Featured Title:
Stone Circle Greetings Cards |
 |
| Ley Lines |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 140 guests and 6 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
Stones Forum >> The Science behind Orbs Energy and Mists, the ‘theory of everything’
|
 |
| Author |
The Science behind Orbs Energy and Mists, the ‘theory of everything’ |
Andy B
Joined:
13-02-2001
Messages: 7001
from Surrey, UK
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 21-03-2006 at 13:45
An anonymous poster writes:
One Off Talk 30th March 2006
I hope you will forgive me for posting this - it is not myself however I have watched this gentleman, Paul Muir, lecture previously (throughout the world) and his findings are intelligent and visionary.
He is a serious scientist who has entirely dedicated the past few years of his life to bringing his work to the public eye - he makes no money from this and the door charge simply covers the cost of putting on the Talk (venue hire etc).
Paul is the most genuine individual I have ever met and has time for every single person who comes to him for information. He has encounter experiences surrounding Megalithic structures that defy conventional logic until you actually listen to his explaination which is enitrely grounded and of sound scientific basis.
I would urge any interested readers to pop along, not to support him but to support their own desire to learn new information about the relevance of UK Standing Stone sites.
The following is lifted from one of his Flyers.
The Science behind Orbs Energy and Mists
The ‘theory of everything’
Glastonbury Town Hall
Thursday 30th March 2006
A fascinating and unique Talk on the findings of investigations carried out since 1996 by a team of British researchers into the source of naturally occurring phenomena including energy orbs, electromagnetic fields, Ley Lines and their effects on our day to day lives.
Who should attend?
The Presentation has been carefully structured to be absorbing for members of the general public as well as genuine technical value to the scientist.
► Innovative understanding of the scientific explanations behind natural energy processes affecting quantum and astro physics, biochemistry and health epidemiology.
► Members of the general public interested in the origins of mankind, with a particular slant to the builders of Britain’s oldest ancient monuments, electromagnetic emission, Ley Lines and the expansive Neolithic use of natural energy.
► All interested in the impact of the imminent return of this knowledge
(Please Note: all research findings and data is copyrighted pending publication and we would therefore advise that reproduction of presented material is strictly prohibited)).
The talk includes unseen photographs and video footage which unlock some of the most ancient understandings of humanity and its links to creation.
Doors open at 7.00 pm for 7.15 pm
Admission £3.50
 Profile
 Email
 Reply
|
MickM
Joined:
02-01-2005
Messages: 192
from London
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2006 at 20:49
Quote:
|
► Members of the general public interested in the origins of mankind, with a particular slant to the builders of Britain’s oldest ancient monuments.....
|
|
Does this mean that mankind (if not the world) was created on October 23rd, 4004bc at 9:00 o'clock in the morning after all!
Profile
Reply
|
Anonymous
User not Registered | Posted 23-03-2006 at 06:58
Might it be a good idea to re-jig the forum descriptions here so that topics which pre-suppose a belief in energies and leys and such like were separate from plain old discussions of megalithic places on a conventional scientific basis?
I happen to be interested only in the latter and suspect I'm not alone. The discussions here are less comprehensive than might be expected in view of the size of the site, and I can only think that many people, like me, are a bit put off by some of the content. I'd prefer to visit a single dedicated forum where I was confident that every thread was based upon a "conventional" view of the world.
Perhaps I could be accused of being closed minded, but frankly I'm happy to be so and wouldn't be surprised if I'm in a large majority. If so, then maybe it would be worth giving the customers what they want, at least on a trial basis. My bet is that the experiment would be a roaring success.
Reply
|
Thorgrim
Joined:
25-06-2003
Messages: 794
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 07:25
Yes and that is the general idea. The Portal does have a forum for Sacred Sites where "alternative" ideas can be expressed. The energy orbs stuff should have gone there surely.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
 ON-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 18:30
Thorgrin, I agree with you , but if you try pressing the sacred sights one , it pops you to here ?
I am living proof of the problems expressed by annonamouse( be better to call people who hide their names acowardice ? )
The whole subject just causes too much of a rash with many, in fact, they get so hot under the coller that they begin to "see" lizards, so it is understandable how these people react .
The sad thing is that, I am 100% convinced that the ancient sites are totally to do with a non visable force,so it leaves the likes of me, in a strange position, as at no time do I lie, or not say what I believe.
