The Cove, Avebury, England. - An attempt to straighten the two stones called 'The Cove' in 2003, revealed the fact that one of the stones, which stands 14ft (4.4m), above the ground, also exists at least 7ft (2.2m) below the ground (reaching a possible 10ft /3m deep).

The weight of this stone is calculated at around 100 tons.

Refs: Daily Telegraph News (8 April 2003); The Scotsman (17 April 2003), The Guardian (18 April 2003)

On 2011-12-21 09:15, cropredy wrote:
Ledgehammer,
Theres possibly another stone missing at the cove from where the two detectable flows first meet each other.

Then I cannot emphasize the horizontal layerings enough, and Avebury IMHO is ALL about the concentration and direction of these two seperate flows with the division of the two in the horizontal layers vital.

If You think of each stone as an accumulator, with switching abilities relative to their crystaline inbuilt matrix, and put this together with modern solid state technology, then as the inputs incoming and emmiting from above and below at the nodal points where the stones are positioned upon varies relative to how our solar system is churning, then local ability to manipulate these flows in a designd and desired method becomes available.

IF You know the flows and can recognise them and interact with them.
Then by doing so You can achieve a local control and concentration of the two opposite spin serpents to achieve Your objectives and desired usages of these flows.

Size does matter , in so much as the larger mass can store and act in a sponge like manner in local storage, and as the flows naturally circulate at very specific diameters with individual shaping relative to where the inflow and outflow central nodal points are, then by placing large mass stones around such circulations precisely where multiple inflow and outflow minor lines are crossing the circulations You then build up in series even more local accumulations of each opposite spin flows.
cropredy

why use a stone so big?

On 2011-12-21 09:31, karloff wrote:

Quote:

On 2011-12-21 09:15, cropredy wrote: Ledgehammer, Theres possibly another stone missing at the cove from where the two detectable flows first meet each other. Then I cannot emphasize the horizontal layerings enough, and Avebury IMHO is ALL about the concentration and direction of these two seperate flows with the division of the two in the horizontal layers vital. If You think of each stone as an accumulator, with switching abilities relative to their crystaline inbuilt matrix, and put this together with modern solid state technology, then as the inputs incoming and emmiting from above and below at the nodal points where the stones are positioned upon varies relative to how our solar system is churning, then local ability to manipulate these flows in a designd and desired method becomes available. IF You know the flows and can recognise them and interact with them. Then by doing so You can achieve a local control and concentration of the two opposite spin serpents to achieve Your objectives and desired usages of these flows. Size does matter , in so much as the larger mass can store and act in a sponge like manner in local storage, and as the flows naturally circulate at very specific diameters with individual shaping relative to where the inflow and outflow central nodal points are, then by placing large mass stones around such circulations precisely where multiple inflow and outflow minor lines are crossing the circulations You then build up in series even more local accumulations of each opposite spin flows. cropredy

Hi
Ok so you can manipulate these flows but to attain what? What is the outcome of all this?

It's all well and good to talk about "specific diameters", "spin flows" and "crystaline inbuilt matrix" but what does all this "manipulation" of flows lead to?

On 2011-12-21 13:23, jonm wrote:

Quote:

why use a stone so big?

Which stone is it Tom? The one to the East or North or the other half-way one?

Recently the Cove stones have undergone work to stabilise them. During this process excavation has revealed that the stones are set far deeper in the ground than had been previously thought which makes them substantially larger than earlier estimates allowed. It is now thought that the "female" component may possibly approach 100 tons in weight and can be considered as the most massive surviving stone of the monument. It has been suggested that this stone may have already been in situ due to its size and the large portion of it buried in the ground. If this was the case the implications for interpreting how the henge was built and located are considerable

On 2011-12-21 00:19, sem wrote:
Tom, top 50 megaliths?
Is size that important?
Does it depend on where you measure it from?
Science does lots of things, but the pleasure gained from from a small monolith versus that from a huge megalith has never been measured.

On 2011-12-21 09:15, cropredy wrote:
Ledgehammer,
Theres possibly another stone missing at the cove from where the two detectable flows first meet each other.

Then I cannot emphasize the horizontal layerings enough, and Avebury IMHO is ALL about the concentration and direction of these two seperate flows with the division of the two in the horizontal layers vital.

If You think of each stone as an accumulator, with switching abilities relative to their crystaline inbuilt matrix, and put this together with modern solid state technology, then as the inputs incoming and emmiting from above and below at the nodal points where the stones are positioned upon varies relative to how our solar system is churning, then local ability to manipulate these flows in a designd and desired method becomes available.

IF You know the flows and can recognise them and interact with them.
Then by doing so You can achieve a local control and concentration of the two opposite spin serpents to achieve Your objectives and desired usages of these flows.

Size does matter , in so much as the larger mass can store and act in a sponge like manner in local storage, and as the flows naturally circulate at very specific diameters with individual shaping relative to where the inflow and outflow central nodal points are, then by placing large mass stones around such circulations precisely where multiple inflow and outflow minor lines are crossing the circulations You then build up in series even more local accumulations of each opposite spin flows.
cropredy

On 2011-12-20 23:07, Runemage wrote:
Hi Tom,

Several stones are known to be set very deeply, Rudston Monolith is another one. Perhaps there's a clue in the underlying geology as well as geomancy?

Rune

On 2011-12-21 20:39, cropredy wrote:
Ledgehammer,
Think of the stones like sponges, have You researched Kozyrev and torsion fields?
I KNOW that You are researching torsion fields.
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/05/kozyrev_aether_time_and_torsio.html#more
cropredy

On 2011-12-22 16:36, jonm wrote:
Many thanks Tom,

that's dead useful. Looked at it again; it's the smaller one (the male one) that is dead centre of the circle by the look of it?

Looked at it on google (should have gone there when visiting my uncle) and, viewed from the West (see image), the top surface of the 'male' stone appears to point North and up to the pole star:

Is that just an optical illusion or does it really do that?




[ This message was edited by: jonm on 2011-12-22 16:37 ]

On 2011-12-22 16:36, jonm wrote:
Many thanks Tom,

that's dead useful. Looked at it again; it's the smaller one (the male one) that is dead centre of the circle by the look of it?

Looked at it on google (should have gone there when visiting my uncle) and, viewed from the West (see image), the top surface of the 'male' stone appears to point North and up to the pole star:

Is that just an optical illusion or does it really do that?




[ This message was edited by: jonm on 2011-12-22 16:37 ]

On 2011-12-22 16:12, Runemage wrote:
Some of the discussion on here has been about flows of energy, I've no idea if this is relevant or not but it's causing a ripple of excitement among some of my more geeky friends. Basically, this is happening and according to current (!) understanding, it shouldn't.

http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/12/dropping-a-magnet-through-a-copper-pipe.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+makezineonline+%28MAKE%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Rune