The best solution, until a provable theory can be produced, would for the benifit of sanity, to keep the tribes coralled up in their own little stone circles.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 18:35
Thorgrim, sorry got your name wrong, actually quite like thorgrin, makes me think of a big smile
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Anonymous
User not Registered | Posted 23-03-2006 at 19:24
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-23 18:30, cropredy wrote:
The best solution, until a provable theory can be produced, would for the benifit of sanity, to keep the tribes coralled up in their own little stone circles.
Kevin
|
|
Agreed.
Hooray.
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 20:34
Anon i mouse, glad to please honarable one,
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Andy B
Joined:
13-02-2001
Messages: 7001
from Surrey, UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 21:11
Alternative theories have nothing to do with the 'sacredness' of sites. What about the healing powers of megaliths thread, that was pretty alternative, where would you draw the line?
We may not agree with alternative views but they are welcome to be debated in this forum. It is not compulsory to read every item!
Profile
Email
Reply
|
Thorgrim
Joined:
25-06-2003
Messages: 794
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 21:57
Perhaps you should look again at your own guidelines:
Sacred Sites?
If you dowse, hug the stones, do ritual, trace pictures, have a theory or two that you want to try on the rest of us, this is the place. A good place to post your personal experiences and questions to other members..
Profile
Reply
|
sem
Joined:
12-11-2003
Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2006 at 23:07
It's funny that the topic of sacredness is being discussed as me and my mate Nick were contacted by Ug (a denizen of the old world) last night. We were talking about what we should do over Easter (I suggested cocaine but Nick thought E's more appropriate as there are capital letters involved). At first we thought the thump, thump was someone at the door selling dishcloths or, GOD FORBID, religion. But after sober consideration on my part (Nick thought the bong might have been knocked over) we realised that Ug was trying to make contact. The following is a transcript, or at least our transcript, of the conversation.
UG: Yo dudes, got some good news. There's a man on a cross getting his words across. Circles are out gotta sing and shout 'bout Easter, expand your vista.
US: Sorry Ug?
UG: Gotta gun gonna blow Stonehenge, Avebury's history, comprehend ?
US: Slow down Ug. We're the ones who are stoned.
UG: Changed where I lived, changed the region, changed my God for a new religion. Megalithic, kiss my arse, don't need no stones to show me the path.
US: Sorry Ug you've lost us.
UG: That's because you modern people aren't willing to change and you're boring. In the words of Uncle T Uggy DJ
"May the circle be unbroken, by and by Lord, by and by,
There's a mother with a magnum, gonna make you see the light."
Circles are out dudes. See you later motherf*****s
US: (With a big sigh of relief) See you soon Dude.
Profile
Reply
|
Anonymous
User not Registered | Posted 24-03-2006 at 00:13
[quote]
On 2006-03-23 21:11, Andy B wrote:
where would you draw the line?
Well I know where I draw it. But then that's personal to me. It's your site, so no doubt you'll draw it where you see fit. However, I would ask you to consider whether most people would be like me and pretty fed up with irrational stuff.
Those who are into it tend to take exception to the idea of being ghettoized into their own separate forum. Maybe that's because if they were, no-one would read them! Is that not a clue to majority taste?
You say it's not compulsory to read every item. But actually, bear in mind that in addition to "alternative" threads some others get hijacked so the balance here, IMO, isn't to the taste of the majority and this must be damaging to forum numbers and participation.
Reply
|
Thorgrim
Joined:
25-06-2003
Messages: 794
OFF-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 08:20
That would be my preference. We have three forums: Stones should be for mainstream prehistoric discussion, Sacred Sites should be for paganism in its broadest sense and General for anything else. Alternative theories such as "energy orbs" which have nothing to do with prehistoric sites could go on General or Sacred Sites forums so no one is excluding them.
The Portal's forums are woefully underused, but that is partly compensated for by the ability to add comments directly to photos and articles. A rethink might be beneficial.
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 09:22
Confusious says ,
On a road runnung North/ south, if two people stand back to back, one looking North, the other looking South, though they have opposing views, they are both looling at the same road, and the same line .
If these two people cannot be sure which is the correct route, who would choose which way?
If many had for years looked South, and told each other they were right, would they be right or wrong, if the minority said perhaps we should go this way ?
Would it be right for the majority to push onward down the right/wrong road?
Should the minority follow the majority?, even if perhaps they are going the wrong way, or should the minority go their own way, better says confusious if they work out between them, which is right way, then all can go right way, otherwise some will go wrong way.
Kevin, who admires those honarable thinkers.
Profile
Reply
|
Anonymous
User not Registered | Posted 24-03-2006 at 09:37
Quote:
|
The Portal's forums are woefully underused..........A rethink might be beneficial.
|
|
I agree the portal's forums are startlingly underused.
Given the huge visitor numbers there's no good reason why, with a bit of tweaking, they shouldn't be fantastically vibrant and comprehensive, as big or bigger than anything else. I hope it happens. All megalithic forums and the whole megalithic community would benefit greatly.
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 09:40
Quote:
|
Thorgrim writes,"Alternative theories such as energy orbs which have nothing to do with prehistoric sites "
I would respectfully suggest should add " in my opinion have nothing to do with prehistoric sites" ?
I have been beaten to a pulp over on another forum , for stating things that are my personel beliefs, so whats right for one , must be right for all ?
Kevin
On 2006-03-24 08:20, Thorgrim wrote:
That would be my preference. We have three forums: Stones should be for mainstream prehistoric discussion, Sacred Sites should be for paganism in its broadest sense and General for anything else. Alternative theories such as "energy orbs" which have nothing to do with prehistoric sites could go on General or Sacred Sites forums so no one is excluding them.
The Portal's forums are woefully underused, but that is partly compensated for by the ability to add comments directly to photos and articles. A rethink might be beneficial.
|
|
Profile
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 10:00
If anon i mouse , hides away, I will think of him as Adolf anon i mouse,
Adolf the fundementalist, demands all follow his opinion, if not, he will stomp out of the playground, with his bat and ball, and not play anymore.
I do agree, it is a mystery why this forum is so quiet ?
And as someone who has been on the recieving end of sometimes fair, sometimes unfair critism, simply for airing an alternative view point, I can see the sense in some neutral territory, where opposing forces could be kept seperate, whilst leaving their encampments corralled up, and not fighting each other all the time, then whatever % of troop numbers could feel safer, and be able to air their views, without been bopped on the head continuously.
Then when the final battles are been fought, in say 6.5 years time, we all will see which army had the correct battle plans.
Julious commonsensious kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Anonymous
User not Registered | Posted 24-03-2006 at 10:34
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-24 10:00, cropredy wrote:
Then when the final battles are been fought, in say 6.5 years time, we all will see which army had the correct battle plans.
|
|
That illustrates the problem as I see it beautifully.
6.5 years brings us to December 2012 when, according to you on Stone Pages, the world is for it. One of Mike's ideas, that you've picked up and run with.
I don't want to go on with this so I'll say it once and then shut up:
Most people and most potential future users of this forum think such talk is baloney and don't want to be in an environment where it and similar stuff is being constantly pushed. That being so, Meg Portal's main forum has a choice - stay as it is, with a baloneyesque flavour and consequent limited usage, or expand hugely to the size this amazing site warrants. It can only do the latter by providing a discussion environment that most people find attractive and grown-up and stimulating. It's not doing that at the moment and a basic choice needs to be made IMO.
Reply
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
ON-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 11:52
Adolph , has presumed to know my mind.
He declares that I have picked up some thinking of Mikes and chosen to run with it.
I have my own mind, my own working outs , and have studied the alignments , that many ancient civilizations have also worked out.
I am alarmed at the possibilities, the gravitational forces will be massive, nothing stays the same, do not be so arrogant Adolph to think they do, or have in the not too distant a past.
Very few people will have been left after the last alignment, we are the descendants, down from the mountain tops, left with nothing, and only stories to tell of the events that happened.
But clues are left over, and many are contained in sites such as this, and if we work out those clues, and not just view them as some private relics, that only a select few can discuss, as the EXPERTS, and any radical thinking alternate just scoffed at and dismissed in a super arrogant way, then we may be able to better understand not only the sites and the clues contained in them, but what may happen in the coming years, hopefully nothing, but ME, KEVIN, is not too hopefull, and as I have had a good innings, well , what will be will be, but my children, and grandchildren havent had a good innings, so nothing you say Adolph will cease my quest to work out the ancient sites, and why two stupid rods move in my hands.
I have the greatest respect for Mike, and look forward to actually meeting him, cant say I fully understand him, but thet may be my failing, and I am always looking to learn.
Kevin
Profile
Reply
|
Thorgrim
Joined:
25-06-2003
Messages: 794
OFF-Line
| Posted 24-03-2006 at 12:37
Well - we are not so quiet now. The Stones forum has picked up on this item but what is all that stuff about looking north or south on a road. Ah well...
At least Cropredy leaves a name - anonymous comments are frustrating 'cos you never know who is saying what.
Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|
Main News